وعَليك تعاركت من شِفت عالو بيك ولهسه اثار طكهم توجع صفاحي حِميتك وانا دَمي بطولي ضل يسيل وتكلهم عَلي سَكران مو صاحي ولك بعز المَعركه من كتلي اريد سلاح عِفت روحي بخَطر وانطيتك سلاحي . عباس الشمري

Channel
شعر شعبي عراقي
@SSS_SO0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,503subscribers
+741 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002146491460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SSS_SO0 |
| Created | Between 1 January 2024 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SSS_SO0 |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 16:11 | 50,503 | -199 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 50,702 | +2,647 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 48,055 | -260 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 48,315 | -547 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 48,862 | -63 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 48,925 | -84 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 49,009 | -41 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 49,050 | -94 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 49,144 | -100 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 49,244 | -63 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 49,307 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:28 | 49,338 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:03 | 49,348 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 49,354 | -31 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 49,385 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 49,393 | -27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 49,420 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 49,444 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 49,468 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 49,465 | first reading |
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.9%
- avg views ÷ 50,503 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,010
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (16 July 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 160,240 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 54 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SSS_SO0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
حَبيبي وداعتك تِتلاگه الوجوه وعلى كلشي نتحاسَب وحدة وحدة اجرحَك بالعتَب ماجرحك بسيف لأن جَرح العتَب مَحد يضمدة . جبار رشيد
يخوفني انتظارك وأشرد من الخوف وأحس حتى خيالك يمي تهديد انا بالگوه ناسي شجابك اليوم كل عقلك تردني وبالهوى نعيد انا باچي لحضرتك دجلة مرتين ولابسلك سواد بليلة العيد . علي السالم
أحنه ما نرهم سوية وحتى إذا نرهم بعد كُلش صعب اني ما أعرف أخون وأنت ماتعرف تحب ليش قويت العلاقة انت لو باقي غريب أنت ما تَرهم عدوي شلون ترهملي حبيب؟ محمد فرحان
وأنا البَلسم لجرحك وأنا اداويك وأنا لعيناكِ مرودها وكحلها ماعوفَك وأحن مٍن أمك عِليك واصيِر وياك مَريم وي طفِلها محبتك بالگَلب معگوده يهَواي عليها سوار ياهَو إلي يوصلَلهِا . عدنان الركابي
يا احله ما مخلوق بالدنيا والكُون بِعيونك الحِلوات حيل اني مَجنون شحَلاتك ياتَرف عندي وشبهاك صرت بلحور اوصفنك وشبهاك دوه جانونك ابكلبي وشبهاك جس نبضي تجد نارك سريه ..
كِلمن يشوف الشيب ها شَيبت كال ما يِدري بيض تصير هامات الجبال وَحك من نام طُول الليل والحاي بياض الشيب غطه الراس والحاي عليك ابروح كلمن مات والحي تِجي وتنصب جوادر حزن بيه .
ينشقُ جوفي ثُم يدخلُ قاتلي كَـ دخولُ ابراهيمَ للاصنامِ شعَجب جِدمك لدرب جفاي ساعة بوكت بي صدري كُوه النفس ساعة مدولب اربعه وعشرين ساعة صَنم ويخوزر ابراهيم بية .
يا ترف يا شيمة أهلك ياحرز شايل حِرز ياحلو ياصنعة الله اصفن بوجهك واسَافر ترمش عيُونك وأَفز . مظفر النواب
بيني وبين نفسي اشگد افكر بيك واگول اشمعنى انت الشاغل أظنوني مو اول عشگ خاطر نشل الحال ولا اول جمال اتشوفك عيوني شجاها الروح يمك ذبت الاسرار وليش ارجف عليك وينخطف لوني وحتى الناس گامت تعرف بهل الحال وما اعرف شگلمن من يسألوني يطبون بصفنتي وعنك ايدورون ويلگوني افكر بيك يلگوني . عريان السيد خلف
أحن لكلبك الما حن وأتلذذ بهجرك والوصل وياك وأذكرك وأبتسم ونوب أرد أحزن حلاة الذكرى من وياها دمعة تطيح شفتك تبتسم ركعة بصلاة الون سلام لكلبك الما حن وسلام لدمك البارد يل ما كتلي أجيك شبيه أفشل الروح ليش أكشخ وأنطرك چني متواعد إذا محتاجني أتعنى شوكك الراكد وإذا ماشيت غيرك ناس وإذا بـ أحضانهم قاعد أنا بس حاولت ليش أنحسب خوان ما دام الله يدري بقلبي بس واحد صنت زرعة وأنا بروحي مواسم جوع ومن سنبل ودادك كرصة ما حاصد أنا الغ…
اقوى من الخمر تأثيرك على الروح انعد عالسكارة وما ضكت كطره أنا ويا شوفتك داس عله جفني الليل ومو بجدامه داسه بحافر المهره يل تنعس كبل لا يطلع الخفاش أنا بلياك كاسر خاطر الكمره بس بالحلوة اشوفك بالفهاوة تروح وآنه مرافكك عالمره والمُره أنا من ابچي انشف هدومي مو الخدود انكع حالي حال الطالع بمطره . رائد أبو فتيان
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @SSS_SO0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@SSS_SO0 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@on_ng · 93,389#1
@c8cg0 · 4,179#2
@ZXIIXU · 9,951#3
@ghudfgytd · 2,026#4
@ee_vbc · 1,394#5
@Z00Z01 · 10,068#6
@danah146 · 347#7
@YIGCRT · 3,708#8
@hzhzhz8z · 1,545#9
@GD16k · 14,910#10
@Cool_7g · 5,314#11
@szovl · 11,689#12
@llQClll · 1,872#13
@Y_QIl · 279#14
@iioc7 · 34#15
@j6f56 · 419 (as read 25 August 2026)#16
@vvvvfll · 81,009#17
@shabohte · 9,984#18
@XG_64 · 172#19
@U_1_20 · 1,363#20
@Hi5nn · 3,747#21
@FYYAF · 4,753#22
@IILOIII11 · 651#23
@hmd2m · 10,897#24
@x8f82 · 857 (as read 25 August 2026)#25
@ch2005ch · 1,658#26
@mmaarrss315 · 1,334#27
@ll8rsj · 885#28
@UTITV · 4,674#29
@lierll · 791#30
@nl3lln · 113,427#31
@one_news2026 · 93,424#32
@MAANA6 · 7,840#33
@HeB1H1 · 95,227#34
@yo_9o · 11,433#35
@dhhsu2 · 162#36
@ixd21 · 3,630#37
@ff313n · 28,765#38
@yosfq16 · 1,555#39
@m9roil · 1,437#40
@Hadowsh · 3,135#41
@Dhffsbbxfn · 315#42
@maryem20056 · 122#43
@errzzl · 513,461#44
@ZOl96 · 530#45
@z70zit · 292#46
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sadyona · 20,056
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 September 2026
@sh3riraq · 91,764
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@OOOO_O0 · 107,817
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@iiuuum · 28,491
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 22 September 2026
@iraedo · 211,576
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@MV0MV · 39,087
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@Q3QQR · 47,920
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شعر شعبي عراقي” (@SSS_SO0), 50,503 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SSS_SO0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.