Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐌𝐄𝐊

Channel

𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐌𝐄𝐊

@Sevmek_lovee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,474subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001346307542
TypeChannel
Username@Sevmek_lovee
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sevmek_lovee

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,38810,61910,503.57 August 2026 — 10,619 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,619 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,603 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,585 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,576 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,552 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,537 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,492 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,482 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,475 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,464 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,424 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,414 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,398 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,388 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,439 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,466 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,478 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,500 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,496 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,494 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,489 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,480 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,499 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,498 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,480 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,474 subscribers10,4747 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,353–10,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:5710,474-6
15 Sept 2026, 20:1710,480-18
14 Sept 2026, 03:2010,498-1
12 Sept 2026, 10:1610,499+19
10 Sept 2026, 05:1810,480-9
7 Sept 2026, 02:1510,489-5
4 Sept 2026, 12:3810,494-2
2 Sept 2026, 23:2610,496-4
1 Sept 2026, 21:3410,500+4
31 Aug 2026, 23:5810,496+18
30 Aug 2026, 22:3710,478+12
30 Aug 2026, 00:1110,466+27
28 Aug 2026, 23:4310,439+51
27 Aug 2026, 20:5410,388-10
26 Aug 2026, 18:2310,398-16
25 Aug 2026, 18:5610,414-10
24 Aug 2026, 18:2710,424-13
23 Aug 2026, 03:5810,437-17
21 Aug 2026, 13:5810,454-10
20 Aug 2026, 10:5410,464first reading

Engagement

225 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.982%
avg views ÷ 10,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 225 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held225 (5 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total7,408
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 01s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 32 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5471.1%
🔥810.5%
😁67.89%
👎45.26%
👏45.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 225 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 225 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gif_Hotly

باورنکردنیه ولی کاملاً واقعی! 😱👇 وقتی #فاطمه فرم رو پر می‌کرد، فکرشم نمی‌کرد ۲ میلیون تومنش قراره بشه ۴۳ میلیون تومان ولی توی بت فیدو، فاصله بین یه تصمیم ساده با یک برد میلیونی فقط چند دقیقه است. 🎯💎 https://t.me/+dySI_QFj0T0xZGVk

1

29 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💖رویایی که برای #ملیکا از اصفهان واقعیت شد! 👑 🚫با فقط ۲ میلیون تومان شروع کرد و توانست ۴۳ میلیون تومان برنده بشه! 👑👑 گاهی وقت‌ها فقط یک تصمیم درست و یک انتخاب هوشمندانه لازمه تا همه‌چیز تغییر کنه. سایت بت فیدو همون جاییه که فرصت‌های شگفت‌انگیز انتظار تورو می‌کشن. ✅💎 g7 🚀 همین الان وارد سایت بشو، شانس خودت رو امتحان کن و برنده بعدی تو باش!💲👇 👑 https://fido08bazi20.click 👑 https://fido08bazi20.click 🍿جوایز میلیون د

1

29 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

‌‌قصد دارم: تا آخرین لحظه نفس کشیدنم تو را دوست بدارم♥️✨ ‌

3

29 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 فاطمه از تهران با پیشبینی در بازی های جام جهانی مبلغ 500میلیون تومان برنده شد حالا امروز بازی ⚽️⚽️استقلال و فولاد رو مساوی پیشبینی کرده اگه توام میخوای پول بزرگ در بیاری در سایت پیشنهادی ما #اندوبت 🟡🔴🟡🔴 🎯 شروعی مطمئن‌تر ⚡ پرداخت سریع 💬 پشتیبانی ۲۴/۷ همین حالا شروع کن و ۲۴ ساعت اول را تجربه کن! r6 ☑ همین حالا در ثبت نام کن🚨👇 📎 https://undo6841.click 📎 https://undo6841.click 💥کانال تلگرام: 👇 https://t.me/+R

1

29 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gayande_t

✅👇#فاطمه از تهران بازی امروز استقلال و فولاد رو مساوی پیشبینی کرده اگه توام میخوای پول بزرگ در بیاری در سایت پیشنهادی ما #اندوبت ✅👇 https://t.me/+RLAjZit9CsxmMGM8 https://t.me/+RLAjZit9CsxmMGM8

1

28 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC32 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#مهسا از #شیراز 👑دیشب با یک موجودی ۲ میلیون تومانی شروع کرد و چند ساعت بعد، حسابش ۴۳ میلیون تومان شارژ شد. بدون فرمول پیچیده، بدون شانسِ عجیب‌وغریب؛ فقط با تصمیم‌گیری درست در زمان مناسب.👑 توی سایت اندو بت، برنده شدن یک اتفاق اتفاقی نیست؛ نتیجه‌ی بستر منصفانه و الگوریتم‌های استاندارده. بردهای بزرگ دور از دسترس👑 نیستند، اگر از جای درست شروع کنید.👑 A6 📊 مشخصات این برد: * مبلغ اولیه: ۲,۰۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان * مبلغ برداشت: ۴۳,

28 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC32 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunFarm

✅👇#مهسا از شیراز بازی دیشب رئال رو پیشبینی کرد اگه توام میخوای پول بزرگ در بیاری در سایت پیشنهادی ما #اندوبت ✅👇 https://t.me/+RLAjZit9CsxmMGM8 https://t.me/+RLAjZit9CsxmMGM8

Showing the 12 most recent of 225 posts we hold for @Sevmek_lovee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐌𝐄𝐊” (@Sevmek_lovee), 10,474 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sevmek_lovee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.