Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Seekr Trending

Channel

Seekr Trending

@SeekrTrending

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,864subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002152633628
TypeChannel
Username@SeekrTrending
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeekrTrending

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,8649,9579,910.57 August 2026 — 9,957 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,957 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,951 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,923 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,915 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,897 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,920 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,918 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,915 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,892 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,868 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,864 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,850–9,971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:409,864-4
12 Sept 2026, 22:599,868-24
9 Sept 2026, 03:169,892-23
3 Sept 2026, 13:199,915-3
30 Aug 2026, 21:289,918-2
28 Aug 2026, 08:039,920+23
24 Aug 2026, 22:059,897-18
17 Aug 2026, 23:329,915-8
14 Aug 2026, 21:189,923-16
11 Aug 2026, 19:429,939-12
8 Aug 2026, 11:319,951-6
7 Aug 2026, 13:169,957no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:099,957first reading

Engagement

696 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.522%
avg views ÷ 9,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.5
140 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
140
of 696 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held696 (7 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total7,204
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC12 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for Barron 🦉 Market Cap: $91,282.00 Increase: 59.19%

29 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC28 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for Larpcoin 🦉 Market Cap: $90,560.00 Increase: 3.02x

29 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC30 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for Larpcoin 🦉 Market Cap: $61,731.00 Increase: 2.06x

29 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC31 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for Larpcoin 🦉 Market Cap: $58,776.00 Increase: 96.27%

29 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC33 viewsread 29 August 2026

TRUMP2 is now on Seekr Trending CA: 3anxpdxLgwEKTwJvNW4aYFgpgPdS2sD8XZn3yyQwpump Market Cap: $27,007.94 Dexscreener Paid: ❌ CTO: ❌ West Tweeted Today has been a full day of larps and trump coins. Why don't we run "Official Trump 2.0", I'll bot holders so we can easily psyop. I devved Official Elon Musk & it went to 2m. I think this could start a meta. Notable Holders 🎯 KOL: 1 💡 Use GMGN to snipe on Telegra

29 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC31 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for Larpcoin 🦉 Market Cap: $46,445.00 Increase: 55.1%

29 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC37 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Barron is now on Seekr Trending CA: 5Lm6yjvckqjgpHDfAsTuRLLvc4mH4jDF7ihc6E3xpump Market Cap: $57,340.87 Dexscreener Paid: ❌ CTO: ✅ Website thedevrrrrrr Tweeted just gave us all a meme for this. we are all retards for bidding it, investors... 💡 Use GMGN to snipe on Telegram 👁️: 181

29 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC29 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Larpcoin is now on Seekr Trending CA: BXQ2nUKvpr6S2e1SnNYtpKRhbCHdwryVn3ipdWCCpump Market Cap: $29,945.95 Dexscreener Paid: ❌ CTO: ✅ Tooly Tweeted They just rugged a fake trump coin, apparently every coin is fake today, at this point larpcoin is the next fartcoin 😭 Notable Holders 🎯 KOL: 2 💡 Use GMGN to snipe on Telegram 👁️: 212

29 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC40 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

standby is now on Seekr Trending CA: 8JMpXsFzZW1RvKckdRKX2krgUqaR11nT7AN1SgLCinQe Market Cap: $33,890.27 Dexscreener Paid: ❌ CTO: ✅ realtrumpcoins Tweeted We are addressing the current situation now. Please standby investors. 💡 Use GMGN to snipe on Telegram 👁️: 128

29 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC37 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for GOLDNIGGA 🦉 Market Cap: $346,134.00 Increase: 6.51x

29 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC34 viewsread 29 August 2026

Update for GOLDNIGGA 🦉 Market Cap: $290,985.00 Increase: 5.47x

Showing the 12 most recent of 696 posts we hold for @SeekrTrending. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seekr Trending” (@SeekrTrending), 9,864 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeekrTrending.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.