29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,542–18,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 06:38
18,582
-15
6 Sept 2026, 21:17
18,597
-24
4 Sept 2026, 09:58
18,621
-12
2 Sept 2026, 19:17
18,633
-7
1 Sept 2026, 19:55
18,640
-4
31 Aug 2026, 21:55
18,644
-14
30 Aug 2026, 02:33
18,658
-10
29 Aug 2026, 03:34
18,668
-8
28 Aug 2026, 01:47
18,676
-8
27 Aug 2026, 03:43
18,684
-8
26 Aug 2026, 01:34
18,692
-6
25 Aug 2026, 01:48
18,698
-14
23 Aug 2026, 13:17
18,712
-6
22 Aug 2026, 01:45
18,718
-14
20 Aug 2026, 17:04
18,732
-16
19 Aug 2026, 18:06
18,748
-5
18 Aug 2026, 18:08
18,753
-8
17 Aug 2026, 17:26
18,761
-12
16 Aug 2026, 14:07
18,773
-11
14 Aug 2026, 21:48
18,784
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 18,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,340
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
35 (2 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
23,400
Reactions total
534
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 27s
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,190 reactions across 35 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
475
21.7%
👍
461
21.1%
🔥
314
14.3%
❤
233
10.6%
👏
157
7.17%
🙏
113
5.16%
🤣
100
4.57%
❤🔥
93
4.25%
🤬
86
3.93%
🤪
47
2.15%
🤔
44
2.01%
🤷♂
27
1.23%
🤯
21
0.959%
👎
6
0.274%
😁
4
0.183%
🥰
4
0.183%
😡
2
0.091%
😱
2
0.091%
🐳
1
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️Election Fraud Proof Letter sent to President Donald J. Trump and Team on August 17th.
‼️STILL NO RESPONSE!
It's time for the People to put the pressure on. Why is this evidence being ignored?
If you seriously want our elections fixed you must promote this campaign and Call and email the following:
The White House
Phone: (202) 456-1111 (comments line)
Switchboard: (202) 456-1414
Email: [email protected]…
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’):
Q Drop 3906 may be the most important.
It says "Decide..."
It is up to you. Or you can continue to have people misinterpret Q for you, eat your popcorn, sit on the couch with your froggy mask on and wait.
We The People are the Plan!
We can't control everything that happens to us.
But there's one thing we are 100% in control of.
Learning how to shift it can change everything.
Watch this!
🔥LIVE TODAY: THE ELECTIONS - SHASTA COUNTY, CLINT CURTIS
& THE FBI
What happens when a computer programmer says he was asked to create software capable of secretly flipping votes-and later takes his story to Congress and the FBI?
Clint Curtis joins Lewis Herms for an exclusive interview examining his firsthand account, his years-long fight for election integrity, and how his story connects to the battle over electio…
08/17/26 is a Big Day
I sent a three page letter with evidence of stolen elections to President Trump and many others today certified and track-able mail.
I will post the full letter on all my channels in the coming days, after all involved have a chance to respond. We The People will not continue to rollover and accept stolen elections.
This is the time for us to put the pressure on. This may be our last stand!
Why would this propaganda video be introduced 25 years later?
Because the false narrative is collapsing and the baddies are trying to prop it back up. People are awakening!
Check out this powerful conversation with Mark Z., Fernando from the ATB and Lewis Herms
https://rumble.com/v7e5g6c-anti-trafficking-bureau-rescuing-children-restoring-lives-and-building-hope.html
Lewis Herms sits down with Pastor Dave Bryan of Church of Glad Tidings for an important conversation about the upcoming REV17 2.0 Conference — “Rising Up for the Children.”
REV17 2.0 brings together pastors, investigators, journalists, advocates, survivors and leaders for three days dedicated to exposing the reality of child trafficking, equipping people to take action, and standing together for children who cannot …
The tide is changing and the truth is everywhere; including the NFL. Here’s the link to watch the full interview. https://rumble.com/v7e4ece-lewis-herms-discusses-nfl-players-lying-about-vaccination-to-the-public-wit.html
My first show live on my channel starting soon with Michael Jaco. We will cover Islam v Israel and the craziness MANIC NEWS. Wow, it will be good!
https://rumble.com/v7dzwxi-lewis-and-michael-jaco-break-down-the-matrix-exposing-the-truth.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @ScrewBigGov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ScrewBigGov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ScrewBigGov named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@wowlewi named in 10 posts, 13 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@immutablechrist named in 4 posts, 13 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jason Shurka @jasonyosefshurka · 31,340 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
Nicholas Veniamin @NicholasVeniamin · 92,498 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 42,197 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Jonathan Otto - Health Secret @jonathanottohealth · 29,451 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ScrewBigGov.com - Lewis Herms (Next Governor of California)” (@ScrewBigGov), 18,582 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScrewBigGov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.