Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شريان الامير♥

Channel

شريان الامير♥

@SHRYEEN

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,130subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196219446
TypeChannel
Username@SHRYEEN
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SHRYEEN

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@raflq65/402809 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC@SHRYEEN/20460 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@raflq65/4029512 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC@SHRYEEN/20461 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@raflq65/4034220 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC@SHRYEEN/20464 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC1.00under a minute
@raflq65/4035924 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC@SHRYEEN/20465 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@raflq65/4037127 Jul 2026, 22:41 UTC@SHRYEEN/20467 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@raflq655 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@raflq65 (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @raflq65. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,1302,1702,1507 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,167 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,157 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,153 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,149 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,137 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,139 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,130 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,124–2,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 02:072,130-9
29 Aug 2026, 18:352,139+2
26 Aug 2026, 16:482,137-12
23 Aug 2026, 08:122,149-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:362,153-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:582,157-8
13 Aug 2026, 07:542,165-2
10 Aug 2026, 08:132,167-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:152,170no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:022,170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

233 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10344.2%
👍7230.9%
🤣229.44%
👏125.15%
😁125.15%
🌚31.29%
🕊31.29%
😢31.29%
💯20.858%
10.429%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SHRYEEN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC303 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من اشتهى الغلطة فلا تستكثرها عليه، ومن تمسك بقشة فدعه يسقط بها، لا تصلح من لا يريد الصلاح، ولا تلاحق من اختار الإهمال، فالمطنش يُطنش، والمهمل يُترك، ومن آثر السقوط فلا تمنع وقوعه، لا تبرير لمدور الزلة، ولا عتاب للعارف المتعمد، أرح قلبك مبكرًا فبعض الكثرة تشبه العدم.

👍42👏2

24 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC533 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يا صاحبي وقت الضيق لا تقول ليش أنا؟ وتفتح للشيطان باب، ولليأس باب، اللي كتب لك هالابتلاء أرحم بك من نفسك، ولو شفت الغيب ما اخترت غير تدبيره، كم ضيقةٍ وراها فرج، وكم منعٍ باطنه حماية، بدل ما تسأل ليش، قل يارب كيف أرضيك، وابشر بجبرٍ من كريم ما ينسى جهادك وصبرك.

5👍3

20 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC600 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من ترك الأصيل باختياره، أذلته الحياة بالرديء رغماً عنه، فما أشد تأديب الأيام حين تعلم المرء قيمة النعمة بعد أن فرط فيها، وحين تريه ثمن الاستخفاف بما لا يُعوض.

👍91

15 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC773 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مو مهم تتكلم عربي ولا انجليزي ولا فرنساوي المهم تتكلم بالأصول .

👍141

13 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC820 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لما كان عمري 6 سنه كنت اروح للحلاق كان يقولي دقن ولا راس يمزح معي طبعاً والمشكله عديت 21 سنه وعاده يمزح معي للان.

😁111👍1

12 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC834 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

يقال قديماً إذا اشتهى القلب ساق القدم، فلا تعاتب أحدًا، المسافة تُقاس بالرغبة لا بالأميال، ومن أرادك حقاً طوى الأرض وتجاوز الأعذار ليصل إليك، فمتى ما صدقت المودة هانت المشقة.

👍11💯1

9 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC885 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‏نقاء باطنك ينعكس على رؤيتك لمن حولك، ومن شُوهت سريرته رأى الناس بعين نقصه، خديعتك في بعض البشر ليست سذاجة، بل هي شهادة لطيب أصلك وصفاء نيتك، ولكي تطمئن وتسلم، اجعل دعاءك دائماً: اللهم أرنا الناس على حقيقتهم ولا تبتلينا.

👍53🕊1

8 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC897 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بعض النسسواان م تعرفش تسوق سيارات، بس سايقين ذكـ ـوور بشنبات 🤝🏻

🤣12

29 Jun 2026, 20:19 UTC≈3,010 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مانفع أن تتسع ابتسامتك للغرباء وتضيق بها جدران بيتك، وما قيمة مديح الناس لك، بينما ألسنة أقرب الناس إليك تشتكي منك، أسهل ما يُتقن المرء ارتداء قناع اللطف أمام الناس، فالغرباء لا يرون منا إلا ما نختار أن نظهره لهم، لكن الاختبار الحقيقي للأخلاق يكمن عند أهل بيتك، خلف الأبواب المغلقة .. خيركم خيركم لأهله.

10👏7

29 Jun 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ما زال يقيني راسخاً بأن طهارة القلب ونقاء السريرة من الأحقاد هما مفاتيح السعادة في رحلة الحياة، وأن النوايا البيضاء الخالصة ترسم لصاحبها أروع مسارات الاقدار، وأوقن تماماً أن أرزاق الخير تتدفق إلى المرء من أبوابٍ خفية بقدر ما يرجوه للناس، فالأرواح الصافية وان تعثرت لا تخذل أبداً..

7🕊2

29 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC992 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بدلاً من التطفل على خصوصيات من حولك حاول التطفل على المناطق المظلمة في عقلك، تلك البقع التي لم تحظَ بنعمة الفهم حتى الآن.

4👏3💯1

25 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,100 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من عجائب التدبير الإلهي، أنه إذا أحب الله أن يُعلي مقامك، قد يسخر لك حُساداً يذكرونك بالسوء أينما حلوا، يبذلون أقصى طاقاتهم للتقليل من شأنك وتصغيرك، ونسوا أن الخالق يجعل من مكرهم سلماً لنجاحك، هم يغرقون في وحل الإساءة والناس تكرهم، وأنت في كل مرة تُعرف وتكبر وتسمو أكثر.

8👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SHRYEEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مختارات 🌸
@izxxxz · 46,375
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
علي الطنطاوي .
@O8O8OO · 32,577
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
- مجرة وسط السماء 🖤 .
@majarrahsky · 96,445
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
اطمئن ♡︎
@uv_93 · 88,962
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
الصورة تقول
@oiiiii9 · 78,166
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
ادعيه ، اذكار ، مقاطع قرآن ،
@P_HSHS8 · 85,328
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
العقول الراقيه😌✍🏻
@ruutrgy · 142,885
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
لـِ أبّوي وُ أمّي.
@EEIIlD · 64,780
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
قناة الفلكي اليمني الجوبي
@ahmedaljoby55 · 51,905
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
ملاذ الرُوح ツ♥ُ .
@Malath_AlroOoh · 208,733
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
عالم الرجال
@Words_Men · 120,586
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
وَاقِع مُستخدَم.
@D_DDTD · 148,603
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
الترند - Trend
@gf2022Unive · 58,427
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
مكتبة المعلم اليمني🇾🇪
@libraryadel · 51,683
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شريان الامير♥” (@SHRYEEN), 2,130 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SHRYEEN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.