Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
93.4 average views per post against 204,733 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.046%. Across the 7,218 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,005–316,161 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.84% and 13.1%, with a median of 5.46%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (7 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Posts measured
440 of 440 published in the window (438 exact, 2 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
41,115
Mature posts only
0.114% over 100 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 6 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 27 days, net -2,199. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204,400–207,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 22:16
204,733
-239
4 Sept 2026, 09:56
204,972
-87
2 Sept 2026, 20:16
205,059
-120
1 Sept 2026, 19:45
205,179
-125
31 Aug 2026, 17:36
205,304
-108
30 Aug 2026, 19:15
205,412
-96
29 Aug 2026, 18:27
205,508
-57
28 Aug 2026, 20:39
205,565
-50
28 Aug 2026, 00:04
205,615
+30
26 Aug 2026, 23:19
205,585
-73
25 Aug 2026, 23:37
205,658
-65
24 Aug 2026, 22:14
205,723
-127
23 Aug 2026, 06:14
205,850
+34
21 Aug 2026, 14:58
205,816
-95
20 Aug 2026, 16:22
205,911
-78
19 Aug 2026, 13:28
205,989
+23
18 Aug 2026, 14:35
205,966
-139
17 Aug 2026, 14:38
206,105
-222
16 Aug 2026, 04:37
206,327
-276
14 Aug 2026, 12:39
206,603
first reading
Engagement
440 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.046%
avg views ÷ 204,733 subscribers
Avg views / post
93.4
440 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
440
of 440 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 440 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
440 (8 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
41,115
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14
70.0%
🔥
3
15.0%
🎉
1
5.00%
👏
1
5.00%
🤔
1
5.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 440 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 440 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😂🤣🥲☺️😊🙂
😎 जैसा कि सभी को पता ही है LUCENT कोई भी एग्जाम हो सब के लिए ही जरूरी है ये नहीं पढ़े matlab आप की तैयारी अधूरी है इस लिए Lucent 2026 का paid Batch लाया गया है जिसमें आप को डेली Homework देके Live TEST के माध्यम से Book को 6 महीना में कंप्लीट करवाया जाएगा ....❤️
🚬स्पेशल फोकस आने वाले Exam 🏷
⭐ BPSC AEDO
⭐ BSSC CGL 4
⭐ BPSC TRE 4
⭐ दारोगा 2026-27 🆕🆕
⭐ 72 & 73 BPSC (PT) & Other Exam के लिए है जिनको बेसिक strong क…
💬💬💬💬💬💬
जिनको भी ऊपर दिए गए Speedy Book का क्विज बोट चाहिए का व ले सकते है सारे बुक का क्विज बोट ऑलरेडी अपलोड है.....❤️
➡️इसमें आप को monthly Current Affairs का अपडेट मिलेगा एक month से 200 Question milenge ....❤️
🔣Notes - January 2025 से December
2026 तक Update मिलेगा.. ✔️
PRICE - RS 49 /- Only
Scanner - यहां क्लिक करे..
Admin ID @Mrvikasthakur ☑️
☹️☹️☹️🤩😜🥳😖☹️
🎁 PAID NCERT QUIZ BOT
🔷 जिनको भी NCERT का क्विज बोट चाहिए वो नीचे दिए गए नंबर पर पेमेंट करके screenshot सेंड कर दे l
🔺 NCERT HISTORY - RS 49
🔻 NCERT SCIENCE - RS 49
🔺NCERT GEOGRAPHY - RS 49
🔻NCERT POLITY - RS 49
🔺NCERT ECONOMICS - RS 49
⚠️Note - Ek साथ all Subject के लिए
ओनली 200 लगेंगे
🔷 विशेषताएं - इस में आप को क्लास 6th से 12th तक का 2,2 चैप्टर का एक साथ क्विज बोट और PDF मिलेगा जिसका टाइम 30 SEC रह…
Showing the 12 most recent of 440 posts we hold for @SelectionSeriesYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 37 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
वह उद्देश्य प्रस्ताव किसने पेश किया था जिसे बाद में भारत के संविधान की प्रस्तावना के रूप में अपनाया गया?
