Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SILENKO AUTOcratia | авто под заказ из Кореи, Японии, Китая

Channel

SILENKO AUTOcratia | авто под заказ из Кореи, Японии, Китая

@SILENKO_AUTOcratia5

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

51,388subscribers

+1,271 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001374004
TypeChannel
Username@SILENKO_AUTOcratia5
DescriptionНадежные авто под заказ из Кореи, Японии и Китая - выгода до 30%🔥 Заказ авто: https://t.me/Silenko_AUTOcratia3_bot?start=6360 Поделиться каналом: https://t.me/+ljLI4sp_CqoyMTdi Телефон: 8 (923) 297 00 86
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SILENKO_AUTOcratia5

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,88951,38850,638.57 August 2026 — 50,117 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,117 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,190 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,400 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,396 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,202 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,094 subscribers15 August 2026 — 49,992 subscribers17 August 2026 — 49,889 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,418 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,318 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,498 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,435 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,314 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,196 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,131 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,313 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,247 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,169 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,334 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,254 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,181 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,555 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,455 subscribers4 September 2026 — 50,414 subscribers6 September 2026 — 50,362 subscribers9 September 2026 — 51,029 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,852 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,715 subscribers15 September 2026 — 50,663 subscribers17 September 2026 — 50,832 subscribers25 September 2026 — 51,388 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net +1,271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,664–51,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 10:4151,388+556
17 Sept 2026, 09:3950,832+169
15 Sept 2026, 07:5850,663-52
13 Sept 2026, 17:1950,715-137
11 Sept 2026, 22:3650,852-177
9 Sept 2026, 11:5851,029+667
6 Sept 2026, 05:3950,362-52
4 Sept 2026, 00:1650,414-41
2 Sept 2026, 14:1850,455-100
1 Sept 2026, 16:0350,555+374
31 Aug 2026, 13:4250,181-73
30 Aug 2026, 14:0850,254-80
29 Aug 2026, 12:0450,334+165
28 Aug 2026, 08:5550,169-78
27 Aug 2026, 08:2350,247-66
26 Aug 2026, 06:3650,313+182
25 Aug 2026, 07:4250,131-65
24 Aug 2026, 09:1250,196-118
22 Aug 2026, 17:1750,314-121
21 Aug 2026, 06:5250,435first reading

Engagement

219 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 51,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.394%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 219 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 106 of 122 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held219 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total161,760
Reactions total575
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,700
Videos
≈1,300
Links
≈1,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 36m
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

922 reactions across 184 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43847.5%
🔥30032.5%
👍768.24%
😁374.01%
💯181.95%
👏131.41%
👌111.19%
❤‍🔥101.08%
⚡90.976%
🤔50.542%
🏆30.325%
🎉10.108%
😍10.108%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 187 of the 219 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 922 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 219 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 219 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SILENKO_AUTOcratia5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 219 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC137 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

MAZDA CX-30 2024: КОГДА СЕДАН УЖЕ НЕ ХОЧЕТСЯ, А БОЛЬШОЙ КРОССОВЕР НЕ НУЖЕН 👀 Есть довольно частый запрос: «Хочу посадку повыше, но огромная машина мне не нужна» И здесь можно посмотреть на Mazda CX-30 2024 года 🚙 2,0 л / 158 л.с. ⚙️ автомат ➡️ передний привод 📍 встречаются варианты с пробегом около 20–30 тыс. км 💰 Ориентир по свежим предложениям - около 2,8 млн ₽ до Владивостока. Что получаем? — компактнее CX-5 — …

27 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC270 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

НОВАЯ РУБРИКА НА YOUTUBE - АВТОМОБИЛЬНЫЕ НОВОСТИ Запустили новый формат на нашем YouTube - теперь разбираем автомобильные новости. Что происходит на рынке, какие новинки выходят, какие треш или необычные события происходят, что меняется у брендов - в общем, все то, что может быть интересно тем, кто следит за автомобилями. Ниже прикрепим первые ролики 👇 [ССЫЛКА 1] [ССЫЛКА 2] И нам очень нужна ваша обратная связь: К…

27 Sept 2026, 11:20 UTC683 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Один из этапов пути машины до нашего клиента - забор с автовоза BMW X1 для Марии из г. Красноярск

❤1

27 Sept 2026, 10:51 UTC743 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Volkswagen Lavida для нашего клиента Георгия готов к вручению г. Москва 🔥

