Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sᴀɴᴅ Dʀᴇᴀᴍ

Channel

Sᴀɴᴅ Dʀᴇᴀᴍ

@SandDream

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,390subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584059763
TypeChannel
Username@SandDream
Description𝘋𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴 𝘓𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘥
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 October 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SandDream

Growth

1,3905 Oct 2026, 19:47 — 1,390 subscribers5 Oct 2026, 20:22 — 1,390 subscribers5 Oct 2026, 19:475 Oct 2026, 20:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,389–1,391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 20:221,390no change
5 Oct 2026, 19:471,390first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 1,390 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held20 (4 October 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total2,797
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
224
Videos
493
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51524637486439474007661.8%
custom 54498807420142685912419.5%
custom 515250854944781195375.69%
custom 603494147054318879275.69%
custom 515226654951551874064.88%
custom 515254241096997357621.63%
custom 515231625946700301510.813%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SandDream. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 October 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

اینو دوسش داشتم

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

رو پینات استارز زدم بازم

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 5 October 2026

خیلی دوسش داشتم

custom 54498807420142685913custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

مرسی

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

خداست

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

خیلی خفنه حقیقتاااا

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026

وای

custom 54498807420142685912custom 51524637486439474001

5 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Forwarded from @yeenjiaPhoto

https://t.me/SandDream

custom 51522665495155187401

5 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC122 views15 reactionsread 5 October 2026

یه چلنج استارزی بزارم دوباره؟ اینبار دلم میخواد سرگرم کننده هم باشه ولی خب ایده ای ندارم

custom 515246374864394740013custom 51523162594670030151custom 51525085494478119531

5 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC175 views23 reactionsread 5 October 2026

نظرتون راجب تم جدید چنل چیه

custom 515246374864394740016custom 51522665495155187405custom 51525085494478119532

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SandDream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sᴀɴᴅ Dʀᴇᴀᴍ” (@SandDream), 1,390 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SandDream.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.