Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗆𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖻𝗈𝗒. | 𝖲𝖺𝗆.𝖠.𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺.

Channel

𝗆𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖻𝗈𝗒. | 𝖲𝖺𝗆.𝖠.𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺.

@SamAlexNova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004372584794
TypeChannel
Username@SamAlexNova
Created5 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SamAlexNova

Growth

213226.58 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29 subscribers9 September 2026 — 32 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:4032+3
31 Aug 2026, 00:5529+2
24 Aug 2026, 14:0427+3
17 Aug 2026, 11:2824+3
11 Aug 2026, 14:1621no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:3021first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52742124907989914782136.2%
custom 54113012111628427831627.6%
custom 52740746910682678421119.0%
custom 53864863675953010451017.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC15 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⚫️oading.. 🎤 😈😯👋🫁 😀😀😀😀😀 Ответ на голосовое сообщение от контакта "паучок". ЧЕГО? ТЫ СЕЙЧАС СЕРЬЁЗНО?? нет ну во первых! В СМЫСЛЕ "вселенная издевается", чувачок, ты должен молиться на мой шлем! Технологии "чёрных Нова" – это пожалуй ЕДИНСТВЕННОЕ, что смогло поймать твой сигнал через ээ..как оно там, точно! МЕЖПРОСТРАНСТВЕННЫЙ БАРЬЕР. Так что вообще-то я твой спасательный круг в этой ситуации, паучок! Мог бы хоть

custom 52742124907989914783custom 54113012111628427832custom 52740746910682678421custom 53864863675953010451

8 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC24 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⚫️oading.. 🎤 😈😯👋🫁 😀😀😀😀😀 🙈апись идет или нет? О! Идёт наконец то. Йоу, паучок! Эт я. В общем, я тут летал два дня вокруг Юпитера. И знаешь че? В космосе капец как скучно, ну не в плане что он мне не нравится, просто зависать тут не с кем. Тут никто шуток не понимает, вчера встретил пару читаури – полные зануды. И тут я вспомнил твои тупые шуточки.. В смысле! НЕТ, НЕ ТО ЧТОБЫ я по ним соскучился, это понятное дело! О

custom 52740746910682678424custom 52742124907989914784custom 54113012111628427834

7 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC26 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😍🙈😍😎😍🥹. «Начало всего.» Всю мою жизнь отец твердил мне, что он не просто уборщик. Он часто рассказывал истории о том что был в рядах Корпуса Новы, тем кто защищал галактику. Рассказывал про пришельцев, космические корабли, шлемы, космос. И я, как тупой школьник думая что он рассказывает это из головы, придумывает. Я стыдился его. Думал что он просто травит байки чтоб сбежать от реальности. А потом, он исчез. Я так п

custom 52742124907989914784custom 54113012111628427834custom 53864863675953010453

7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC28 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⚫️oading.. 🎤 😈😯👋🫁 😀😀😀😀😀 😍ак запись идет? О, идет, а то печатать неудобно. Йоу, у меня тут чуть чуть связь пропадает, а вообще я на патруле в космосе, ну тут возле земли, вы поняли. Может фотки покажу, но все равно космос надо хоть раз увидеть наяву. Ну я полетел короче! До связи, если у меня будут силы. ( Конечно будут ) 😀😀😀 🌟онец голосового.✨

custom 52742124907989914783custom 52740746910682678422custom 53864863675953010452

5 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC34 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩he data is missing or has not yet been loaded and reported to you. 🔇 🤩🤩🤩 😍лава 1. 🤩oading...⏳

custom 52742124907989914783custom 54113012111628427833custom 53864863675953010452custom 52740746910682678421

5 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC31 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#SamNova 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🪽 Я должен поблагодарить тебя Титус, иногда я забываю, на что способен и кем мне суждено было стать. И чтобы нам обоим было предельно ясно: ты никогда не заберёшь у меня этот шлем.

custom 52742124907989914782custom 54113012111628427832custom 52740746910682678421custom 53864863675953010451

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SamAlexNova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗆𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖻𝗈𝗒. | 𝖲𝖺𝗆.𝖠.𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺.” (@SamAlexNova), 32 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SamAlexNova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.