28 measurements spanning 30 days, net -310. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,468–33,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 06:59
33,514
-23
3 Sept 2026, 09:18
33,537
-3
2 Sept 2026, 05:18
33,540
-12
1 Sept 2026, 07:28
33,552
-24
31 Aug 2026, 05:16
33,576
-14
30 Aug 2026, 01:52
33,590
-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:55
33,595
-15
28 Aug 2026, 07:45
33,610
-12
27 Aug 2026, 07:35
33,622
-6
26 Aug 2026, 06:44
33,628
-10
25 Aug 2026, 04:23
33,638
-22
24 Aug 2026, 00:13
33,660
-23
22 Aug 2026, 09:17
33,683
-14
20 Aug 2026, 21:43
33,697
-4
19 Aug 2026, 18:22
33,701
+10
18 Aug 2026, 19:03
33,691
-22
17 Aug 2026, 19:47
33,713
-18
16 Aug 2026, 19:48
33,731
-13
15 Aug 2026, 09:37
33,744
-4
13 Aug 2026, 23:47
33,748
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 18 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.58%
avg views ÷ 33,514 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.323%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
30 (18 June 2025 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
25,391
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,790
Videos
≈308
Links
≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
267 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
243
91.0%
👍
15
5.62%
🙏
6
2.25%
😁
2
0.749%
🥰
1
0.375%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2025 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dalam Islam, kewajiban suami adalah memberi nafkah, bukan menyerahkan seluruh penghasilannya kepada istri. Nafkah yang dimaksud adalah mencukupi kebutuhan istri dan keluarga dengan cara yang ma’ruf (layak dan wajar), sesuai kemampuan.
Allah Ta’ala berfirman, “Hendaklah orang yang mampu memberi nafkah menurut kemampuannya. Dan orang yang disempitkan rezekinya hendaklah memberi nafkah dari apa yang Allah berikan kepad…
Aksi Respon Bencana: Gempa NTT Memanggil Kepedulian Kita!
Bencana gempa bumi yang melanda Nusa Tenggara Timur telah menyisakan duka mendalam bagi saudara-saudara kita di sana. Banyak dari mereka yang kini kehilangan tempat tinggal dan membutuhkan bantuan darurat segera.
Melalui program Aksi Respon Bencana, MUHTAMM Lorong Peduli Umat mengajak Anda untuk ikut andil meringankan beban mereka dengan menyalurkan donasi t…
Seorang istri bukan hanya pendamping, tetapi juga penjaga amanah dalam rumah tangga. Di antara amanah terbesar itu adalah menjaga harta suami dengan sebaik-baiknya. Bukan hanya dari kehilangan yang besar, tetapi juga dari kebocoran kecil yang sering dianggap sepele seperti boros listrik, boros air, dan boros dalam belanja.
Lampu yang dibiarkan menyala tanpa kebutuhan, air yang terbuang sia-sia, hingga kebiasaan bela…
Sering kali kita mengira bahwa puncak kenikmatan adalah saat berhasil menggenggam harta, takhta, dunia, dan segala isinya. Padahal, ada yang jauh lebih mahal dari itu semua: lisan yang dimudahkan untuk mengucap ""Alhamdulillah.""
Rasulullah ﷺ bersabda,"Tidaklah Allah menganugerahi seorang hamba suatu nikmat, lantas hamba tersebut mengucapakkan, ""Alhamdulillah"", melainkan nikmat memuji Allah tersebut, lebih afdol d…
Ketika pria kaya, banyak wanita tertarik karena melihat ada unsur kemampuan memimpin, memberi nafkah, dan rasa aman. Namun ketika wanita kaya, tidak sedikit pria justru mundur, bukan semata karena tidak suka, tetapi karena khawatir kekayaan itu menjadi sebab dirinya diremehkan, dibanding-bandingkan, atau direndahkan ketika berumah tangga.
Banyak lelaki menjaga izzah dan tidak ingin masuk dalam hubungan yang berpoten…
Nabi shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam, beliau bersabda
ﺗَﻌِﺲَ ﻋَﺒْﺪُ ﺍﻟﺪِّﻳْﻨَﺎﺭِ ﺗَﻌِﺲَ ﻋَﺒْﺪُ ﺍﻟﺪِّﺭْﻫَﻢِ، ﺗَﻌِﺲَ ﻋَﺒْﺪُ ﺍﻟْﺨَﻤِﻴْﺼَﺔِ ﺗَﻌِﺲَ ﻋَﺒْﺪُ ﺍﻟْﺨَﻤِﻴْﻠَﺔِ ﺇِﻥْ ﺃُﻋْﻄِﻲَ ﺭَﺿِﻲَ ﻭَﺇِﻥْ ﻟَﻢْ ﻳُﻌْﻂَ ﺳَﺨِﻂَ
“Celakalah hamba dinar, celakalah hamba dirham, celakalah hamba khamisah dan khamilah (sejenis pakaian yang terbuat dari wool/sutera). Jika diberi ia senang, tetapi jika tidak diberi ia marah” HR. Bukhari
Ibn…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @SRB_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SRB_Official named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@akhwatsalafiyyah named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@jembermengajiofficial named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@markazmahabbatulquran named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Adi Hidayat Official @adihidayatofficial · 37,966 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 31 August 2026
Khalid Basalamah Official @khalidbasalamahofficial · 71,346 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@fiqihwanita_ @fiqihwanitaofficial · 31,321 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Manhaj Salaf @Manhaj_salaf1 · 34,431 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
SHAHIHFIQIH OFFICIAL @shahihfiqih · 42,585 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Muhammad Nuzul Dzikri @muhammadnuzuldzikri · 50,541 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Syafiq Riza Basalamah Official” (@SRB_Official), 33,514 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SRB_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
