Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 内置代理通知频道

Channel

内置代理通知频道

@SOCKS5daili

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,603subscribers

+925 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004378528941
TypeChannel
Username@SOCKS5daili
Created1 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SOCKS5daili

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6781,6031,140.57 August 2026 — 678 subscribers7 August 2026 — 694 subscribers15 August 2026 — 830 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,241 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,278 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,435 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,500 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,558 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,603 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 44 days, net +925. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 539–1,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:151,603+45
14 Sept 2026, 23:411,558+58
11 Sept 2026, 12:561,500+65
7 Sept 2026, 05:021,435+157
2 Sept 2026, 09:331,278+37
30 Aug 2026, 07:331,241+101
27 Aug 2026, 09:021,140+108
24 Aug 2026, 06:251,032+202
15 Aug 2026, 18:13830+136
7 Aug 2026, 13:27694+16
7 Aug 2026, 01:32678first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC641 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

使用前记得先把VPN关闭才能连接

1

5 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC737 viewsread 7 August 2026

稍等一下 机器人被注销了 正在操作 关注一下这个频道以防机器人再次被注销

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @SOCKS5daili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“内置代理通知频道” (@SOCKS5daili), 1,603 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SOCKS5daili.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.