Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 — Hope won't be killed. (Closed)

Channel

𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 — Hope won't be killed. (Closed)

@SVTify

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

225subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002499117322
TypeChannel
Username@SVTify
CreatedBetween 1 November 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SVTify

Growth

225232228.513 August 2026 — 232 subscribers13 August 2026 — 232 subscribers21 August 2026 — 229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 225 subscribers13 August 202627 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 224–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:16225-4
21 Aug 2026, 00:44229-3
13 Aug 2026, 13:18232no change
13 Aug 2026, 01:48232first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 225 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (23 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total78
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC39 viewsread 13 August 2026

سلام از روزی که ما کیوم، هانی و گیو رو توی کیت من‌سیتی دیدیم :))

31 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC75 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @HooNeyDailYPhoto

سه بار اعدام برای یک کارگر و بیگناه ۳۸ ساله در بازار گل تهران سرپرست مادر ۸۰ ساله و یک برادر معلول او خودش هم با مشکل جدی آسم مواجه هست #احدشکوهیان توییت: Another life is at risk. Ahad Shokouhian, 38, has reportedly been sentenced to death three times by Branch 26 of Tehran Revolutionary Court. The world must not stay silent. Be his voice. #AhadShokouhian #StopExecutionsInIran توییت دوم: Another life is at risk in I

28 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC59 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @supsvt

🖇┊یه یادآوری کوچیک برای اینکه این روزها چند تا رای‌گیری مهم برای سونتین در جریانه و همگی باید نهایت تلاشمون رو برای موفقیت‌های بیشتر سونتین بکنیم. حتی چند دقیقه وقت گذاشتن از طرف هر کدوممون هم میتونه توی نتیجه تاثیرگذار باشه. 🩵 • رای‌گیری Broadcasting • رای‌گیری Kooky • رای‌گیری Korea Broadcasting Awards • رای‌گیری Fan Army 2026 • رای‌گیری FAN N STAR • آمادگی برای دبیوی پیچولین اگه هنوز رای ندادید یا آیتم‌های رای‌

28 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC53 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @supsvt

🖇┊ کارات‌، یادتون نره که ما فقط با استریم زدن می‌تونیم حمایتمون رو مستقیماً نصیب پسرا کنیم. این تنها کاریه که می‌تونیم برای تشکر از لبخندهایی که بهمون هدیه دادن بکنیم. پس یه لیست از پلی‌لیست‌ها و پست‌هایی که تو استریم بهتون کمک می‌کنن خدمت شما؛ ~ اواس‌تی Stay with me از دوکیوم ~ کاور ear از جاشوآ ~ موزیک Mi-cheo Mi-cheo از پیچولین ~ مینی آلبوم 吉BOARD از پیچولین ~ موزیک SSFW از ونوو ~ آلبوم V8 از وی‌ایت ~ استریم‌ مو

28 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

دومی و آخری که عرزشین و هیچی، انتظاری نیست. من فقط به این فکر می‌کنم که رگا با تریبون چند میلیونیش چقدر توانایی کمک داشته و ساکت مونده.

😭7

28 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC41 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @unpaidjester

بچه‌ها اگه بات‌ها و چنل‌هارو دارید لطف کنید بایکوت کنید. پرشین توییکس هیدن چت رگاپلاس پرژن میم بات (Persian meme bot)

28 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC60 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomanposhti

🔘 آموزش و نصب توییتر برای توییت زدن. • نکاتی که باید درمورد توییت زدن بدانید. • آموزش فضای توییتر. • ایمن‌سازی توییتر و اطلاعات شخصی. • بازنویسی توییت‌ها برای بهتر دیده شدن. 🔘 همه چیز درمورد لیمیت شدن. 🔘 لیستی از خبرگزاری‌های جهانی و افراد فعال در حوزه اجتماعی که می‌تونید زیر توییت‌های بازداشتی‌ها و افراد در خطر اعدام تگ‌شون کنید. - • صفحات توییتر فعالین حقوق بشر برای تگ کردن. • صفحات توییتر رسانه‌های خارجی برای تگ

28 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC41 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @harinmood

شش ماه پیش از شروین باقریانِ ۱۸ ساله نوشتم که در مصاحبه‌ا‌ش‌ نمی‌دونست “محاربه” یعنی چی. حالا دوباره می‌نویسم‌ که هنوز در خطر اعدامه‌. ریتوییت کنین.

28 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC46 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @harinmood

می‌گن‌ فردا بازداشتی‌های‌ دی‌ماه‌ رو اعدام می‌کنن‌‌، این‌ها رو نشر بدین و ری‌توییت‌ کنین: اول - دوم - سوم - چهارم - پنجم - ششم - هفتم - هشتم - نهم - دهم

28 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC36 viewsread 13 August 2026

لیست ریتوییت برای اعدامیان اصفهان : توییت اول توییت دوم توییت سوم توییت چهارم توییت پنجم توییت ششم توییت هفتم توییت هشتم توییت نهم توییت دهم توییت یازدهم توییت دوازدهم توییت سیزدهم توییت چهاردهم توییت پانزدهم توییت شانزدهم توییت هفدهم توییت هجدهم توییت نوزدهم ریتوییت ها : ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریت

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SVTify. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,136,329 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 — Hope won't be killed. (Closed)” (@SVTify), 225 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SVTify.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.