Channel
@Sara_Anahid
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,264subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001454786319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sara_Anahid |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sara_Anahid |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 1,264 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 1,266 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 1,269 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 1,267 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 1,270 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 1,271 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,274 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 1,271 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 1,261 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,262 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 1,261 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,263 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 1,262 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 1,262 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
390 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 279 | 71.5% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 19.5% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 5.64% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جوری که جی منو شناخته! شمام بپرسید: Based on our chats, generate a clean 3x3 picture showing how you see me as a color, a song, a weather, a season, a book, a scent, a place, a flower, and a food. 🌱 @Sara_Anahid
❤10
Signed سارا آناهید
نمیخواهم در این غم غرق بشوم. نمیخواهم تمام روز به این فکر کنم که ممکن است بابا همه چیز را فراموش کند. سعی میکنم رشتههای آخر نودلم را با چاپاستیک بگیرم. بغض دارم. نودل را میگذارم توی دهان و قورت میدهم. بغض میتواند حتی طعمِ تیزِ سویاسس را هم کمجان کند. با خودم قرار گذاشتهام که نیمساعتی در روز میتوانیم گریهی مفصلی بکنیم. اگر دلمان خواست هی بگوییم چرا من؟ چرا حالا؟ و چراهای دیگر. بههرحال آدم لازم دارد گاهی …
❤28
Signed سارا آناهید
به این بهانه یاد یه جملهای افتادم. توی جلسه با یکی از هلدینگهای نامدار، مدیر منابع انسانی با افتخار گفت ما یه فلسفهای داریم؛ اینکه افراد تا مرز بیلیاقتیشون میتونن در این شرکت بمونن! منظورش این بود امکان رشد هست ولی بوی ایگو اصلا اجازه نمیداد متوجه چیز دیگهای بشیم...
😁13❤3👍1
Signed سارا آناهید
خیلی از شرکتهای بزرگ، خاصه آنهایی که قدمت ۲۰ ۳۰ ساله دارند و بهمرور درِ مارکتینگ و تبلیغات را به روی خود باز کردهاند، عموماً خیال میکنند همه از خداشان است که با آنها همکاری کنند. برای همین چندان به راحتی یا خوشایند کارجو فکر نمیکنند. این شرکتها معمولاً تمام جلسات را حضوری برگزار میکنند. دربارهی موضوع جلسه، اطلاعاتی به تو نمیدهند. مثلاً ممکن است ازت بخواهند بروی شرکت، بعد لیست مدارک مورد نیاز را بهت بدهند …
👍13❤9
Signed سارا آناهید
و من او را چون شاخهای که زیر بهمن شکسته باشد دوست میداشتم _ بیژن الهی 🌱 @Sara_Anahid
❤10
Signed سارا آناهید
واکنشهای مختلفی دیدم که "چرا گریههای فردوسیپور را منتشر میکنید؟" "او آدمِ سیستم است." یا ماجرای هجدهم و نوزدهم را روبروی ماجرای فردوسی پور گذاشتند و چندین و چند واکنش شبیه به این. من هم گریههایش را منتشر کرده بودم و حدس هم میزدم که چنین واکنشهایی پشتش بیاید. اما فکر کردم میتواند بهانهای برای بیان ایدههای مهمتر باشد. از خودم میپرسم چرا بخشی از جامعه دیگر این پایگاه اجتماعی را دوست ندارد؟ و فردوسیپور اولین…
❤21👍10👎9
Signed سارا آناهید
چرا ممبرهای روسِ اونجوری رو ریختن توی کانالا؟ روزی چند نفر رو باید ریمو کنم؛ شما هم؟
👍28👎4
Signed سارا آناهید
تلاش مذبوحانه جهت رسیدن به سروتونین 🌱 @Sara_Anahid
❤3
Signed سارا آناهید
اینترنت ثابت ایرانسل، یکی از افتضاحترینهاست؛ سرعت آپلودِ پایین؛ که یعنی جلسات گوگل میت رو پشتیبانی نمیکنه و نوسان شدید؛ که یعنی مدام قطع میشه و شما حتی حین تماشای فیلیمو هم مدام پرت میشی بیرون زیبا نیست برای اعصابِ پرتوان جوانِ ایرانی؟
👍19😁7❤1
Signed سارا آناهید
راویِ رمان زمینِ سوخته، وقتی شایعهها واقعی میشوند و میفهمد عراق راستی راستی به اهواز حمله کرده، میگوید: «خدا به خوزستان رحم کند...» و من اینجای داستان گریه کردم. 🌱 @Sara_Anahid نغمالعربی
❤16
Signed سارا آناهید
خوابش رو دیدم. انگار چیز نادرستی دربارهش گفته بودم و بعد از مدتها که میدیدمش، متوجه شدم اشتباه میکردهم. گمونم ازش پرسیدم منظورت این نبوده؟ که گفت نه. شاید هم نپرسیدم و ادراکش کردم. فقط میدونستم نباید اینطوری دربارهش حرف میزدم. چهطوری؟ یادم نیست. خواب عجیبی بود. بیشترین چیزی که ازش به بیداری رسید، مهرش بود. و انگار رسالتی بر من بود که اسمش رو تمیز کنم... سفیدش کنم... من وقتهای زیادی این بار رو روی شونهم حس…
❤19
Signed سارا آناهید
گاه آنکه ما را به حقیقت میرساند، خود از آن عاریست _ مارگوت بیگل 🌱 @Sara_Anahid
❤8👍1
Signed سارا آناهید
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sara_Anahid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“برای خاطر حُسنیوسفها” (@Sara_Anahid), 1,264 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sara_Anahid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.