Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 梧桐树丶报告评价

Channel

梧桐树丶报告评价

@Sandlgenyu234

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

721subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003650118592
TypeChannel
Username@Sandlgenyu234
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sandlgenyu234

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

702721711.57 August 2026 — 705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 706 subscribers15 August 2026 — 710 subscribers28 August 2026 — 702 subscribers5 September 2026 — 705 subscribers13 September 2026 — 721 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 699–724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 06:17721+16
5 Sept 2026, 17:16705+3
28 Aug 2026, 23:43702-8
15 Aug 2026, 18:33710+4
8 Aug 2026, 09:37706+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:18705no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:02705first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 03:23 UTC343 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#欣宝宝 @Goudai116 7/12 代聊 第一眼给人的感觉是排骨身材带点高冷的颜值中高的少御,长相基本跟照片一样。聊天熟悉了后,会发现其实是个逗比喜剧人,态度非常好。妹子虽然抽烟,但是洗浴前会刷牙,陪浴也非常认真仔细,脱下衣服竟然有惊喜。虽然是排骨身材,但是各部位都很匀称,A+的胸都显得有些料了,喜欢排骨身材的绝对不能错过。洗浴完在床上,妹子的态度也是一如既往,大蟒蛇,蛇到天荒地老都可以,口技也比较好。女上可以一直动,换成传教士后,边干边🐍,🐍够了还可以看到她喘气吐舌头和咬手指的样子,不禁让牛牛再硬了一些。最后换成后入,虽然是排骨身材,但是后入抓着两个小馒头一直往前顶也是蛮舒服的。做的时间稍微久了点,但是绝对没有任何催钟或者说要求手打。 总结:妹妹态度好,人照如一,喜欢排骨身材和少御的,绝对不容错过,其他冲着颜值和态度也可以打卡体验。

❤1

22 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC318 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @QingnianwenzhaipyyPhoto

@Goudai116 #欣宝宝 狗代 人照9.5,一眼本人,身高感觉163左右,七十来斤极致的排骨身材,胸A➕的样子,肤色正常,会抽烟但事前会先刷牙漱口,只有轻微的烟味儿。 从进门就在感慨真的好瘦好瘦……脱了衣服后更是感慨,但胸上和屁股上有是有点肉的,不是那种纯粹的排骨,该有肉的地方还是有一些,用手比了一下就是巴掌腰(喜欢排骨的天菜),洗澡的时候会洗的特别的仔细,很贴心。 到床上后只能说没被口爆已经算成功了,口技很好很好,可以整根吞下也可以舌头打转转,时间很长,口了好一会儿才结束戴套。由于用的套比较干所以用了润滑油,能明显感觉到比较紧,主包这种尺寸都有明显的感觉。女上很有力量,可以自己动很久,也可以一直狠狠的🐍,反馈多为喘气,加大力度就会有轻哼,反馈很真实。换到后入的时候反馈更佳,且视觉效果更佳,细细的腰也有肉的屁股,直接从后面抱着狂暴鸿儒结束! 总结:颜值蛮不错的,身材非常排骨的同时,胸和屁股也有些肉,比较紧,姿势配合…

21 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC273 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dengdaizhengyixiaojiePhoto

#叮铛 @Goudai116 7/12 代聊 硬件:20岁 身高168的样子 妹子骨架偏大点并不胖正常体重吧, 🐻C比啾啾的大点但没啾啾的软,对比身材也是细枝挂硕果了。人照8分和穿着蓝色衣服那个视频最像,妆化的很精致颜值好看。但是现在是短发了刚好到下巴的位置,感觉这样更适合御姐风格。正常肤色,小腿有纹身。人工白虎,下面还挺白的,户型很小,水不多。 软件:妹妹本人偏内向话不多,但态度没问题正常话题都能接。小🐍但可以一直🐍,有陪洗,口技不错。昆感女上感觉一般但是传教和后入小🐮🐮觉得有点紧。女上挺会摇的但是体力不太行,换姿势和动作都很配合,反馈蛮真实的但不会说话。要抽烟,但会问能不能抽。 总结:妹子硬件各方面很顶但是软件一般追求情绪价值的就算了,属于颜值大🐻身材车,值得打卡。

17 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC299 viewsread 8 August 2026

【妹子花名】:#欣宝宝 【验证留名】:wolf king 【验证时间】:7.14 【所在位置】:观城 【修车水费】:12pp 【是否代聊】:代聊 【身高身材】: 160左右,极致身材 【妹子年龄】: 20 【湿度紧度】: 比较紧 【颜值相似】:9分像, 【凶器罩杯】:B以上C未满 【环境卫生】:挺干净 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:颜值满分,态度极好 【性价比】:价格是否符合整体体验感受 9分/ /满分10.0分 【推荐程度】:9分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:只能说各位狼友对欣宝宝的开发不足百分之三十。对于一个多次回锅的人来说。 欣宝宝适合女仆装,脖子上套个小铃铛。或者猫咪驯鹿套装。在窗台在椅子上在桌子上。欣宝宝都会满足你,最流连忘返的是,在椅子上女上,欣宝宝的身材颜值一览无余,随着她卖…

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Sandlgenyu234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“梧桐树丶报告评价” (@Sandlgenyu234), 721 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sandlgenyu234.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.