🌙 سفر درون گاهی باید از خودت بپرسی: من واقعاً همین زندگی رو میخواستم؟ یا فقط به چیزی عادت کردم که هر روز تکرارش میکنم؟ همهچیزهایی که بهشون عادت کردیم، لزوماً انتخابهای درستی نیستن.
🎉5🥰4👏2🔥2👍1

Channel
@SafarDarooon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,965subscribers
+9,324 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001007964303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SafarDarooon |
| Created | 15 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SafarDarooon |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 10,965 | -174 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:15 | 11,139 | -125 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 11,264 | -30 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:54 | 11,294 | -19 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 11,313 | -26 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 11,339 | +8,586 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 2,753 | +917 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 1,836 | -320 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 2,156 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 2,164 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 2,178 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 2,189 | -175 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 2,364 | -31 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 2,395 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 2,397 | -41 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 2,438 | -160 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 2,598 | -65 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 2,663 | -39 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 2,702 | -45 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 2,747 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (21 December 2025 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,465 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
882 reactions across 37 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 233 | 26.4% | |
| 🥰 | 227 | 25.7% | |
| 🎉 | 138 | 15.6% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 13.4% | |
| 🔥 | 101 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 6.58% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.454% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.227% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.113% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌙 سفر درون گاهی باید از خودت بپرسی: من واقعاً همین زندگی رو میخواستم؟ یا فقط به چیزی عادت کردم که هر روز تکرارش میکنم؟ همهچیزهایی که بهشون عادت کردیم، لزوماً انتخابهای درستی نیستن.
🎉5🥰4👏2🔥2👍1
🪞 سفر درون تا حالا فکر کردی چند بار برخلاف خواسته قلبیات رفتار کردی، فقط برای اینکه کسی از تو ناراحت نشه؟ چند بار سکوت کردی تا رابطهای خراب نشه؟ و چند بار خودت رو فراموش کردی تا دیگران احساس خوبی داشته باشن؟ شاید وقتشه یک بار هم طرف خودت بایستی...
🎉5🥰4🔥3👏2👍1
یک روز از خواب بیدار میشوی و دیگر دلت نمیخواهد چیزی را ثابت کنی. نه اینکه شکست خورده باشی؛ فقط دیگر ارزش خودت را با نگاه دیگران اندازه نمیگیری. دیگر برای هر رفتنی التماس نمیکنی، برای هر نپسندیدنی تغییر نمیکنی، و برای هر سکوتی خودت را مقصر نمیدانی. آن روز، شاید دنیا هیچ تغییری نکرده باشد؛ اما تو دیگر آدم سابق نیستی. 🕊
🥰1
تنهایی همیشه به معنی نبودن آدمها نیست… گاهی میان دهها نفر نشستهای و هیچکس نمیداند در سرت چه میگذرد. میخندی، حرف میزنی، زندگی میکنی؛ اما گوشهای از وجودت منتظر کسیست که بدون توضیح دادن، تو را بفهمد. و شاید روزی بفهمی اولین کسی که باید تو را بفهمد، خودت هستی. 🌒 سفر درون، از همینجا آغاز میشود.
🥰1
از آن بخشِ وجودت که دوستش نداری فرار نکن… از حسادتت، از ترست، از نیازت به دیدهشدن، از آن خشم قدیمی که هنوز جایی درونت زنده است. قرار نیست هر چیزی را که در خودت پیدا میکنی، دوست داشته باشی؛ اما باید جرئت دیدنش را داشته باشی. آدم تا وقتی خودش را انکار میکند، اسیر همان چیزهاییست که از آنها فرار میکند. گاهی رهایی، از یک اعتراف ساده شروع میشود: «من هم این بخش از وجودم را دارم.» 🪞
🥰1
یکی از سختترین لحظههای زندگی، وقتیست که میفهمی بعضی از چیزهایی که برایشان جنگیدی، اصلاً ارزش اینهمه جنگیدن را نداشتند. نه آدمهایی که برای ماندنشان خودت را فراموش کردی، نه رابطههایی که در آنها همیشه تو باید میفهمیدی، نه تأییدی که برای گرفتنش از خواستههای خودت گذشتی. بلوغ، گاهی یعنی دست کشیدن؛ نه از روی ناتوانی، بلکه از روی شناخت. 🥀
🥰2
گاهی آنقدر نقش آدمِ قوی را بازی میکنی که یادت میرود کجا واقعاً خسته شدی… همه تو را به صبوری میشناسند، اما هیچکس نمیپرسد چقدر از خودت گذشتی تا دیگران آرام بمانند. شاید وقتش رسیده این بار بهجای اینکه حال همه را خوب کنی، حال خودت را بفهمی. 🖤 سفر درون؛ جایی که دیگر لازم نیست وانمود کنی.
