Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐’๐„๐˜๐…๐€๐ฅ-๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐Œ แต’แถ แถ โฑแถœโฑแตƒหก ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

Channel

๐’๐„๐˜๐…๐€๐ฅ-๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐Œ แต’แถ แถ โฑแถœโฑแตƒหก ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

@Seyfalislam_official

On this record: Topic ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

16,087subscribers

-1,680 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001189233018
TypeChannel
Username@Seyfalislam_official
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Seyfalislam_official

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channelโ€™s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ€” 60%, no better than a coin flip โ€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,08717,76716,9276 August 20268 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,680. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 15,835โ€“18,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 06:4816,087-37
7 Nov 2026, 01:5916,124-18
6 Nov 2026, 01:5916,142-12
5 Nov 2026, 03:1916,154-24
4 Nov 2026, 02:2716,178-13
3 Nov 2026, 01:5016,191-12
2 Nov 2026, 04:4916,203-13
1 Nov 2026, 05:4816,216-16
31 Oct 2026, 02:5616,232-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:4716,240-11
29 Oct 2026, 05:3116,251-11
28 Oct 2026, 06:1016,262-28
27 Oct 2026, 08:0816,290-13
26 Oct 2026, 07:1416,303-4
25 Oct 2026, 08:5616,307-9
24 Oct 2026, 08:5816,316-25
23 Oct 2026, 09:3016,341-11
22 Oct 2026, 12:5716,352-27
21 Oct 2026, 10:0016,379-10
20 Oct 2026, 06:0816,389first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
3.57%
avg views รท 16,087 subscribers
Avg views / post
574
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held35 (29 June 2026 โ€“ 7 November 2026)
Views total1,722
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
63
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 30 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค13781.5%
๐Ÿ‘2716.1%
๐Ÿ•Š21.19%
๐Ÿ‘10.595%
๐Ÿฅฐ10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 06:49 UTC565 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @seyfal_islaamPhoto

Sultaan Abdulhaamiid II imala Hajjii ummata isaatiif salphisuu fi tokkummaa Uummata Islaamaa (Pan-Islamism) jabeessuuf Sarara Baaburaa Hijaz (Hejaz Railway) ijaarsise. Garuu wanti nama gaddisiisu Naannoo waraana Addunyaa 1ffaa (1914-1918) Biyyoonji Awroophaa keessattuu Ingiliz Kilaafaa Islaamaa Dhabamsiisuuf jecha Araboota Gowwoomsanii itti bobbaasan, Sababuma kanaanis Baaburri Hujjaajota Qabatee ture sun Boonbidhanโ€ฆ

โค3๐Ÿ‘3

10 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC971 views22 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Mee Namoonni Active Taatan ๐Ÿ‘ Tuqaa

๐Ÿ‘21๐Ÿ•Š1

26 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTCโ‰ˆ1,300 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026

แŠฅแŒ„แŠ• แŠ แˆแˆฐแŒฅแˆ แ‰ฐแˆตแ‹ แ‰†แˆญแŒฌ แŠ แˆแˆ†แŠ•แˆ แ‰ฃแŠซแŠแฃ แˆ˜แ‰ฝ แ‹ญแˆจแˆณแŠ›แˆ แŒ€แ‰ฃแˆฉ แŠจแˆ‹แ‹ญ แ‹จแˆแ‰ค แŒ แŒ‹แŠ แข

โค5๐Ÿฅฐ1

23 Sept 2026, 15:54 UTCโ‰ˆ1,440 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ุงู„ู„ูŽู‘ู‡ูู…ูŽู‘ ุตูŽู„ูู‘ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ูู‘ู…ู’ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุฎูŽุงุชูŽู…ู ุงู„ู†ูŽู‘ุจููŠูู‘ูŠู†ูŽ ู…ูุญูŽู…ูŽู‘ุฏู ๏ทบ

โค9

6 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTCโ‰ˆ1,870 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @miiltooproductionPhoto

Miiltoo 18 Sagantaan keenya Fakkeenya jaalalaa 3 haala hawwataafii miidhagaadhaan itti fufee jira แˆšแˆแ‰ถ 18 แ‹จแแ‰…แˆญ แ‰ฐแˆแˆณแˆŒแ‰ต แˆˆแ‹จแ‰ต แŠฅแŠ“ แ‹ฐแˆ˜แ‰… แ‰ฃแˆˆ แˆแŠ”แ‰ณ แŠฅแŠ•แ‹ฐ แ‰€แŒ แˆˆ แ‹ญแŒˆแŠ›แˆแข

โค7

2 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTCโ‰ˆ3,050 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Dubartiin Sammuu Qajelaa Qabdu Yaadaa fi qaama ishee Eeggachuufis Ta'ee Haguuggachuuf Ajaja Dhiiraa Hin eeggattu.

