Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sees.Fun

Channel

Sees.Fun

@SeesFunOfficial

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159,083subscribers

-3,978 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002362750007
TypeChannel
Username@SeesFunOfficial
DescriptionSees.Fun—Telegram’s first prediction voting game. Play: @SeesFunBot Channel: @SeesFunOfficial X: https://x.com/SeesFun Ads: @MemesGlo
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeesFunOfficial

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

159,083163,061161,0727 August 2026 — 163,061 subscribers7 August 2026 — 163,061 subscribers8 August 2026 — 162,730 subscribers9 August 2026 — 162,376 subscribers10 August 2026 — 162,099 subscribers11 August 2026 — 161,831 subscribers12 August 2026 — 161,499 subscribers14 August 2026 — 161,231 subscribers15 August 2026 — 160,762 subscribers16 August 2026 — 160,512 subscribers17 August 2026 — 160,086 subscribers18 August 2026 — 159,903 subscribers19 August 2026 — 159,647 subscribers20 August 2026 — 159,525 subscribers22 August 2026 — 159,083 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3,978. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158,486–163,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 10:06159,083-442
20 Aug 2026, 20:56159,525-122
19 Aug 2026, 20:18159,647-256
18 Aug 2026, 22:57159,903-183
17 Aug 2026, 23:07160,086-426
16 Aug 2026, 21:48160,512-250
15 Aug 2026, 15:52160,762-469
14 Aug 2026, 01:18161,231-268
12 Aug 2026, 18:26161,499-332
11 Aug 2026, 18:13161,831-268
10 Aug 2026, 19:21162,099-277
9 Aug 2026, 18:41162,376-354
8 Aug 2026, 15:07162,730-331
7 Aug 2026, 13:00163,061no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:49163,061first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.898%
avg views ÷ 159,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.875%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held21 (5 February 202613 August 2026)
Views total2,858
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
113
Links
112

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12937.8%
7822.9%
🔥5115.0%
👏3610.6%
🤔144.11%
😁92.64%
72.05%
🥰41.17%
🆒30.88%
🐳20.587%
👻20.587%
💯20.587%
😎20.587%
10.293%
🏆10.293%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC978 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🏛💥 Nolan’s Biggest Hit Yet Nolan’s The Odyssey has already sailed past $1.1B worldwide.With domestic sales still climbing, can it push even further? ⚔️ Voting Topic: Will the total domestic gross for The Odyssey be at least $570M by August 31? 🎖️ Another Box Office Milestone?Make your call on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

6👍4

3 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,880 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🤩🎬 How Far Will Spidey Swing? Spider-Man: Brand New Day is already crushing the box office. The only question now: where will it land? 🍿 🕷 Voting Topic: Will the total domestic gross for Spider-Man: Brand New Day be between 800m and 900m by August 31? 💰 Hit the sweet spot—predict now on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍65🔥4

21 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,660 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🌍🔥 Hottest July Ever? Heatwaves are sweeping across parts of Europe, and forecasters say July 2026 could rank among the hottest months on record. 🌡 Voting Topic: Will July 2026 be the hottest month on record? ☀️ Record-breaking heat or not quite? Make your call on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍75🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC≈3,530 views17 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📷🏆 Who's Joining the Champions' Photo? Trump could stay on stage for the World Cup trophy ceremony, with fans debating whether he'll end up in the champions' photo. 🌍 Voting Topic: Will Trump be in the World Cup Champions Photo? Predict now on Sees. 🥅 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

6👍6🔥3😁2

2 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC≈3,530 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🏆💥 Haaland vs. Brazil. Who Wins? Norway vs. Brazil is drawing massive attention.Norway have Haaland. Brazil have history. 🆗 Voting Topic: Will Norway beat Brazil? 👀 Believe in the upset? Vote now on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

12🔥5👍3

23 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC≈24,700 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸💲Inflation: Heating Up Again? U.S. inflation remains a key market focus as policymakers, consumers, and investors watch for signs of where prices are headed next. 📈 Voting Topic: Will U.S. annual inflation be 3.8% in June? One monthly reading could shift expectations fast. 👀Vote! 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍11🥰3🔥2

17 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC≈6,310 views17 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

⚽️🆚 Too Close to Call? Ghana vs Panama Group L kicks off as Ghana national football team and Panama national football team battle for crucial World Cup points. 👀 🦶 Voting Topic: Will Ghana vs Panama end in a draw? 📍 Deadlock or late winner?Make your call on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

7👍3👏3💯2🏆1🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC≈3,350 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

👽📡 Got an Alien Message? Don’t Reply. The IAA just released new alien-contact guidelines—don't message ET back on your own,and igniting a wave of online discussion.👀 🔫Voting Topic: Will the U.S. confirm that aliens exist by September 30? 🛸 Historic disclosure or still classified?Vote! 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍7😁5👻2

26 May 2026, 07:14 UTC≈20,800 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

❤️💰 MicroStrategy Loading Up Again? MicroStrategy has made Bitcoin buys a regular headline—and traders are watching closely for the next move. 👀 ⭐️ Voting Topic: Will Microstrategy announce a Bitcoin purchase May 26-June 1? Buy signal or quiet week?Vote now on Sees. 🗳 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍104🔥4👏2

14 May 2026, 04:04 UTC≈13,300 views18 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔴🤨 “A Big, Fat Hug” — Really? Trump says Xi will give him “a big, fat hug” at their summit. With global tensions high, will the cameras catch a surprise embrace? 🫂 Voting Topic: Will Trump and Xi hug at their summit? 🤝 Hug or no hug?Call it on Sees. 🚀 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👏6👍4🤔4🔥31

11 May 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,940 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

⚽️🔥 France: Fans’ Pick for 2026? A recent Bank of America survey shows France national football team as the fan favorite for the 2026 World Cup—can they finish the job? 🏆 Voting Topic: Will France win the 2026 FIFA World Cup Winner? 🗳 Glory again or heartbreak?Call it on Sees. 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍3🔥1😁1

30 Apr 2026, 10:11 UTC≈13,000 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🔴 Powell Exit Drama: Countdown to May 15 Jerome Powell signaled he plans to stay on the Fed board afterward, adding a twist to the transition. 👀 Voting Topic: Jerome Powell out as Fed Chair by May 15, 2026? ⚖️ Smooth handover or last-minute drama?Vote! 📱Twitter | 📱Channel | 📱Youtube

👍9🔥6👏51

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @SeesFunOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,237 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sees.Fun” (@SeesFunOfficial), 159,083 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeesFunOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.