Channel
@SaLamatnike
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,341subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001357674753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SaLamatnike |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SaLamatnike |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Cafeshge | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–0) |
| @zooje_khoshbkht | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–0) |
| @Hamsar_jaan | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–0) |
| @Mgwomen | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @zooje_khoshbkht. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 9,341 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 9,354 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 9,366 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 9,386 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 9,399 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 9,408 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 9,418 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 9,428 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 9,434 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 9,440 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 9,453 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 9,462 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 9,464 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 9,469 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 9,469 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 27 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
222 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 53.6% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 41.0% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.25% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.80% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟢چه فرقی میکند که مقصر تو باشی یا همسرت؟!! نگذارید این دنبال مقصر بودنها فاصلهای بینتان بیندازد. مبادا در این میان غریبهای فاصله را پُر کند! نگذارید «ما» بودنتان تبدیل به «من» شود، نگذارید قهرهایتان عادی شود. باور کنید یک «جانم گفتن»، میگشاید تمام اَخمهای مردانه را، یک «آغوش محکم»، تمام میکند لجاجتهای زنانه را باور کنید کِیف دارد در کنار عشق بودن ♥️
❤6
🚹 مرد، مشتاقِ عکس العمل زن است! برای یک مرد تجربه جالبی نیست اگر در حین #معاشقه و #نزدیکی، متوجه شود او باید همه حرکات و تصمیمات را بگیرد و طرف مقابل فقط آنجا است که ببیند حرکت بعدی مرد چه خواهد بود! برای یک مرد خیلی جالب است بفهمد طرف مقابلش در بستر، چقدر از خود هیجان نشان می دهد و مشتاق اتفاقی است که هر دو انتظار دارند بوجود بیاید. 🚺اگر یک زن در بستر فقط دراز بکشد و هیچ واکنشی نشان ندهد، اولین سئوالی که به ذهن…
❤3
◽️دعواهای بیهوده با همسر ▫️هر انسان متاهلی با همسر خود بر سر مسائلی بحث میکند، از باز گذاشتن سر خمیردندان تا آویزان کردن لباس روی دستگیره در که در نظر دیگران بی معنی است. ▫️بحثهای خود را برای مسائل مهمتری نگه دارید، این دلخوریها را به حال خود بگذارید. ▫️به راستی اگر تنها اشتباه همسر شما انداختن جورابهای کثیف روی زمین است، باید خودتان را خوششانس بدانید.
👍2❤1
🔷سندروم اتللو چیست؟ 🔹سندروم اتللو حسادتی بیمارگونه ناشی از تفکر اشتباه درباره خیانت شریک زندگی است. ممکن است این مشکل روانی گاهی به خشونت منجر شود، بنابراین درمان آن اهمیت زیادی دارد و به دوام رابطه کمک میکند. حسادت هذیانی یا سندروم اتللو ناشی از اختلالی در سلامت روانی است که با سایر بیماریهای روانی مانند اسکیزوفرنی، اختلالات اضطرابی و اختلالات شخصیت ارتباط دارد. 🔹افرادی که دچار توهمات حسادت هستند این باور غیرمنط…
❤2
⭕️ 10 قانون طلایی برای یک رابطه شاد و موفق: 1. هر روز با هم حرف بزنید؛ از هر چیزی. سکوت، بینتون فاصله میندازه. 2. با مشکل بجنگید، نه با همدیگه. یادتون باشه شما در یه تیم هستید. 3. هیچ رازی بینتون نمونه، صداقت اعتماد میسازه 4. بیشتر از چیزی که میگیرید وسط بذارید، عشق حساب و کتاب نیست. 5. قدردانی تون رو بلند بگید، انتقادتون رو نرم بگید. حرفها میتونن هم خوب کنن هم زخمی... 6. نذارید غرور برنده بشه، حتی وقتی سخته عذرخواه…
❤9
7 جمله دردسر ساز در دعواهای زناشویی 🔹برای آنکه یک بحث لفظی بین زوجین، تبدیل یک مبارزه بوکس نشود، برخی جملات و رفتارها را هرگز نباید به کار برد. 🔸تو شغلت را به خانواده ترجیح میدهی! 🔹 در خانه هیج کاری نمیکنی! 🔸 مادرت غیرقابل تحمله! 🔹 تو به من گوش نمیکنی! 🔸 دیگر نمیتوانم به تو اعتماد کنم! 🔹 تو یک احمق هستی! 🔸در پیغام متنی: "تو هیچ وقت هیچی نمیفهمی!"
این کلیپ از آموزش نحوه صحیح رابطه جنسی توی دوران بارداری، بیش از 50 میلیون بازدید داشته!
❤7👏3
بهترین روش برای جلوگیری بعد از فرزند اول گذاشتن دستگاه آی یو دی میباشد بهترین روش جلوگیری برای کسانی که تا بحال زایمان نکرده اند قرص های جلوگیری از بارداری و یا کاندوم میباشد بهترین روش برای کسانی که دیر تصمیم به بچه دار شدن ندارند بستن لوله ها میباشد.
❤5
جمله هایی که تو دعوا نباید به همسرت بگی : ۱. "باید جدا بشیم" جدایی یک تصمیم سخت و بسیار منطقی هستش، زمان عصبانیت که ضربان قلبت ۱۲۰ به بالاعه زمان خوبی برای تصمیم گیری نیست! ۲. "کاش مجرد بودم و هیچوقت وارد این زندگی نمیشدم" گفتن این جمله به معنای نادیده گرفتن کل خاطرات و لحظات خوبتون هست و اثر منفی میزاره روی رابطتتون ۳. "از فلانی یاد بگیر ببین چیکار کرده" کلا مقایسه کردن، احساس ناکافی بودن به طرف مقابل میده و مشاجره…
👍5❤3
یه روانشناسی میگفت: بسیاری از رابطه ها شکست می خورند، چون بعضی زنان یاد نگرفته اند چگونه با یک مرد رفتار کنند؛ فقط یاد گرفته اند که یک مرد چگونه باید با آنها رفتار کند.
👍21👎1
⭕️ نشونه های کسی که سواد رابطه داره: - نسبت به جمله ی «دوستت دارم» احساس مسئولیت میکنه! - اگه رفتار شما اذیتش کرد بدون توهین و تیکه انداختن بهتون میگه! - میدونه که شما باید از زندگیتون لذت ببرین و دوستایی داشته باشین. - برای خوشحالی شما تلاش میکنه. - تو هر شرایط ویژه ای سعی میکنه کنارتون باشه تا احساس تنهایی نکنین - هدفش از رابطه با شما مشخصه! - شما رو همینطوری که هستین دوست داره؛ مثلا اگه چاق یا لاغرین یا اخلاق خاص…
❤7👍4👎1
در دعواهای زناشویی اگر هدفت این است که ثابت کنی “حق با توست” هر دو نفرتان بازنده هستید. در رابطه برنده وجود ندارد؛ یا هر دو میبرید با حل مشکل یا هر دو میبازید با شکستن دل هم. مقابل همسر ایستادن را تمام کنید، کنار او، عليه مشكل بايستيد.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @SaLamatnike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“همسرداری ❤عشق 💜زناشویی” (@SaLamatnike), 9,341 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaLamatnike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.