Channel
@Secondarynotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
598subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521653907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Secondarynotes |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Secondarynotes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 598 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 596 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 595 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 591 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 590 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 590 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
165 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 129 | 78.2% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 15.2% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 3.03% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من کتاب «تفکر سریع و کند» رو تا حالا...
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
- ایستگاه هفته هفتم - قبل از جمعبندی این هفته دو نکته کوچک بنویسم. ۱. اولی برای دوستانی که هفته قبل گفتن دوست داشتن کتاب رو شروع کنن ولی هنوز نشده. تعدادتون تقریبا بیشتر از همیشه بوده (۲۱ نفر). به ذهنم رسید چیزهایی بنویسم که شاید به دردتون بخوره. ولی گفتم قبلش ازتون بخوام که میشه در یک عبارت یا جمله کوتاه بنویسید که چرا نشده شروع کنید؟ منظورم یک جواب کامل یا تحلیلی نیست. هر چیز به ظاهر سادهای رو هم که در ذهن داری…
❤3
پهلوان پنبه اگه یه وقت دشمنی داشید و خواستید احتمال گرفتاری اون در سوگیری availability رو زیاد کنید، خواستید کاری کنید که سیستم ۲ تنبلتری پیدا کنه و قدرت تحلیلی ذهنش کمتر بشه، کافیه به یادش بندازید که در یک زمان، بسیار قدرتمند بوده. حتی اگه این یادآوری، صرفا القای این حس باشه، نه بازتابی از مقدار واقعی قدرت. پ.ن. عکس از صفحه آخر فصل the science of availability. توضیح اینکه نکته بالا یک حاشیه بر این فصله. یک نکته …
😁3✍2👍1
اپلیکیشن نفرینشده اینستاگرام رو دوست ندارم. هر روز بیشتر دوست ندارمش. حس میکنم ما نیاز داریم بیشتر و هوشمندانهتر از قبل پارو بزنیم. هر روز. ولی اینستاگرام رو که باز میکنم صدای ویولن میشنوم.
👍17❤5🐳1
انکرینگ ⚓ حدس میزنم با «اثر لنگر» آشنا باشید. از اون مفاهیمیه که چون معمولا برای آدمها حس شگفتی به همراه داره، جاهای مختلف خیلی تکرار میشه. اما اگه نمیدونید، یه مثال ساده داره. اینکه اگه برید از آدمها بپرسید: «گاندی وقتی فوت شد بیشتر از ۱۴۴ سال داشت یا کمتر؟»، برآوردشون از سن فوت گاندی بیشتر از حالتی میشه که این عدد رو نگفته باشید. البته اگر اولین بار هست این مفهوم رو میشنوید ممکنه حس کنید که روی شما تاثیر ند…
❤12✍2
وضعیت فعلی من با کتاب «تفکر سریع و کند»...
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
- ایستگاه هفته ششم - یک هفته دیگه هم سپری شد. بیاید قبل از ادامه، یک جمعبندی کوچک به روال هفتگیمون داشته باشیم:
❤3
رودخانهٔ سیستمی یه داستان هست برای توضیح اینکه داشتن نگاه سیستمی چطوریه. شاید شنیده باشید. من مشخصا اون رو از بچههایی که کتاب «بالا دست» نشر آریانا قلم رو معرفی میکردن به خاطر دارم. البته خودم این کتاب رو نخوندم. صرفا حس میکنم اینکه چند بار شنیدم و با اسم کتاب هم همخوانی داره، ممکنه داستان محوری کتاب باشه. اونم اینه که اگر در پایین یک رودخونه ایستادید و میبینید که مجبورید مدام آدمها رو از رودخونه نجات بدید که غ…
❤9🤔2✍1👍1
سوال سادهتر یه لحظه به سوال زیر فکر کنید: شرایط شما در ۵ سال بعد چطوره؟ البته شاید بگید چرا یه لحظه فکر کنم؟ چون فکر کردن به چنین سوالی ساده نیست. طبیعتا زمان زیادی لازم داره. چند ساعت. چند روز. شاید حتی بیشتر. اما اگه فکر کردن به این سوال زمانبر هست، اون جواب سریعی که یهو مثل پاپآپ روی صفحه ذهنمون ظاهر میشه چیه؟ همون جوابی که نمیتونیم بطور ارادی جلوی ظاهر شدنش رو بگیریم، و به هر حال به ذهنمون میرسه. حتما …
❤10
من کتاب تفکر سریع و کند رو تا حالا...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
- ایستگاه هفته پنجم - یک هفته دیگه هم جلو رفتیم. اما قبل از اینکه برنامه هفته قبل رو جمعبندی کنیم، یه نکته بگم. یک تشکر در واقع، از دوستانی که توی نظرسنجی هفته قبل گفته بودن که کتاب رو قبلا خوندن. این گزینه کاملا اتفاقی به ذهنم رسیده بود. ولی وقتی دیدم بچههایی هستن که کتاب رو خوندن و البته پیگیر همخوانی هستن و دنبال میکنن اون رو، کلی انرژی گرفتم. میخوام بگم که حضورتون، نعمته. باعث میشه من سعی کنم دقیقتر متوجه…
❤7
پرش از دشواریهای ابهام حتما شنیدید که میگن زود قضاوت نکن؟ ولی احتمالا یه مقدار زیادی هم شنیدید که کلا قضاوت نکن. نمیدونم این ایده سمی از کجا میاد. قضاوت درباره همهٔ اقدامات انجام شده توسط همهٔ بنیبشر، معلومه کار اشتباهیه. اشتباهه، نقض آزادیهای فردیه، فایدهای هم نداره. به من نوعی چرا باید مربوط باشه که فرد روبرویی که در پیادهرو دارم میبینم، چه جور آدمیه. داره به چی فکر میکنه. و خیلی چیزهای دیگه. اما اگه همون…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Secondarynotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
من کتاب «تفکر سریع و کند» رو تا حالا...
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وضعیت فعلی من با کتاب «تفکر سریع و کند»...
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
من کتاب تفکر سریع و کند رو تا حالا...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وضعیت من و کتاب «تفکر سریع و کند»: تا امروز...
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
لطفا فقط اگه کتاب تفکر سریع و کند رو دارید، صرفنظر از اینکه الان در حال خواندن هستید یا نه، به این سوال جواب بدید: شما کدام ترجمه فارسی از کتاب رو دارید؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گاهنوشتهها” (@Secondarynotes), 598 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secondarynotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.