15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,241–16,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 21:16
16,247
-9
21 Aug 2026, 07:35
16,256
+1
20 Aug 2026, 09:57
16,255
+2
18 Aug 2026, 10:43
16,253
-2
17 Aug 2026, 13:47
16,255
-4
16 Aug 2026, 07:39
16,259
-7
14 Aug 2026, 21:46
16,266
+3
13 Aug 2026, 10:14
16,263
-3
12 Aug 2026, 08:02
16,266
-5
11 Aug 2026, 10:38
16,271
-4
10 Aug 2026, 08:21
16,275
+3
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
16,272
-8
8 Aug 2026, 10:15
16,280
-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:50
16,285
-3
6 Aug 2026, 23:17
16,288
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 16,247 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.838%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
30 (22 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
166,440
Reactions total
1,395
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,970
Videos
≈46
Links
≈1,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,454 reactions across 30 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
514
35.4%
❤
235
16.2%
👍
165
11.3%
😢
153
10.5%
💩
65
4.47%
🤣
62
4.26%
🤡
57
3.92%
🔥
33
2.27%
😭
31
2.13%
🤯
26
1.79%
💯
19
1.31%
😍
12
0.825%
👎
10
0.688%
🤮
8
0.55%
🥴
8
0.55%
😱
7
0.481%
🤪
7
0.481%
🥰
7
0.481%
🐳
6
0.413%
👏
6
0.413%
11 further kinds
23
1.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 30 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ScR00GeChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Возможно, есть желающие продавать свои активы, рекомендую вместо этого воспользоваться Rysk.
Рынок жадный, можно получить хорошую премию на опционах.
Есть конечно риск, что в моменте цена будет выше страйка, а к моменту экспирации опциона упадёт, но для меня такой вариант намного комфортнее, чем продажа через лимитные ордера на бирже. Я в любом случае готов холдить ETH ниже 2500$.
Пост про опционы
P.S. Я провёл "…
Решил закрыть позу $MSTR на byreal и отправил в стакан.
Не нравится мне, что Сейлор льёт битки ниже своей средней+постоянные допки акций.
Лучше просто буду держать BTC, меньше рисков.
Крипта по чуть-чуть растёт, а вот на рынке CS2 всё очень плохо.
Скоро перелой, чуть-чуть трейжу, профит копейки, рынок полудохлый.
Наверное в сентябре будет финальная серия "100,000$ на трейде в CS2"
Сейчас норм фандинг на монетах BTW и ESPORTS.
Капает примерно 0.2%-0.5% в сутки, на ESPORTS фармлю уже несколько месяцев, когда фандинг падает, то просто выхожу из позиции и через время перезахожу.
Если будете заходить, то осторожно, это опасные щитки, ESPORTS уже несколько раз пампили в иксы, надо всё время следить.
У BTW рыночная капа $1.9B, FDV $7B. За сутки уже нарисовали х2, могут нарисовать ещё несколько икс…
В продолжение к посту про Тай.
Почти всё оплачивал картой Tria.
Уже больше полугода юзаю её как основную карту.
Раньше у премиум карты был безлимитный кешбек 6%, сейчас 6% кешбек только на первые 4к$ в месяц, дальше кешбек 1%. Всё равно лучше чем у конкурентов.
Ещё и насыпают поинтов за траты, мб дадут аирдропчик на кофе со сникерсом.
Так же юзаю карты Pionex, Plasma One и Bybit, но основная именно Tria.
Пхукет
Последние 14 дней отдыхал в солнечном Тайланде с друзьями.
Думаю многим будет интересно сколько стоит такой отдых в 2026 году, напоминаю, это цифры, чтобы БЮДЖЕТНО отдохнуть…
Билеты в/из Тайланд(а) - 3446.22$
Отель - 1428.47$
Пожрать/рестораны/кафе/супермаркеты - 900$
Развлечения/Катамаран/Картинг/Слоны/Пинг-Понг шоу/Кабаре/Тайский бокс - 1620$
Такси - 332$
Шоппинг - 1197$
Массаж - 250$
Итог: ± 9173.69$
…
👍49😁38❤27🔥4🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @ScR00GeChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 71,753 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTON | Крипта, ИИ, Финансы @crypton_off · 61,418 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
TrueDad - Steam / Криптовалюта / Инвестиции @truedadEducation · 55,286 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Павел Сычёв | $ TradeParty $ @tradeparty1337 · 57,032 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Bybit Alpha @Official_Bybit_Alpha · 228,178 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ScRooGe” (@ScR00GeChannel), 16,247 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScR00GeChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
