Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки сербского психиатра🤓

Channel

Записки сербского психиатра🤓

@Serbianpsychiatrist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

490subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002996015702
TypeChannel
Username@Serbianpsychiatrist
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 November 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Serbianpsychiatrist

Growth

4903 Nov 2026, 08:22 — 490 subscribers3 Nov 2026, 17:20 — 490 subscribers3 Nov 2026, 08:223 Nov 2026, 17:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 489–491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 17:20490no change
3 Nov 2026, 08:22490first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 490 subscribers
Avg views / post
211
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held11 (22 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total422
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2177.8%
👍27.41%
🎉13.70%
👏13.70%
🔥13.70%
😢13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Serbianpsychiatrist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC193 viewsread 3 November 2026

В конце октября будет кое-что интересное 🤭

22 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC229 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @auditoria_belgradePhoto

😏СДВГ под маской: почему со стороны всё нормально, а вам тяжело? Вы вполне справляетесь с работой, не опаздываете на встречи, помните о дедлайнах и производите впечатление человека, у которого всё под контролем. Но сколько сил уходит на то, чтобы всё это удерживать? Иногда за организованностью скрывается постоянное напряжение. Человек по несколько раз перепроверяет свою работу, боится забыть о важной встрече, стара…

❤4

6 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC372 views2 reactions3 Starsread 3 November 2026
Video

Почему человек с СДВГ перебивает других? Ты перебиваешь людей, а потом ругаешь себя за это? Многих за такое с детства считали невоспитанными. На самом деле причины другие, и с ними можно работать. Почему так происходит? 👉Трудно сделать паузу перед словами. При СДВГ слабее работает самоконтроль. Ты говоришь раньше, чем успеваешь решить, подходит ли сейчас момент. 👉Трудно удерживать мысль в голове. Пока собеседник го…

❤2

28 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC419 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026

На что заменить вортиоксетин, флувоксамин, луразидон и атомоксетин в Сербии? Переезд в другую страну иногда внезапно превращает стабильную терапию в квест: препарат, который человек принимал годами, невозможно найти в аптеке. Но психиатрические препараты нельзя заменять по принципу: этого нет, значит, возьмём что-нибудь из той же группы. Нужно понимать, зачем конкретно был назначен препарат. 1. Вортиоксетин Ворти…

❤2

24 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC357 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Один из частых вопросов пациентов, который я слышу - что делать с цикличными мыслями? Ответ ☝️

23 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC333 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Что реально помогает при депрессии, а что нет? В ролике я говорил про исследования БАДов: чем слабее методология, тем эффектнее цифры в итоге. Разберём по-честному, что действительно работает, а что нет. Основа лечения Психотерапия, особенно КПТ, при лёгкой и умеренной депрессии по эффекту сопоставима с антидепрессантами. Антидепрессанты нужны при умеренной и тяжёлой депрессии, и лучше всего работают вместе с терап…

❤1

16 Sept 2026, 06:15 UTC366 views3 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Почему после выполненной задачи тревога не отпускает? Ты всё сделал. Но вместо облегчения начинаешь перепроверять, искать ошибку или думать, что расслабляться рано. Так часто работает гиперконтроль. Схема простая: тревога - проверка - краткое облегчение - ещё больше проверок в будущем Мозг учится: если я контролирую, значит я в безопасности. Поэтому покой сам начинает ощущаться непривычно. Что можно попробовать…

❤3

12 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Антидепрессанты не энергетики! Антидепрессант не должен ощущаться как кофе, энергетик или внезапный прилив счастья. Более того, выраженное возбуждение и эйфория вообще не являются нормальным критерием эффективности. Если препарат работает, изменения часто выглядят гораздо прозаичнее: • стало немного легче вставать с кровати; • тревожные мысли занимают не четыре часа, а один; • плаксивость сохраняется, но быстрее п…

❤3👏1

11 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC293 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Тревога — это не характер «Я просто тревожный человек. У меня такой характер». Эту фразу я регулярно слышу от пациентов. Человек годами живёт с постоянным напряжением, прокручивает в голове худшие сценарии, прислушивается к телу, избегает каких-то ситуаций и постепенно начинает считать всё это частью своей личности. Но «тревожный по характеру» не диагноз. Да, люди действительно отличаются по темпераменту. Кто-то о…

😢1

24 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC478 views8 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Забота о себе укрепляет тревогу Представьте: однажды вам стало плохо в лифте. На следующий день вы пошли пешком и почувствовали облегчение. Мозг сделал вывод: «Я спасся, потому что избежал лифта». 🔄Проблема в том, что он не получил другой опыт: «Я мог войти, тревога поднялась бы и потом снизилась сама». Так избегание быстро уменьшает страх сегодня, но подтверждает опасность на завтра. Каждый раз, когда вы обходите …

❤4👍2🎉1🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC407 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

«Но я же работаю. Какая у меня может быть депрессия?» 😱 Человек с депрессией может продолжать ходить на работу, отвечать на сообщения, даже шутить. Со стороны, он собран. Внутри, любое действие требует усилия, которое не видно снаружи. Работоспособность в такой ситуации часто держится не на ресурсе, а на страхе последствий, привычке или жёстком самоконтроле. Человек боится, если он сейчас даст себе «слабину», то буд…

❤2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Serbianpsychiatrist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки сербского психиатра🤓” (@Serbianpsychiatrist), 490 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Serbianpsychiatrist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.