🥰1
پیرمردی کهنسال میگفت: «در زندگی فهمیدم لازم نیست همیشه آخرین حرف را من بزنم؛ بعضی وقتها سکوت، هم حرمت آدم را نگه میدارد، هم آرامشش را. فهمیدم هرکس کنارم ماند، قرار نیست تا آخر بماند و هرکس رفت، قرار نیست دشمنم باشد. بعضیها فقط تا جایی از راه همقدممان هستند. دلم میخواست این را زودتر بفهمم: نه برای راضیکردن همه زندگی کن، نه آنقدر از فردا بترس که امروزت را نبینی. با آدمها مهربان باش، اما خودت را از یاد نبر.…
❤1
📚 درس امروز از کتاب روانشناسی پول یکی از مهمترین تفاوتهای درآمد و ثروت اینه: درآمد، پولیه که به دست میاری. ثروت، بخشی از داراییه که میتونی حفظ و انباشته کنی. ممکنه کسی درآمد بالایی داشته باشه، اما بهخاطر هزینههای زیاد، پسانداز کمی داشته باشه. در مقابل، فردی با درآمد متوسط میتونه با مدیریت هزینهها و تصمیمهای حسابشده، بهمرور دارایی بسازه. برای همین، فقط افزایش درآمد کافی نیست. باید یاد بگیری: چقدر خرج کنی، …
👏28🥰16🎉14👍8🔥3❤1
یک روز باید دست از محاکمهی خودت برداری. برای انتخابهایی که با عقلِ امروزت اشتباه به نظر میرسند، اما با فهمِ آن روزت، بهترین کاری بودند که بلد بودی. گذشته را نمیشود عوض کرد؛ اما میشود از آن یاد گرفت، بزرگ شد و دیگر همان آدم سابق نبود. گاهی مهمترین سفر زندگی، برگشتن به سمتِ خودت است. 🤍
🥰25👏19👍10🎉7🔥2
گاهی سفر درون از جایی شروع میشود که نه دنیا را مقصر میدانی، نه خودت را سرزنش میکنی؛ فقط آرام کنار نسخهٔ خستهات مینشینی و میپرسی: «اینهمه وقت چه دردی را تنهایی تحمل کردی؟» بعضی زخمها درمان نمیشوند چون هیچوقت فرصت نکردهایم صدایشان را بشنویم. همیشه خواستهایم قوی باشیم، ادامه بدهیم و وانمود کنیم چیزی نشده است. اما شاید امروز لازم نباشد خودت را درست کنی؛ فقط کافیست برای چند لحظه، خودت را بفهمی… اگر بیقضاوت …
👏31🥰24🎉11👍6🔥5
تمامِ رشد، اضافهکردن نیست؛ گاهی باید توقعی را کنار بگذاری، رابطهای را رها کنی یا باری را زمین بگذاری. این بار از خودت نپرس: «چطور قویتر باشم؟» بپرس: «چه چیزی را دیگر نباید با خودم حمل کنم؟»
👏18🥰18👍12🎉8🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @SafarDarooon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SafarDarooon named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌿 سفردرون” (@SafarDarooon), 10,965 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SafarDarooon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.