Who moved the Objective Resolution that was later adapted as the Preamble of the Constitution of India?
राजेंद्र प्रसाद/Rajendra Prasad13%
जे.बी. कृपलानी/J.B. Kripalani13%
जवाहरलाल नेहरू/Jawaharlal Nehru53%
बी.आर. अंबेडकर/B.R. Ambedkar22%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
निम्नलिखित में से संगीतकारों और उनके वाद्ययंत्रों की कौन सी जोड़ी गलत है?
Which of the following pairs of musicians and their instruments is INCORRECT?
के. वैद्यनाथन - सितार/K. Vaidyanathan - Sitar23%
पं. राम नारायण - सारंगी/Pt. Ram Narayan - Sarangi24%
उस्ताद विलायत खान - सितार/Ustad Vilayat Khan - Sitar32%
बिस्मिल्लाह खान - शहनाई/Bismillah Khan - Shehnai21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
राजस्व व्यय योजना का संबंध ............ से है।
Plan revenue expenditure relates to ............ .
I. Five-year plans II. Salaries and pensions I. पंचवर्षीय योजनाएँ II. वेतन और पेंशन
केवल l/Only I11%
न तो I और न ही II/Neither I nor II25%
I और II दोनों/Both I and II44%
केवल ll /Only II20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
हॉर्नबिल महोत्सव कितने दिनों तक चलता है?
For how many days is the Hornbill festival held?
512%
1039%
1530%
2020%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 440 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BPSC Teacher Daroga Bihar GK GS ™ @BPSC_Teacher_Daroga_Bihar_GK_GS · 154,292 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
NCERT QUIZ BOT ™ @VikasNCERT · 233,559 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
BIHAR DAROGA SI BSSC BPSC GK GS AEDO @BIHAR_DAROGA_SI_BSSC_GK_GS_AEDO · 178,284 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Online Gk Current Affairs Quiz™ SSC UPSC BPSC MPSC Banking Exams🎯 @Online_upsc_bpsc_mpsc_gk_quiz · 294,208 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Strategy Classes - Bank SSC PCS 🏆 @SSC_Quiz_daily · 221,217 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
संविधान Constitution Polity Quiz Notes @Constitution_Polity_Quiz_Notes · 125,408 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Gk Quiz Area™ { GENERAL KNOWLEDGE GK QUIZ } @Khan_Sir_Gk_Kumar_Gaurav_Sir_Utk · 206,671 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
NCERT GK QUIZ || UPSC SSC || @UPSC_SSC_Lucent_Static_Gk_Quiz · 25,537 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
🎖️𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐓 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐇𝐔𝐁🎖️ @Expert_Quiz · 109,192 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 14 August 2026
Quiz Empire 🚀 @All_sub_quiz_and_poll · 211,314 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
IIT JAM UGC CSIR NET EXAMS @Exams_Point · 189,137 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC NCERT HISTORY GEOGRAPHY QUIZ @UPSC_History_Geography_Quiz · 221,961 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Railway Science Gk MCQ Quiz ™ RRB Railway NTPC ALP Gs Quiz Hindi @RRB_Railway_NTPC_ALP_Science_Gk · 189,171 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐒 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐇𝐔𝐁™ @Brics92 · 184,074 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
SSC ENGLISH GRAMMAR CGL CHSL GD MTS @SSC_ENGLISH_GRAMMAR_CGL_GD_MTS · 223,399 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC EPFO APFC Current Affairs @UPSC_EPFO_APFC_Current_Affairs · 252,291 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
UPSC SSC GD Exam Lucent Static GK @UPSC_SSC_Exam_Lucent_Static_GK · 223,341 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
🎓𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐇 (𝐔𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐒𝐒𝐂 𝐑𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐖𝐀𝐘 𝐔𝐏 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐄 DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙) @ALL_15SEC_QUIZ · 221,591 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
RAILWAY NTPC RRB ALP JE RPF POLICE GROUP D @Railway_RRB_ALP_NTPC_RPF_Group_D · 237,894 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC (PRE + Mains) 2026-27 ™” (@SelectionSeriesYT), 204,733 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SelectionSeriesYT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.