Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for S-VHS

Channel

S-VHS

@S_VHS_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,209subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001895019885
TypeChannel
Username@S_VHS_channel
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/S_VHS_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2091,2281,218.57 August 2026 — 1,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,228 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,222 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,220 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,218 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,217 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,218 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,217 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,215 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,209 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 36 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,206–1,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 01:201,209-6
7 Sept 2026, 14:001,215-2
3 Sept 2026, 00:031,217-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:251,218+1
21 Aug 2026, 01:041,217-1
17 Aug 2026, 15:291,218-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:151,220-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:441,222-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:011,228no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:571,228first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10436.0%
7024.2%
🎉3512.1%
👍217.27%
🍾113.81%
😁113.81%
🌚62.08%
👏62.08%
💯62.08%
😢62.08%
41.38%
🤣41.38%
😱31.04%
😍10.346%
🙏10.346%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @S_VHS_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC75 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сделал Стереобату отдельный аккаунт в инстаграме, выкладываю туда всякое странное. https://www.instagram.com/stereo.bat Подписывайтесь;)

👍105🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC101 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот за что люблю Литрес - всегда свежие новинки!

🍾6💯6

13 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC203 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В одном литературном чате обсуждали Бабеля: что он дескать был неприятный достаточно человек. Я пошутил, что вообще являюсь сторонником идеи «Смерти автора», и что Сталин кстати тоже, но есть нюанс. Ни одного лайка:(

😁11😱3👍2

10 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC227 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну всё, астрологи объявили год аналогового хоррора и лиминальности. Вот бы кто-нибудь роман написал на эту тему… oh wait https://youtu.be/pxtQ1oKmhds?is=x_G3tJQlS_579pGY

🌚64👏1

21 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC235 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой отзыв от Алёны (её канал https://t.me/WordsTherapy)

🔥125

19 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC153 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мне кажется нашему каналу не повредит дикпик

🤣43

19 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC204 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @babushkinschoolPhoto

Это Давид. Он очень занят. Постоянно рекламирует то качалку, то как член увеличить, то авиабилеты. Сегодня он рекламирует наш опен-колл. У него хорошее, странное выражение лица. Давида называли: – сосредоточенным – напряжённым – гневным – суровым – грозным – задумчивым Мне он кажется слегка растерянным. Правильного ответа нет, конечно. Все эти чувства мы испытываем – накануне. До Микенланджело все лепили Давид

5

17 Jun 2026, 19:05 UTC180 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня прошёл звонок с бета-ридерами. Есть интересные фидбеки, кое-что придётся править (но не радикально, и то хорошо). Есть хорошие отзывы: говорят, читать интересно. В общем, жить будем:)

🔥168👍3👏2🙏1

12 Jun 2026, 17:15 UTC251 views25 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Наверное есть смысл рассказать о дальнейших планах по «Стереобату». Я жду результаты бета-ридинга (нет ли несостыковок, сильно непонятных вещей и тп), после чего скорее всего буду ещё править текст. Также отправил его на оценку нескольким профессионалам, прежде всего, чтобы понять вообще возможность публикации в российских издательствах. В тексте есть элементы, которые могут не пройти по новым законам о пропаганде

15🔥9👍1

4 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC263 views62 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Я дописал "Стереобат"

🎉35🔥108🍾5👏31

20 May 2026, 04:58 UTC326 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

- откройте ссылку https://stereobat.ru/ - закройте глаза - откройте глаза - выпавшее слово - ваш гороскоп на сегодня Делитесь в комментариях #стереобат

🔥7😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @S_VHS_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S-VHS” (@S_VHS_channel), 1,209 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_VHS_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.