26 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

2024 ГОД, 50 000 КМ ИЛИ ХОРОШАЯ КОМПЛЕКТАЦИЯ - ЧТО ВЫБРАТЬ? Представим три машины одной модели: 🚗 первая - 2023 год, но пробег 20 000 км 🚗 вторая - 2024 год, но уже 50 000 км 🚗 третья - 2023 год и 40 000 км, зато хорошая комплектация Какую брать? Конечно, здесь нет универсального ответа. Год влияет на свежесть автомобиля и иногда - на условия его ввоза. Пробег показывает интенсивность эксплуатации, но 40–50 тысяч …

❤2

26 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

5 МАШИН, КОТОРЫЕ СТОИТ ПОСМОТРЕТЬ НА РЫНКЕ КИТАЯ 🇨🇳 1️⃣ Volkswagen Sagitar Если хочется понятный седан Volkswagen. Есть версии 2023 года с 1,4 л / 150 л.с. и небольшими пробегами. 2️⃣ Nissan Sylphy Спокойный семейный седан. Встречаются машины 2023 года с 1,6 л и пробегами около 30 тысяч км примерно от 1,4–1,6 млн ₽ до Владивостока. 3️⃣ Kia K3 Вариант для тех, кому хочется знакомый корейский седан без переплаты за …

❤1

26 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,150 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

TIGUAN 2024: ПОЧЕМУ ЕГО ДО СИХ ПОР ИЩУТ, КОГДА ВОКРУГ СТОЛЬКО НОВЫХ КРОССОВЕРОВ? 👀 Рынок сильно изменился. За те же деньги сегодня можно найти новый китайский кроссовер с огромным экраном, панорамой и десятком электронных опций. Но Volkswagen Tiguan всё равно остаётся в списке машин, которые рассматривают при подборе. Например, Tiguan L 2024 года: ⚙️ 1,5 л / 160 л.с. ⚙️ робот ⚙️ передний привод ⚙️ увеличенная колё…

❤2

25 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

КАКОЙ ПРОБЕГ УЖЕ СЧИТАТЬ БОЛЬШИМ? Очень частая ошибка при выборе машины: увидеть большой пробег → сразу закрыть объявление. Но сама цифра на одометре ещё не говорит, хорошая машина перед вами или плохая. Допустим, смотрим автомобиль 2023–2024 года: 20–30 тыс. км Для такого возраста это небольшой пробег. Но он всё равно не отменяет проверку состояния и истории. 40–60 тыс. км Уже заметная эксплуатация, но сама по с…

❤4

25 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,370 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ ДВЕ ОДИНАКОВЫЕ МАШИНЫ МОГУТ ОТЛИЧАТЬСЯ В ЦЕНЕ НА СОТНИ ТЫСЯЧ? На фото одна модель. Год одинаковый. Двигатель одинаковый. А одна машина стоит условно 1,2 млн, другая - 1,6 млн. Где подвох? На цену влияет намного больше, чем просто модель и год 👇 1️⃣ Пробег 15 тысяч км и 60 тысяч км - это уже два совершенно разных автомобиля. 2️⃣ Комплектация Внешне машины могут выглядеть почти одинаково, но внутри у одной бу…

❤2👍1

25 Sept 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ MAZDA CX-5 ДО СИХ ПОР ТАК ЧАСТО ВЫБИРАЮТ? 👀 Вокруг уже десятки новых кроссоверов с огромными экранами, подсветкой на полсалона и кучей электроники. А Mazda CX-5 всё равно продолжает оставаться одним из вариантов, которые люди стабильно рассматривают. Возьмём свежую CX-5 2024 года: ⚙️ 2,0 л / 155–156 л.с. ⚙️ классический автомат ⚙️ передний или полный привод - в зависимости от версии ⚙️ встречаются машины с п…

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 219 posts we hold for @SILENKO_AUTOcratia5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@SILENKO_AUTOcratia5 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTCAnonymous Poll188 voters

Какой бы авто вы выбрали?

  1. Кроссовер65%
  2. Седан26%
  3. Минивэн12%
  4. Спортивный автомобиль14%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 219 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SILENKO AUTOcratia | авто под заказ из Кореи, Японии, Китая” (@SILENKO_AUTOcratia5), 51,388 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SILENKO_AUTOcratia5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.