Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушано Серпухов

Channel

Подслушано Серпухов

@Serplife

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,634subscribers

+439 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387136648
TypeChannel
Username@Serplife
Description☆ Только живые эмоции ☆ Самые свежие новости ☆ vk.com/serplife Служба поддержки : https://vk.com/im?media=&sel=472528046&v= https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676580296aa9672b96f992b4
Created9 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Serplife

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,19523,67623,435.57 August 2026 — 23,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,202 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,224 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,231 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,252 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,263 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,278 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,312 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,305 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,357 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,358 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,362 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,369 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,372 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,373 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,396 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,390 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,391 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,388 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,385 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,403 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,422 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,433 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,470 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,492 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,486 subscribers30 September 2026 — 23,552 subscribers5 October 2026 — 23,549 subscribers9 October 2026 — 23,577 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,582 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,589 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,597 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,600 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,603 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,596 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,598 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,599 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,644 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,676 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,673 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,660 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,659 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,650 subscribers28 October 2026 — 23,633 subscribers29 October 2026 — 23,634 subscribers30 October 2026 — 23,625 subscribers31 October 2026 — 23,626 subscribers1 November 2026 — 23,620 subscribers2 November 2026 — 23,624 subscribers4 November 2026 — 23,631 subscribers5 November 2026 — 23,630 subscribers5 November 2026 — 23,634 subscribers23,6347 August 20265 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 91 days, net +439. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,123–23,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:4623,634+4
5 Nov 2026, 02:2023,630-1
4 Nov 2026, 01:0723,631+7
2 Nov 2026, 21:5623,624+4
1 Nov 2026, 19:5023,620-6
31 Oct 2026, 17:4723,626+1
30 Oct 2026, 14:3523,625-9
29 Oct 2026, 12:4523,634+1
28 Oct 2026, 13:3923,633-17
27 Oct 2026, 11:4723,650-9
26 Oct 2026, 14:0723,659-1
25 Oct 2026, 12:0723,660-13
24 Oct 2026, 09:5823,673-3
23 Oct 2026, 11:2523,676+32
22 Oct 2026, 10:2723,644+45
21 Oct 2026, 06:4423,599+1
20 Oct 2026, 07:0823,598+2
19 Oct 2026, 05:5823,596-7
18 Oct 2026, 03:2623,603+3
17 Oct 2026, 01:2923,600first reading

Engagement

519 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 23,634 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
170 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
177
of 519 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held519 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total546,723
Reactions total4,028
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,550
Videos
≈1,270
Links
≈244

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 46m
Average length
2m 48s

Measured directly from 81 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,056 reactions across 484 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,82129.3%
👍1,39510.7%
👎1,2739.75%
🤬1,2169.31%
🙏1,1408.73%
🤣9567.32%
😨8296.35%
🔥8136.23%
😭6925.30%
👏2351.80%
💯1971.51%
🤩1250.957%
🥰1230.942%
🤪1010.774%
😘780.597%
👌340.26%
😍280.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 490 of the 519 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,056 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 519 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 496 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Serplife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 519 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.47%
18 of 519 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
18
posts carrying an erid · 18 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,190
over 18 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,420
over 478 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquWnhud120 August 202620 August 2026
2Vtzqv84Ci916 October 20266 October 2026
2VtzqvYDaBF112 October 202612 October 2026
2Vtzqvb7VHf17 October 20267 October 2026
2VtzqvgvQ4d19 October 20269 October 2026
2VtzqvkAt7d121 August 202621 August 2026
2VtzqvoEtCs118 August 202618 August 2026
2Vtzqvwt7MD12 September 20262 September 2026
2Vtzqw3hDzn13 November 20263 November 2026
2VtzqwCfAZ119 August 20269 August 2026
2VtzqwryXTy130 August 202630 August 2026
2VtzqwvV5uW130 September 202630 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 6 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 519 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 177 posts held from the last 30 days (17.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,290 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Участник СВО из Серпухова добился денежной выплаты вместо земельного участка. Прокуратура Подмосковья: суд подтвердил право участника СВО на денежную выплату, сообщает издание Регион. Участник СВО из Серпухова добился права на единовременную денежную выплату вместо земельного участка после обращения в прокуратуру. Ранее ему отказали в поддержке из-за отсутствия регистрации в Московской области на день завершения сл…

👍12❤1

6 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,130 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вечером 4 ноября в деревне Шатово не вернулось домой 45 овец❗️ Их было 45 штук, все белого цвета. Если есть у кого информация по нахождению пропажи или может видели проездом, просим сообщить по телефону: +79299777040 Сергей

😨31😭7🤣4❤2🙏2

6 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC≈2,490 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

От подписчика: В Серпухове по ул советская 85б , 1 подъезд, замерзают люди. Отопление холодное с начала отопительного сезона. Батареи теплели на пару дней и все. В квартире 17 градусов. По каким адресам еще не дали отопления?

🙏8

5 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC≈2,990 views80 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Екатерина Мизулина вступилась за пиццу в школьной столовой "Лучше бы вместо отмены пиццы наши чиновники озаботились вопросом качества питания в учебных заведениях и его стоимости", — написала общественница.

❤44👍36

5 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC≈3,180 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤2👍1👎1

5 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC≈3,140 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

!Еще не нашли ПОМОГИТЕ НАЙТИ БАБУШКУ В Серпухове (г.о. Протвино) пропала 76-летняя #Осинина Мария Ивановна. С 25 октября 2026 года ее местонахождение неизвестно. Женщина нуждается в медицинской помощи, возможна потеря памяти! ИЩЕМ ДОБРОВОЛЬЦЕВ! Если у вас есть возможность помочь с расклейкой ориентировок у себя в городе, или у вас есть какая-либо информация о ее местонахождении. Каждый репост может спасти жизнь!

🙏40❤8

5 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈4,020 views137 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Егорка Крид снова в Серпухове 🔥

👎93🔥21❤8😨7🤬4🤩2🤪2

5 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,820 views63 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

"Икарус" Раритетная классика появилась на вокзале в Серпухове 🥰 Кино снимают 👍

🔥51👍9❤3

5 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈3,930 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👎2❤1👌1🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 519 posts we hold for @Serplife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Serplife edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 23 posts on @Serplife as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTCAnonymous Poll576 voters

Серпуховичи все реже ездят на работу в Москву, так решили аналитики из МГУ РАН. А Вы едите на работу в Москву ?

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет, ищу (или) работаю в Серпухове54%
  3. Я еще учусь, не знаю.20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 519 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Серпухов | Новости, Подслушано, самое интересное
@serpukhov · 26,362
#1
Серпухов
@Serpukhov_LIVE · 4,531
#2
ВАДИМ Я ХОЧУ ТЕБЯ
@vadim_va22 · 6
#3
Умар Кремлев
@umar_kremlev · 135,459
#4
Официальный Серпухов
@serpuhov_live · 5,490
#5
МБОУ СОШ №19 имени Романа Катасонова
@serp_shkola19 · 1,480
#6
Подслушано Протвино
@podslyshano_protvino · 7,719
#7
MARVEL CREW
@MarvelCrew · 351
#8
SMItanka - Серпухов
@smitanka_ru · 2,242
#9
вайб-это
@waidto · 371
#10
SERPKOLL.MEDIA
@serpkollmedia · 1,062
#11

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Серпухов | Новости, Подслушано, самое интересное
@serpukhov · 26,362
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 September 2026
Умар Кремлев
@umar_kremlev · 135,459
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано Серпухов” (@Serplife), 23,634 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Serplife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.