!СПОЙЛЕР! не тангю но зато чудесная женщина❤️
custom 52742561920912090066custom 52740864206239333974

Channel
@Sambucar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002282701665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sambucar |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sambucar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 90 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 89 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 88 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 93 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 93 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
273 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5224247611531227452 | 80 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5274256192091209006 | 64 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5274086420623933397 | 45 | 16.5% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5188687318134851507 | 27 | 9.89% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 2.93% | |
| custom 5275985242845364007 | 6 | 2.20% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.733% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.366% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sambucar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
!СПОЙЛЕР! не тангю но зато чудесная женщина❤️
custom 52742561920912090066custom 52740864206239333974
Сегодня после работы порисую чтобы тгк не пустовал ✌
custom 52742561920912090066custom 52740864206239333972
+телефон +Тангю Художница которая отправила мне это, вообще топчик люблю ее всей душой
custom 522424761153122745211custom 52740864206239333975custom 51886873181348515073
новость дня. я утопила телефон на работе💐 завтра придеться ехать востонавливать номер
custom 527408642062393339710custom 52742561920912090063custom 52759852428453640073
Постараюсь вам сегодня что-то отрисовать или закончить один из колабов ❤️
custom 527425619209120900611
Вы не представляете как мне нравится Гён Су сталкер, это буквально лучшее что я видела в фд игры в кальмара за последнее время
custom 518868731813485150711custom 52242476115312274521
Гён Су тоже заслуживает внимания в моем тгк
custom 52742561920912090068custom 52242476115312274524
Кину вам спойлер на колаб 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Чтооо это не тангю боже фу позор
custom 522424761153122745211custom 51886873181348515074custom 52740864206239333974
Эволюция Гю в моем стиле ❤️
custom 527425619209120900610custom 51886873181348515075custom 52242476115312274524
Короче скоро будет последняя колаба а дальше я буду рисовать кое что оч оч крутое
custom 52242476115312274528custom 51886873181348515071custom 52759852428453640071
Ебать оч неожиданная колаба с @mangosushi67 или же по обычному Ешка 🦋 🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 (Фулл конечно же в комментариях)
custom 522424761153122745221custom 52742561920912090068custom 52740864206239333975
Мне оч зашло новое обновление так что решила оформить пост так
custom 52242476115312274528
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Sambucar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sambuca 18+” (@Sambucar), 90 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sambucar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.