【SINGEN国际】 月满中秋,情满人间。感恩遇见,感谢相伴。愿这一轮明月照亮前路,也照见心中所念。愿所求皆如愿,所行皆坦途。中秋快乐!

Channel
导航 【SINGEN圣格诺国际外围】
@SINGENDH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
653subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001467764173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SINGENDH |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SINGENDH |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 653 | +5 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:23 | 648 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 648 | +11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 637 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 624 | +6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 618 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 620 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 621 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 653 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 177
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (26 April 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 354 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 11:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
😀 SINGEN 会员➕6 ⚡️圣品尊贵 ⚡️别具一格 ⚡️信诺千金 圣格诺提供专业安全私密的服务。保障您的约会体验,高端外围。定制服务,信誉第一,服务至上。信任为起点,服务无终点。把有限的精力专注每一个会员的约会体验。 🛍《会员对妹妹的评价反馈》 💎 心悦会员888特权 1.入会888抵扣1000(第2次使用) 2.消费满10次第11次直接白嫖 🔥 888会员专属处女资源 🔥 888会员专属明星资源 🔥 888会员专属女优资源 👇以下888会员独享查看资源👇 4.888会员专属包养资源 5.888会员专属网红资源 6.888会员专属VIP群 📱📱888心悦会员员特权权益解析 📌 《点我查看致老板咨询下单手册》 ➡️🐵4️⃣🙈5️⃣🙉6️⃣🙊7️⃣🐒👈 😃 【圣格诺官方客服】 😃 【被双向请联系机器人】 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
导航 【SINGEN圣格诺国际外围】 pinned a photo
📱📱📱📱 圣格诺国际外围
😀 SINGEN 会员➕8 ⚡️圣品尊贵 ⚡️别具一格 ⚡️信诺千金 圣格诺提供专业安全私密的服务。保障您的约会体验,高端外围。定制服务,信誉第一,服务至上。信任为起点,服务无终点。把有限的精力专注每一个会员的约会体验。 🛍《会员对妹妹的评价反馈》 💎 心悦会员888特权 1.入会888抵扣1000(第2次使用) 2.消费满10次第11次直接白嫖 🔥 888会员专属处女资源 🔥 888会员专属明星资源 🔥 888会员专属女优资源 👇以下888会员独享查看资源👇 4.888会员专属包养资源 5.888会员专属网红资源 6.888会员专属VIP群 📱📱888心悦会员员特权权益解析 📌 《点我查看致老板咨询下单手册》 ➡️🐵4️⃣🙈5️⃣🙉6️⃣🙊7️⃣🐒👈 😃 【圣格诺官方客服】 😃 【被双向请联系机器人】 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
😀 SINGEN 888心悦会员 ⚡️圣品尊贵 ⚡️别具一格 ⚡️信诺千金 圣格诺提供专业安全私密的服务。保障您的约会体验,高端外围。定制服务,信誉第一,服务至上。信任为起点,服务无终点。把有限的精力专注每一个会员的约会体验。 🛍《会员对妹妹的评价反馈》 💎 心悦会员888特权 1.入会888抵扣1000(第2次使用) 2.消费满10次第11次直接白嫖 🔥 888会员专属处女资源 🔥 888会员专属明星资源 🔥 888会员专属女优资源 👇以下888会员独享查看资源👇 4.888会员专属包养资源 5.888会员专属网红资源 6.888会员专属VIP群 📱📱888心悦会员员特权权益解析 📌 《点我查看致老板咨询下单手册》 ➡️🐵4️⃣🙈5️⃣🙉6️⃣🙊7️⃣🐒👈 😃 【圣格诺官方客服】 😃 【被双向请联系机器人】 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @SINGENDH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“导航 【SINGEN圣格诺国际外围】” (@SINGENDH), 653 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SINGENDH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.