โค18

31 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTCโ‰ˆ1,210 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @miiltooproductionPhoto

แ‹จแˆšแˆแ‰ถ 18 แˆ˜แŒแ‰ขแ‹ซ แ‰ตแŠฌแ‰ต แŠ แ‹ตแˆซแˆปแ‹Žแ‰ฝ 1- แˆ˜แˆญแŠซแ‰ถ แŠ แŠ•แ‹ฐแˆ‰แˆต แˆ›แ‰ฐแˆšแ‹ซ แˆธแˆ› แ‰ฐแˆซ แˆ…แŠ•แƒ แ‹จแˆฑแ‰… แ‰แŒฅแˆญ 113 2- แˆ˜แˆญแŠซแ‰ถ แˆแ‰ตแˆ‚ แˆ˜แˆตแŒ‚แ‹ต แŠแ‰ตแˆˆแŠแ‰ต แŠ แ‰ฅแ‹ฑแˆแˆแ‰ณแˆ… แˆžแ‰ฃแ‹ญแˆ แ‰คแ‰ต 3- แŠ แŒ‚แ• แˆซแˆšแˆต แ‰ฃแŠ•แŠญ แŠ‘แˆญ แˆ˜แˆตแŒ‚แ‹ต แŠ แŒ แŒˆแ‰ฅ แŠฅแŠ•แ‹ฒแˆแˆ แ‰ แˆตแˆแŠญ แ‰แŒฅแˆฎแ‰ปแ‰ฝแŠ• แ‰ แˆ˜แ‹ฐแ‹ˆแˆ แˆ›แŒแŠ˜แ‰ต แ‰ตแ‰ฝแˆ‹แˆ‹แ‰ฝแˆ +251907282396 +251917493009 #แˆšแˆแ‰ถ_18 #แ‹จแแ‰…แˆญ_แ‰ฐแˆแˆณแˆŒแ‰ต_3 #แŒณแŒ‰แˆœ_1 #แŠจแŒฅแ‹‹แ‰ฑ 2:30 แŒ€แˆแˆฎ #แˆ€แŠ’แˆ‹แŠ•แ‹ต แˆ†แ‰ดแˆ!! @miiltooproduction @miiltooproductio

โค4

30 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTCโ‰ˆ2,560 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Abbaa Gaaddisaa ๐Ÿ’š ุฑุญู…ูƒ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ูŠุง ุตุงุญุจ ุงู„ุธู„ุงู„ Hagayya - 29 / 1966 Saayid Kuxb Guyyaa itti wareegame. Qaamaan Deemus, yaadaa fi Seenaan isaa jiraataadha.

โค5

28 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTCโ‰ˆ1,140 viewsread 8 November 2026

ู…ูˆู„ุงูŠูŽ ุตู„ู‘ู ูˆุณู„ู‘ูู… ุฏุงุฆู…ู‹ุง ุฃุจุฏู‹ุง.. ุนู„ู‰ ุญุจูŠุจูƒูŽ ุฎูŠุฑู ุงู„ุฎู„ู‚ู ูƒู„ู‡ูู…ู..!๐Ÿ’›

25 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTCโ‰ˆ1,360 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ุงู„ู„ูŽู‘ู‡ูู…ูŽู‘ ุตูŽู„ูู‘ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ูู‘ู…ู’ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุฎูŽูŠู’ุฑู ุงู„ู’ุฎูŽู„ู’ู‚ู ู…ูุญูŽู…ูŽู‘ุฏู ๏ทบ ๐Ÿ’š

โค7

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Seyfalislam_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Seyfalislam_official as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MILKAA'INA JIREENYAA
@milkaaina_jireenyaa ยท 20,782
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 55 here โ€” alongside 54 others โ€” read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐’๐„๐˜๐…๐€๐ฅ-๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐Œ แต’แถ แถ โฑแถœโฑแตƒหก ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธโ€ (@Seyfalislam_official), 16,087 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Seyfalislam_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.