Channel
@ShaneTHazel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001804130103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShaneTHazel |
| Description | Host of #Radical / #Bitcoin B / Founder of the Brave PTSD Experience @ShaneTHazel1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 23 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShaneTHazel |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
20 posts held, back to 23 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://t.me/ShaneTHazel1
Raise your hand if you think @elonmusk should make public all the discussions & algorithms that buried #EpsteinClientList #Pedos
https://twitter.com/LPGeorgia/status/1595547082256949249?s=35
https://twitter.com/EricDJuly/status/1595536416087412738?s=35
https://twitter.com/LPTN1776/status/1595538250428428289?s=35
https://twitter.com/LPNational/status/1595530663658151962?s=35
https://twitter.com/1MarkMoss/status/1595538376887005184?s=35
The proposition of CBDCs are an admission not only that they didn’t learn a damn thing from COVID tyranny, but that they’re making an even bigger effort to control every aspect of your life thru force & coercion. #BuyBitcoin
https://twitter.com/SGBarbour/status/1595411420493283330?s=35
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1595077344133251073?s=35
https://twitter.com/ShaneTHazel/status/1583200040096759809?s=35
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShaneTHazel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ShaneTHazel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Shane Hazel” (@ShaneTHazel). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShaneTHazel.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.