Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Deicide 🪽.

Channel

Deicide 🪽.

@Seraphimisgod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002669823587
TypeChannel
Username@Seraphimisgod
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Seraphimisgod

Growth

201204202.58 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 August 2026 — 203 subscribers16 August 2026 — 204 subscribers24 August 2026 — 202 subscribers1 September 2026 — 201 subscribers10 September 2026 — 204 subscribers17 September 2026 — 201 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 40 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:21201-3
10 Sept 2026, 01:56204+3
1 Sept 2026, 00:17201-1
24 Aug 2026, 05:06202-2
16 Aug 2026, 19:23204+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:30203-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:18204no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:52204first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52084464311441988571423.3%
custom 52063887337875414281220.0%
custom 5262508498758952292813.3%
😭711.7%
💋610.0%
🕊610.0%
custom 541149573882161065735.00%
custom 542920124757813359535.00%
custom 540448805300156277811.67%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне скучно.

custom 52084464311441988572

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! некромант не скрывайте своё лицо, вы такой красивый!по губам и глазам уже можно понять что у вас безумно красивая внешность.) ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 52625084987589522921

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Примерно благодарен🤩. Вероятно, когда нибудь выйду из образа.

💋1custom 54292012475781335951

7 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC46 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ок.

custom 52084464311441988576🕊3custom 52063887337875414283custom 54044880530015627781custom 54114957388216106571

7 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(щас я ломаюсь неделю покупать ли туш за двести рублей.)

💋4

7 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня флешбеки как я десять лет назад жил в Италии какое-то время в горах возле эвкалиптовых садов и как гулял там в тумане... Я хочу туда.

😭4custom 52625084987589522922custom 52084464311441988571

6 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вы же понимаете, что в адекватном состоянии, не стригутся под сложный вульф-кат детскими ножницами в ванной.

6 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC61 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟.

custom 52084464311441988574🕊2custom 52063887337875414282😭1custom 54114957388216106571custom 54292012475781335951

5 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52063887337875414282

5 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC68 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я настрагвл себе вульф-кат как мог. Блять. Пока. Чё вы ничтожества или как. Нет не актуально. Извините. 🤩🤩🤩.

custom 52063887337875414285custom 52625084987589522925😭2🕊1custom 52084464311441988571custom 54114957388216106571custom 54292012475781335951

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Seraphimisgod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Deicide 🪽.” (@Seraphimisgod), 201 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Seraphimisgod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.