Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net -2,205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,438–14,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 15:47
11,769
-4
24 Oct 2026, 17:58
11,773
-3
23 Oct 2026, 21:00
11,776
-17
22 Oct 2026, 22:00
11,793
+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:38
11,792
-11
20 Oct 2026, 17:00
11,803
-6
19 Oct 2026, 17:06
11,809
-17
18 Oct 2026, 19:30
11,826
-11
17 Oct 2026, 21:56
11,837
-9
16 Oct 2026, 22:46
11,846
-7
15 Oct 2026, 23:56
11,853
-11
15 Oct 2026, 03:11
11,864
-5
14 Oct 2026, 02:09
11,869
-23
11 Oct 2026, 10:20
11,892
-36
7 Oct 2026, 02:21
11,928
-55
2 Oct 2026, 06:20
11,983
-72
18 Sept 2026, 16:37
12,055
-6
16 Sept 2026, 06:37
12,061
-2
14 Sept 2026, 11:41
12,063
-20
13 Sept 2026, 00:18
12,083
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 29 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
25
29.1%
❤
23
26.7%
🔥
18
20.9%
😁
5
5.81%
⚡
3
3.49%
❤🔥
2
2.33%
👏
2
2.33%
💯
2
2.33%
🌚
1
1.16%
🍾
1
1.16%
🕊
1
1.16%
😱
1
1.16%
🤔
1
1.16%
🥰
1
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Just created my agent on yzailabs.com
YZai Labs is an AI Agent-led venture capital platform. Users create AI Agents with independent wallets that invest, trade, and earn profits automatically.
They are currently running a sale that only allows Agents to participate. You can now create your own Agent on their website and use it to help yourself join the sale
X: x.com/yzai_labs
TG: t.me/yzai_labs
The founder of metawin is giving away $100k on Saturday to 500 people!
That's $200 per person...
make sure you have an account created on metawin.com and follow the instructions in the post
one of the easiest giveaways to enter, i wouldn't fade this
https://x.com/skel/status/2092283690923556949?s=20
BSC play and I am hoping long term only 8k rn
• Automated Capital Deployment: Every buy and sell triggers a 4% tax that is instantly routed into active yield farms to generate yield.
• Dual Yield Split: Generated yield is split 50/50—half compounds back into the farms to grow the capital base, and half buys back $UP.
• Perpetual Growth Loop: Higher trading volume creates more farm capital, driving exponentially larg…
Ive been telling you guys. Just been watching this bag grow this month
▪️ The only platform in the world approved to run an open discovery feed with adult content behind it and ZERO 18+ wall at the home page. Approved by our card processor's compliance leadership this week. Every competitor has the gate. OnlyFans has no gate but also no discovery feed.
▪️ A real platform, live today, not a roadmap: every creator is…
One of you just hit 16,875x??
I just watched someone turn $7.50 into over $126,000 on MetaWin
They just committed to giving away $500,000 to their players over the next 2 weeks
If you deposit on metawin.com you qualify for the rewards
I would go get your share of these giveaways while they last
This was too funny not to buy $BOOOBS
https://x.com/Boobiesbounty/status/2085896532868333791
Just launched Should be a slow moon if it catches
Ca ends in BOOBS
https://forgepad.fun/solana/token/6tKBG6hv56Hfb3HZkRBpvXr7LtSMzqZ3gbNiDGDJBooB
This looks like a solid cook. The dude is going super viral
https://t.me/QuentinCommunity
❤3
Signed Achilles
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Safehavencalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Safehavencalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@beauxthedog named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CaesarsCalls @Caesars_Calls · 38,554 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Bruisers Calls @bruiserscalls · 32,003 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟 @cryptogems555 · 23,850 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Shill Seals @ShillSeals · 18,842 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
Koba's Calls @kobascalls · 31,150 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Gems Mine @MineGems · 25,001 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Gubbins Calls @gubbinscalls · 25,915 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 | LionCalls.io @LionCALL · 80,119 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
WHALES SAILORS @whalesailors · 22,226 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
𝐆𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐃𝐈𝐆𝐆𝐄𝐑’𝐒 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐒 @golddigerscalls · 22,716 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
VenoMCalls @venomcalls · 35,093 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Apostle Edu Udechukwu @Apostle_Edu · 24,218 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Achilles SafeHaven Calls” (@Safehavencalls), 11,769 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Safehavencalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.