Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сергей Белановский

Channel

Сергей Белановский

@Sbelan_52

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,840subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001543289656
TypeChannel
Username@Sbelan_52
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sbelan_52

Growth

3,8403,8943,8677 August 2026 — 3,894 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,894 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,890 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,891 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,880 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,873 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,862 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,860 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,851 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,847 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,840 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,832–3,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:003,840-7
2 Sept 2026, 13:353,847-4
30 Aug 2026, 21:283,851-9
27 Aug 2026, 13:133,860-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:483,862-11
20 Aug 2026, 22:583,873-7
17 Aug 2026, 20:583,880-11
14 Aug 2026, 17:073,891+1
11 Aug 2026, 06:523,890-4
8 Aug 2026, 10:133,894no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:183,894first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,722 reactions across 20 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍46527.0%
25714.9%
😢1689.76%
💯1518.77%
🔥1508.71%
🤣1146.62%
🤔834.82%
😭764.41%
👎301.74%
🕊281.63%
😁281.63%
💊261.51%
👏231.34%
👻150.871%
🦄140.813%
🤬130.755%
🤮130.755%
😱110.639%
💩80.465%
🎉70.407%
14 further kinds422.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,722 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,490 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

При решении вопроса о территориях нужно сначала ответить на фундаментальный вопрос: мнение населения этих территорий играет какую-то роль или нет?

💯44👍26🔥3😢3🤡2😁1😐1

1 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,730 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О российской гуманитарной псевдонауке, выпуск 1. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_90503040_39116189.pdf

👍275🔥5🤣3🎉2💩1🤡1

16 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC≈3,160 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хикикомори и демократический процесс У Токвиля есть место о том, что весь мир охвачен демократическим процессом, причем неодолимая сила этого процесса наводит на мысль о Божественном Провидении. Сейчас весь мир охвачен процессом хикикомори. Не знаю, как насчет Божественного Провидения, но процесс обладает такой же неодолимой силой. Более того, я думаю, что это один и тот же процесс. И ему еще далеко до кульминации.

🤔12😢11😱7👍5🔥21

15 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC≈2,880 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Хикикомори - интервью с ИИ

😁4🤣1

9 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈4,020 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если удастся наладить стабильные поставки бензина по 100 руб. за литр, будет инерционный сценарий. Если нет - перелом трендов. Прошу комментировать только специалистов.

👍27🤣13😱3

3 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈5,180 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моральная дилемма Есть государства А и Б. Государство А нанесло ракетный удар по жилым кварталам городов государства Б. Погибло много гражданских, включая детей. У государства Б сеть техническая возможность нанести ответный удар, в котором тоже погибнет много гражданских, включая детей. Красная кнопка перед вами. Нажмете или нет?

😭32😢15👎9🤔9👍2💯21

2 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC≈4,510 views109 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О Набиуллиной У моего предложения есть одно важное и преимущество. Нормализация предполагает, что власть должна будет как-то решать огромное количество конкретных вопросов. У меня спрашивают, как я собираюсь их решать. Отвечаю: вот я назначил Набиуллину президентом, пусть она и решает. И это опять же не шутка. У меня впечатление, что она - единственный человек, способный занять принципиальную позицию и обладающий п

👍51👏1813💊12🐳3💩3🤣3👀2

1 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC≈3,700 views201 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мои предложения по нормализации (не шутка) 1. Путин заканчивает СВО. 2. ПОСЛЕ окончания СВО объявляет чрезвычайно положение (ЧП), которое будет действовать 6 лет. 3. В рамках ЧП распускает все выборные органы, запрещает все политические партии, распускает Конституционный суд - все это сроком на 3 года. 4. Запрещает чиновникам все уровней увольняться без разрешения или исчезать, рассматривая это как дезертирство.

🤣85🔥44👍23👻15💊14🦄6😁54

15 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈4,760 views104 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Победа Ирана обнуляет шансы на нормализацию в России. В дополнение к лозунгу "сделаем, как в Китае" добавляется "сделаем, как в Иране" и "сделаем, как в КНДР".

😢55💯18👍11😁6👎4🤔3😭3🔥2

24 May 2026, 05:30 UTC≈34,200 views198 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очередная лысенковщина На наших глазах происходит идеологический разгром научной школы Института философии по тем же алгоритмам, по которым в прошлом были разгромлены генетика в 1948, кибернетика в 1950 и социология в 1972 годах. Десятки других подобных случаев история не сохранила. Во всех названных случаях инициатором разгрома была не власть, а группы идеологических лоббистов, которые объявляли ненаучными соответст

👍68💯57😭41🤬139👎6💔2👏1

7 May 2026, 07:14 UTC≈6,620 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот настоящая социология https://charodeyy.livejournal.com/734384.html?mode=reply#add_comment

😢18👍146👏2🔥2👎1

25 Apr 2026, 14:23 UTC≈7,440 views119 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Какое-то время назад я писал пост про Веру и Гришу, который дезертировал с СВО. Ушел в 2023 г. нормальным, работящим мужиком из тех, кото сейчас очень не хватает. Вернулся конченым наркоманом, терроризировал жену и детей. В минуты просветления плакал и просил устроить его в наркологию. Веру довел до того, что она сама хотела отправить его на фронт. Но, по последним данным, пошел сам, его вроде бы простили. И вот сего

😢64🕊28🤮9👍5🤔42💩2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sbelan_52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Белановский” (@Sbelan_52), 3,840 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sbelan_52.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.