Channel
@SZreport00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002649440853 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SZreport00 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SZreport00 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 96 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 93 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 92 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 92 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (9 October 2025 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
验证留名： H 验证时间： 8/29 老师花名： #宁宁 城市坐标： #深圳 #福田 上课花费： 799 颜值身材： 9.5分/10 服务内容： 裸足、舔、亲、足出 出击体验： 算是素人类型，身材很好，jio很漂亮，真的有种小朋友脚脚的感觉。刚开始先聊天，感觉她挺善解人意，沟通起来也很舒服，整体氛围很自然，有种女朋友的感觉。过程中节奏拿捏得很好，有快有慢，互动感和体验感都不错，脚法也挺好。整体下来非常满意，是一次很开心的体验，会再来。 优点缺点： 优点基本说不完，暂时真的想不到什么明显缺点。颜值、身材、态度和沟通都在线，整体体验很好。 推荐程度： 10/10 综合颜值、身材、服务、态度以及整体体验来看，个人觉得这个价位非常值得，喜欢这一口的话可以考虑。 联系方式： @szhin007
妞妞1199测评 整体长相不错，个子高，腿很长，🐻B+,服务该有的都有，可以不隔裤摸↓，🐍。 胸部敏感，下边敏感，水分足。 特别能说，也很直接的撩骚，在一起一个小时不冷场，很愉快。 喜欢腿长的可以冲啦
❤1
新人湘妹“兰兰”好评继续 ☝️服务顶级，柔情似水☝️ 完美恋爱体验
❤1
宁宁1199测评 川妹子，🐻至少C,不是第一眼美女，但是确实是个温婉的川妹子，服务真的好，肉肉的摸起来很舒服，问题是她自己也很享受，身材是标准的炮架子，肉肉的总是在想象搞起来会有多舒服。 浑身都敏感，水很多，皮肤很好，总之是一个相处起来很舒服的女孩，喜欢邻家女孩感的可以试试。
湘妹“兰兰”好评持续袭来 ☝️服务顶级，柔情似水☝️ 完美恋爱体验 ▶️点击兰兰更多的照片和评价 🧐🧐🧐：@maozi299
❤3
超级新人小晴，每日好评不断！ 服务颜值双拉满！ 惊为天人！
超级新人小晴好评不断！ 在路上碰到了，仔细观察了很久，不是第一眼大美女，但是颜值特别耐看，且眼波流转显得格外动人。看上去不胖，但是真有料，🐻真大。 服务没的说，🐍，摸↓都没问题，且特别敏感，容易抖动。↓干净又嫩还有很多的水[偷笑]整体评价，近期为数不多的顶级妹子，非常上头，值得一试。
超级新人小晴，好评不断！ 身材服务颜值样样拉满！
超级新人-小晴 首日好评新鲜出炉
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «深圳TT女仆反馈频道»
验证留名：rodger 验证时间：2026.4.4 老师花名：棠棠 城市坐标：#深圳 #南山 上课花费：699 颜值身材：10分/10 服务内容：丝足 出击体验：今天本来约的另一家spa馆，结果踩雷了，老师和照片差距太大。正好看到这边位置离这边不是很远于是火速出击，到地方了等老师就位，人照有8分像，兄弟们完全可以相信资料馆的照片。今天约的老师初见很高冷，但属于是慢热型，熟悉了以后就会发现很好聊。提的要求老师都会尽量满足，如果兄弟们对衣服有要求需要提前和客服说。总之是一次非常好的体验，也是下次一定会再来的地方😋 推荐程度：10/满分10.0分； 联系方式：@szhin007
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SZreport00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳TT女仆反馈频道” (@SZreport00), 96 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZreport00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.