Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ангедония🪽

Channel

Ангедония🪽

@SeraphimWrites

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

210subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002443767039
TypeChannel
Username@SeraphimWrites
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeraphimWrites

Growth

2072112096 August 2026 — 207 subscribers6 August 2026 — 208 subscribers7 August 2026 — 208 subscribers13 August 2026 — 209 subscribers20 August 2026 — 207 subscribers27 August 2026 — 211 subscribers2 September 2026 — 210 subscribers2106 August 20262 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 27 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 206–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 11:44210-1
27 Aug 2026, 10:08211+4
20 Aug 2026, 23:16207-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:18209+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:47208no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:40208+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:24207first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

444 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊17138.5%
custom 52332432616189061927116.0%
custom 52334685154737155695512.4%
custom 52469769392389008644510.1%
custom 5233665353824889455347.66%
custom 5246936042560306503224.95%
custom 5323714866513471953224.95%
custom 5233238824917688825153.38%
custom 532108625633400761192.03%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC67 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В общем. Я не умер, честное слово. Работаю над текстом в зин. А ещё у меня идея на Митя/Одетта с рпп как главная тема.

🕊12custom 52332432616189061926

4 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC97 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Да, Я до сих пор не могу нормально пройти ивент «Фонталия» и зачистить Луну, потому что мне тупо СТРАШНО попадаться на эту даму и ещё с ней взаимодействовать.

custom 523324326161890619213🕊4custom 52336653538248894552

4 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC98 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дело не в том, что Я хейтер женских персонажей, когда говорю о своих НЕлюбимчиках или констатирую тот факт, что у меня мало любимых героинь. Дело в том, что почти любой женский персонаж становится жертвой бизнеса, чей потенциал и чья личность превращаются в картон, многогранность – в шаблон, под которым легче построить любовную линию (или хотя бы дать на неё намёк). В частности множество женских персонажей не сущест

custom 523324326161890619214🕊4custom 52336653538248894553

3 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC121 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В 21 веке и не уметь прописывать живых женских персонажей… Это надо уметь (деградировать).

🕊19custom 52336653538248894556custom 52332432616189061923

3 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC122 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я видел множество репрезентаций тропа младший брат/старший брат, некровные сын/отец, ученик/учитель… И думал, что будет хорошая репрезентация всех этих тропов с ГЕРОИНЯМИ. Но почему-то вместо того, чтобы сделать комплексную персонажку, Хойо снова непонятно что творят. И сливы, бесконечно много сливов, которые противоречат друг другу и не поймёшь, кто есть кто и что где когда.

🕊14custom 52336653538248894556custom 52332432616189061923

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC116 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Митя и Одетта – сиблинги? Я хотел напечатать с ними фф, но мнения в фандоме так разнятся, что не знаю, кому верить.

🕊12

1 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC192 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Топ самых прописанных персонажей Нод-Края. 🤍 1. Иллуги. 2. Всё тот же Иллуги.

🕊12

31 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC201 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А можно вернуть старый формат? Этот ощущается как-то неправильно (о том, как выглядит работа, переходя на неё при чтении).

🕊16custom 52332432616189061921custom 52336653538248894551

31 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC204 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мой друг хорошо объяснил позицию Шэдоу в последних обновлениях: «местный Дотторе».

🕊19custom 52332432616189061921custom 52336653538248894551

31 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC199 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фанфакт из чайника: Лоэн распознаёт шаги своих коллег.

🕊15custom 52332432616189061926custom 52336653538248894555

29 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC221 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дружеское напоминание, что персонаж для прописанности и раскрытия не обязан быть кем-то великим. К этим же ребятам Я могу тогда спокойно отнести Лоэна, чья предыстория это история обычного человека, который не всегда будет в силах кому-либо противостоять. Можно отнести Ка Мина. Мальчика с довольно «банальной» для людей историей, и при этом живой, с ним можно себя ассоциировать. В ивенте она была прекрасно раскрыта.

🕊18custom 52332432616189061921custom 52336653538248894551

29 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC150 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а) Нет, Я до сих пор люблю пейринги из этой Вселенной. б) Нет, фанфики по крк не отменяются и будут печататься дальше (зависит сугубо от моего вдохновения). в) Нет, Я буду подаваться в зины по крк. г) И да, Я буду дальше дополнять сюжет своими канонами.

🕊14custom 52469360425603065037custom 52332432616189061926custom 52334685154737155693

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SeraphimWrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ангедония🪽” (@SeraphimWrites), 210 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeraphimWrites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.