26 measurements spanning 27 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,108–10,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 18:15
10,146
-1
1 Sept 2026, 19:15
10,147
-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:13
10,148
-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:33
10,149
-8
28 Aug 2026, 15:16
10,157
+5
27 Aug 2026, 13:04
10,152
-1
26 Aug 2026, 12:28
10,153
+3
25 Aug 2026, 12:12
10,150
-16
24 Aug 2026, 15:07
10,166
-5
22 Aug 2026, 22:55
10,171
+3
21 Aug 2026, 09:46
10,168
-10
20 Aug 2026, 13:03
10,178
+4
19 Aug 2026, 14:12
10,174
-21
18 Aug 2026, 15:24
10,195
+2
17 Aug 2026, 15:27
10,193
+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:57
10,191
+4
14 Aug 2026, 20:07
10,187
+9
13 Aug 2026, 13:58
10,178
+2
12 Aug 2026, 11:23
10,176
+3
11 Aug 2026, 11:42
10,173
first reading
Engagement
111 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.2%
avg views ÷ 10,146 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,180
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 111 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
111 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
463,747
Reactions total
7,440
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 04s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,440 reactions across 111 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,255
30.3%
👍
1,742
23.4%
❤🔥
936
12.6%
😁
914
12.3%
🔥
825
11.1%
👏
246
3.31%
custom 5249166827099011082
104
1.40%
🤝
97
1.30%
🤩
69
0.927%
🥰
57
0.766%
🍓
55
0.739%
💋
43
0.578%
😱
40
0.538%
😍
23
0.309%
😢
21
0.282%
🤔
12
0.161%
💔
1
0.013%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 111 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SaferoStreamInfo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 111 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пятничный вечер - это хороший повод для инсайдов?
Еще одна параллельная другим разработка которая уже находится на приличном этапе. На шрифт внимание не обращайте, взят дефолтный во время разработки тех. части, очевидно.
Объявляю комментарии: "лучшибдругое сделали" запущенными! Ответ на них не изменился, и он тут: https://t.me/SaferoStreamInfo/3953
Всем веселой пятницы и легкой субботы! И это, аккуратнее там с вес…
Со следующим патчем классы:
🟠Bishop
🟠Elven Elder
🟠Shillien Elder
Смогут устанавливаться следующие виды татуировок:
🟠+ WIT / - INT
🟠+ MEN / - INT
Напоминаю, что:
INT отвечает за прохождение дебафов, урон от маг. умений, шанс мана берна.
MEN отвечает за M.Def., Max. MP и MP regeneration, а также за защиту от маг. дебафов.
DEX это скорость бега и шанс блока щитом.
Мы немного расширяем вариативность дефолтных татуиро…
Сегодня снился сон.
Я еще молодой, волосы на голове есть, мы на эпике, ТОПовый клан бьет босса и вокруг него 6 кланов оппозиции, каждый сам по себе.
Дак вот эти молодые кланы поняли, что бить друг друга или просто стоять смотреть как ТОП клан фармит глупо, они так ничего не получат и парни начали делать ветер:
- Все не флаганые.
- Сначала забежал первый, прожали все АОЕ и умерли как герои выбив с ТОПов 30% маны.
-…
Продолжая пост выше.
В лаунчер уже залит патч с первым пакетом оптимизации стабильности. Не путать с оптимизацией FPS.
🟠Вес патча 0.45 гига.
🟠В преддверии Core мы сделали этот патч не обязательным для скачивания на данную минуту. По этому если не готовы сейчас выходить из игры и апдейтится перед эпиком, можете это не делать. Обновитесь потом.
В обновление вошли:
🟠Стабильность по вылетам и критам.
🟠Пакеты оптимизаци…
#Lu4
Новости оптимизации, стабильности, роста ФПС.
Для начала БАЗА! Пакеты оптимизации делятся на две сущности (на самом деле больше, но я упрощаю):
🟠Пакет обновлений стабильности клиента. Он в первую очередь работает с вылетами, критическими ошибками, провисаниями и прочими моментами, когда клиент ведет себя нестабильно.
🟠Пакет обновлений оптимизации. Этот пакет нацелен в первую очередь на рост FPS, плавность раб…
Сейчас будет тотальная крамола, после которой одна половина будет меня оскорблять, а вторая говорить, что я долбаеб и ничего не понимаю, ведь +1 час умноженные на 2 ВИТа в банан сете при недостаточной экономике коина решают. Но мне как-то похуй, я щас дам мнение игрока-КЛа.
Пол часа назад наблюдал, как на Carmine пацаны пиздятся за АК, и понял тотальную разницу в нас и в ЛАТАМ комьюнити:
🟠Они не дотягивают до нас по…
Как говорил Великий: ЕБАТЬ КАК СОЧНО! И я с ним согласен! :)
А еще и с охуенным FPS, в охуенной графике.
Кто вы, кто еще не тут и скипает ТАКОЕ?
Почему вы выбираете заведомо худшее?
Дали же выбор, дали возможность, пользуйся. Не ограничивай себя, ебаш в будущем, а не дрочи в прошлое (да-да, макросы, чатики и все такое скоро будут тоже 🤣).
Хватит уже гнить в 2 ФПС. Доколе, блять!?
p.s. Кстати там AQ щас будет! 😏
p.…
#Lu4
Прошел почти месяц со старта новых серверов и: "мы начинаем потихоньку выходить на пики (не те, что точеные) онлайна" - сказал бы я, будь это Сезон.
Но мы на Луче и тут все работает более правильно, так, как должно работать в хорошем MMORPG.
Гамме вон скоро полтора года исполнится, а там онлайн в несколько раза выше чем на момент открытия.
Вчера мы уже вышли на цифры:
🟠Gamma: 7064
🟠Black: 9008
🟠White: 6620
🟠Ca…
Все изменения уже залиты в Лаунчер, жмем проверку файлов.
❤12👍9❤🔥8👏2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @SaferoStreamInfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@SaferoStreamInfo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,634 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SaferoStreamInfo” (@SaferoStreamInfo), 10,146 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaferoStreamInfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.