Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ShakhMovies | شاخ موویز

Channel

ShakhMovies | شاخ موویز

@ShakhMovies

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50,704subscribers

+1,044 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131038525
TypeChannel
Username@ShakhMovies
Descriptionشاخ موویز برای دیدن بهترین فیلم و سریال های مورد علاقه شماس ❤️ چنل اصلی مجموعه شاخ: @ShakhNews
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShakhMovies

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,34951,07150,2106 August 2026 — 49,660 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,487 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,349 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,351 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,071 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,975 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,990 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,810 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,563 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,823 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,768 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,661 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,575 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,566 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,427 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,469 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,385 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,299 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,197 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,099 subscribers30 August 2026 — 49,998 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,005 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,049 subscribers2 September 2026 — 49,966 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,102 subscribers4 September 2026 — 50,719 subscribers7 September 2026 — 50,607 subscribers10 September 2026 — 50,563 subscribers12 September 2026 — 50,853 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,899 subscribers16 September 2026 — 50,892 subscribers18 September 2026 — 50,704 subscribers50,7046 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,044. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,091–51,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:3850,704-188
16 Sept 2026, 01:3850,892-7
14 Sept 2026, 09:5950,899+46
12 Sept 2026, 23:0150,853+290
10 Sept 2026, 21:1850,563-44
7 Sept 2026, 23:2150,607-112
4 Sept 2026, 23:0150,719+617
3 Sept 2026, 09:2750,102+136
2 Sept 2026, 03:2449,966-83
1 Sept 2026, 03:4950,049+44
31 Aug 2026, 03:0350,005+7
30 Aug 2026, 05:1949,998-101
29 Aug 2026, 05:5850,099-98
28 Aug 2026, 07:4950,197-102
27 Aug 2026, 04:3450,299-86
26 Aug 2026, 03:4750,385-84
25 Aug 2026, 06:0750,469+42
24 Aug 2026, 08:0750,427-139
22 Aug 2026, 19:0450,566-9
21 Aug 2026, 12:4250,575first reading

Engagement

1,095 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.16%
avg views ÷ 50,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,140
589 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
589
of 1,095 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 583 of 589 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held1,095 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total2,435,607
Reactions total30,542
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,910
Videos
≈2,380
Links
≈521

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 50m
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 314 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

46,791 reactions across 965 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣11,91025.5%
❤11,01823.5%
🔥5,40411.5%
👎3,6887.88%
👍3,6337.76%
😐3,1546.74%
💔2,4925.33%
😁1,9314.13%
😍1,8333.92%
🤯9041.93%
👌5271.13%
😢2970.635%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 976 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ShakhMovies. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC656 views6 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

نمرات اولیه فیلم "Godzilla Minus Zero" اومد و امتیاز ۹۲٪ رو از Rotten Tomatoes گرفت. البته قسمت قبلیش نمره پشم سوز ۹۸٪ گرفته بود! #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

🔥4❤2

27 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,280 views11 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

بچه خوشگل های سینما رو در گذر زمان ببینین #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

🔥9❤2

27 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,720 views8 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

خبر بد اینه که شما فقط خودتون رو دارین خبر خوب هم همینه😉 #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

❤7😐1

27 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,080 views35 reactionsread 27 September 2026

‏یجوری دورم خلوت شده که انگار آقای خمسه ام @ShakhMovies

🤣29👍4❤1😁1

27 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC≈2,210 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

واقعا این همه سال تو اوج بودن هنر میخواد🤌 جنیفر لوپز در افتر پارتی Dolce & Gabbana #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

👍12👎4❤2

27 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTC≈2,380 views9 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

تریلر جدید فیلم "Werwulf" منتشر شد تا ثابت کنه اگرز تا روح و روان مخاطب رو شخم نزنه ول‌کن نیست! ​📅 اکران: ۴ دی #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

🔥5❤2👎2

27 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,670 views68 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

ولی جدی این فیلمبردار روانی ترین سادیسمی تاریخ سینما بود😂 همه مون ولی تو عروسیا حداقل یه بار گیر همچین فیلمبرداری افتادیم #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

🤣66❤2

26 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC≈3,360 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇺 فرداشب لیگ ملت‌های اروپا پرهیجان دنبال خواهد شد؛ بازی‌هایی که روی کاغذ ساده‌ان، اما داخل زمین قطعا داستان فرق می‌کنه🔥⚡️ ⚽️ فرداشب چند تقابل نزدیک و پرریسک روی میز داریم؛ از برتری‌های نسبتاً مشخص آلمان و اتریش تا نبرد کاملاً متعادل نروژ و پرتغال. در بازی‌های ساعت ۱۹:۳۰، هلند و دانمارک دست بالاتری دارند، اما صربستان و ولز می‌توانند معادلات را تغییر دهند. در ادامه، آلمان مقابل یونان و اتریش مقابل کوزوو از نظر اعد…

👎1

26 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC≈3,790 views49 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

ری اکشن جیکوب الوردی به زیدیش کندال جنر هم سوژه شده. #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

🤣35❤9😐2👍1👎1😁1

26 Sept 2026, 20:06 UTC≈4,300 views37 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

اختلال اینترنت امشب سراسریه بچه ها هی مودم و سیمکارتتون رو انگولک نکنین که بی فایده‌ست. #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

😢26❤5👍5🤣1

26 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC≈4,300 views30 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

این جدی دیوونه‌ست تو "Obsession" نقش بازی نمیکرد خود واقعیش بود😂 #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

❤19🤣10🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 18:50 UTC≈4,530 views59 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

یه تیکه از قشنگ ترین روزهای بچگیمون کاش زندگی همونجا متوقف میشد... #RandleMcMurphy @ShakhMovies

❤50💔8👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,095 posts we hold for @ShakhMovies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ShakhMovies | شاخ موویز” (@ShakhMovies), 50,704 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShakhMovies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.