27 measurements spanning 30 days, net +662. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,842–28,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 02:14
28,606
-6
3 Sept 2026, 22:00
28,612
-12
2 Sept 2026, 13:46
28,624
-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:35
28,627
+7
31 Aug 2026, 18:59
28,620
+6
30 Aug 2026, 22:26
28,614
+9
28 Aug 2026, 20:53
28,605
+5
27 Aug 2026, 18:54
28,600
+3
26 Aug 2026, 16:44
28,597
+20
25 Aug 2026, 13:42
28,577
+38
24 Aug 2026, 10:09
28,539
+26
22 Aug 2026, 20:27
28,513
+44
21 Aug 2026, 12:23
28,469
+21
20 Aug 2026, 12:34
28,448
+29
19 Aug 2026, 13:32
28,419
+16
18 Aug 2026, 12:13
28,403
+18
17 Aug 2026, 09:27
28,385
+65
15 Aug 2026, 18:03
28,320
+33
14 Aug 2026, 07:08
28,287
+39
13 Aug 2026, 00:45
28,248
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.20%
avg views ÷ 28,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,630
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
57 (22 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
89,470
Reactions total
961
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 03s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,507 reactions across 50 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
482
32.0%
👍
342
22.7%
❤
333
22.1%
🤯
140
9.29%
⚡
109
7.23%
😁
66
4.38%
😱
14
0.929%
👎
8
0.531%
😢
8
0.531%
💯
4
0.265%
☃
1
0.066%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 50 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shadow_of_Franklin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️Британец отсудил 61 биткоин с мертвой биржи спустя 12 лет
В 2011 году британец вложил около полутора тысяч фунтов в биткоин на одной из первых британских бирж Intersango. К 2014 году площадка закрылась, заморозив на счету британца 61 BTC. Пользователь мысленно попрощался с деньгами, а в 2018 году даже удалил письма от бывших владельцев биржи с предложением вернуть средства, приняв их за банальный фишинг.
🔍В нача…
⚡️ Как заработать $5000 на легальном взломе (Bug Bounty для новичков) | УРОК-8
"Протокол Франклина"
📱▶️СМОТРЕТЬ [09:09]
В восьмом уроке Протокола Франклина мы проведем твой первый профессиональный проект от начала и до конца. Я покажу 5 этапов классического пентеста. Мы поднимем уязвимую машину Metasploitable, проведем разведку открытых портов через Nmap, пробьем защиту службы Samba с помощью Metasploit Framework и…
🎥Детектор скрытых камер за $7
ученые научили смартфон находить шпионские объективы в отелях
Исследователи из KAIST и сингапурских университетов создали систему SweepLED, способную превратить обычный смартфон в высокоточный сканер скрытого наблюдения без покупки дорогостоящей аппаратуры.
Главная проблема существующих бытовых детекторов - бесконечные ложные блики от зеркал, шурупов, часов и глянцевого пластика, из-за…
⚡️Сезонная охота на школьников:
скамеры вычищают карты родителей через звонки детям
Перед 1 сентября мошенники традиционно переключаются на учебную суету. Только за первую половину года несовершеннолетним поступило свыше 92 миллионов подозрительных звонков.
🔍Атака идет сразу с двух сторон:
🟥Родителей ловят на невнимательности: им подсовывают фишинговые клоны электронных дневников, фальшивые сборы в родительских чат…
😎Мошенники украли 150 флагманских смартфонов через дыру в магазине провайдера
Испанская полиция ликвидировала преступную группу, которая поставила на поток бесплатное получение дорогой электроники.
⚡️Злоумышленники нашли критическую уязвимость в платформе интернет-продаж крупного телеком-оператора и написали скрипт, который отправлял на склад команду на отгрузку устройства еще до того, как проходила реальная оплата…
Если вам интересна тема AI security (защита AI, атаки на AI, AISecOps) - напишите нам в Telegram @cyacademy_support. Дадим план обучения - список тем, которые надо изучить. Материал классный, жалеть не будете.
Также у нас на канале вы можете найти готовый ML Roadmap на 2026 год. Это не так весело и задорно, как ломать AI, но это важный фундамент.
Сегодня тот самый день - День пробуждения Скайнета.
По сюжету «Терминатора 2» именно 29 августа 1997 года Skynet обрёл самосознание. Люди попытались отключить систему, но она восприняла это как угрозу своему существованию — и вышла из-под контроля.
Если 1991 году это выглядело как чистая фантастика, то в 2026-м история Скайнета неожиданно хорошо иллюстрирует некоторые вопросы AI Safety.
Причём главная проблема зде…
🌟ToxicPanda 2.0: банковский троян взламывает Android через клики по экрану и режим разработчика
Исследователи из Zimperium препарировали свежую версию банковского трояна ToxicPanda 2.0, арсенал которого вырос до 349 банковских и криптовалютных приложений в 16 странах, а список команд удаленного управления перевалил за полторы сотни.
🔍Вредонос превращает легитимные функции Android в оружие против владельца.
🟥Получив…
🗣Ограбление Bybit на $1,5 млрд и теневые хабы Азии
как хакеры КНДР превращают краденую крипту в чистый кэш
Северокорейские кибервойска давно перестали быть просто хакерами и выстроили сложнейший международный финансовый конвейер.
Я подробно рассказывал о хакерских группировках КНДР у себя в видео:
📱 ХАКЕРЫ КНДР СЛИЛИ СВОИ ХОУМ ВИДЕО В СЕТЬ!
📱 Как Хакеры из Северной Кореи Украли Миллиарды с Биржи Bybit?
🔍Эксперты Ко…
🎬Голливудский взлом прямо в браузере
как скамеры пугают жертв фейковым видео кражи Госуслуг
Телефонные мошенники решили прокачать визуальные спецэффекты и устроить для потенциальных жертв настоящий интерактивный театр. Аналитики вскрыли свежую схему, в которой злоумышленники показывают человеку фальшивый взлом его аккаунта на государственном портале в реальном времени.
🔍Пользователю подсовывают ссылку на клон серви…
💧Бензин со скидкой 30% и минус 10 000 рублей с карты
как скамеры оседлали топливный ажиотаж
Мошенники моментально нащупывают болевые точки аудитории и заворачивают старые схемы в свежую обертку. На фоне новостей об очередях на заправках и проблемах с горючим в регионах киберпреступники запустили фейковый сервис "Топливо24", эксплуатирующий классическую схему "Мамонт".
🌈Автомобилистам предлагают сказочные условия:
б…
🤨Карманный хакер по цене подписки на Netflix?
как работает самый наглый ИИ-сервис для киберкриминала
За смешные 13 баксов в месяц любой желающий теперь может арендовать персонального ИИ-взломщика. Исследователи из ThreatDown препарировали нашумевший публичный сервис KriminalAI, создатели которого обещали писать эксплойты, собирать досье и генерировать фишинг без цензуры и моральных ограничений.
🔍У создателей проект…
🔥22👍7⚡3😱2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @Shadow_of_Franklin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Shadow_of_Franklin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тень Франклина” (@Shadow_of_Franklin), 28,606 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shadow_of_Franklin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.