Channel
@SMK_GREAT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001767475550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SMK_GREAT |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SMK_GREAT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 21 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 22 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 20 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نکته جالبی بود: چرا ما همش فک میکنیم روابط دیپلماتیک فقط سود میدهد؟ چرا فکر نمی کنیم سود خواهیم گرفت؟ البته جمهوری اسلامی رو باید از نگاه نرمال دیپلماتیک باید دور بریزیم چون کلا تو یه دنیای دیگه سیر میکنه @SMK_GREAT
Voice message, posted without a caption
با توجه به غارت و خیانت های چین و روسیه بعد از سرنگونی جمهوری اسلامی آیا موافق اشغال / نابودی سفارت روسیه و چین هستید؟
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خداوند یه عقلی به اینا بده یه پولی ام به ما 😐 @SMK_GREAT
👍4
از حقگویی های برتر استاد اتابکی (صدا کم) @SMK_GREAT
❤2
بنظرتون خفنترین سازمان اطلاعات و امنیت امروزی کدام سازمان است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کم حافظه ترین موجود دنیا ماهی نیست، بلکه انسان هایی هستند، محبت بیش از حد به آنان میکنی وقتی کسانی به دستانی که نانشان میداد مشت زدند محکومند به بوسیدن پاهایی که لگدشان میزند... @SMK_GREAT
❤2
وضعیت اروپای شرقی و غربی در آینده @SMK_GREAT
فقط آخرش که میگه باید شجاع باشه 😆 @SMK_GREAT
👏1🤔1
بنظر شما بعد از براندازی نظام جمهوری اسلامی با مقعد (حرم) خمینی چه باید کرد؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
در صورت تمایل بگید جزو کدا دسته از باورمندان هستید
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تراپی؟ نه ممنون میشینم فحش کشیدن شهرام شارلاتان لگن فروش دزد توسط سکویی رو میشنوم @SMK_GREAT
🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SMK_GREAT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با توجه به غارت و خیانت های چین و روسیه بعد از سرنگونی جمهوری اسلامی آیا موافق اشغال / نابودی سفارت روسیه و چین هستید؟
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بنظرتون خفنترین سازمان اطلاعات و امنیت امروزی کدام سازمان است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بنظر شما بعد از براندازی نظام جمهوری اسلامی با مقعد (حرم) خمینی چه باید کرد؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
در صورت تمایل بگید جزو کدا دسته از باورمندان هستید
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SMK_GREAT” (@SMK_GREAT), 21 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SMK_GREAT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.