Всем салам алейкум братья канал удаляется так как телеграм признан экстемитским, и размещение каналов под запретом, прошу отнестись с пониманием
💔11❤1

Channel
@Sharaf_Azerbaijan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
165subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003858550920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sharaf_Azerbaijan |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 10 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sharaf_Azerbaijan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 165 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 170 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 174 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 173 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 174 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 181 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 181 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
180 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 42.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 18.3% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 12.8% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 8.89% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sharaf_Azerbaijan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем салам алейкум братья канал удаляется так как телеграм признан экстемитским, и размещение каналов под запретом, прошу отнестись с пониманием
💔11❤1
Все материал готов осталось оформить и будет доказательная база
❤8
Всем салам алейкум, братья! Сегодня ближе к обеду мы опубликуем важный пост с источником из научной библиотеки. После нескольких лет поисков нам удалось найти письмо проклятого Степана Шаумяна, в котором, как утверждается, он писал о намеренном проведении геноцида мусульман Закавказья этот документ является весомым доказательством того, что мартовские события являлись геноцидом, а также причастности Шаумяна. Обычно…
❤🔥17🔥2👍1🙏1
Ибрагим-хан стал для Цицианова тем же, кем Муса был для фараона #история
❤11❤🔥3👍1🔥1🙏1
Хазрат Имам Аль-Хусейн (А), сказал в день Ашуры: Нет же, Аллахом клянусь, не протяну я вам руки своей для присяги, подобно презренному, и не стану я убегать от вас бегством раболепствующего труса! Источник: Аль-Иршад, 235 #религия
❤10
Вчера был день рождения Шаха Исмаила. В честь этого мы решили рассказать об одном из его самых известных подвигов. По легенде, во время одного из сражений вражеские пушки были соединены железной цепью, чтобы остановить конницу. Шах Исмаил лично бросился в атаку и одним ударом меча разрубил цепь, после чего его войско прорвало оборону противника. Согласно легенде, позже султан Селим смог завладеть этим мечом, но не…
❤13❤🔥2🔥2👏1🕊1
Салам алейкум всем хочу посоветовать канал где изучается азербайджанский язык, этот канал подойдет тем кто плохо знает азербайджанский или хочет его более детально изучить https://t.me/yourazerbaijan
❤8
#культура
❤7❤🔥2
Салам алейкум, братья! Наш подписчик обратился за помощью в наш бот @SharafAzerbaijan_bot: его данные слили и требовали деньги, угрожая распространением информации в сети. Брат написал нам с просьбой о помощи. Мы нашли данные злоумышленника, поговорили с ним — он извинился и пообещал, что не будут распространять личную информацию. Мы продолжаем следить за ситуацией».
❤🔥7👍2❤1👏1🔥1🙏1
«Среди восставших (губинское восстание) против российской власти были азербайджанцы и лезгины Ахтынского, Докузпаринского, Алтыпаринского, Тагирджальского обществ, входивших в Губинскую провинцию.» Первоисточник:Лугуев С.А., Магомедов Д.М. Дидойцы (цезы). Историко-этнографи- ческое исследование. XIX- начало XX века. Махачкала: ДНЦ РАН, 2000, с. 25-27; Материалы по истории Дагестана и Чечни. Т. III. Ч. 1. Махачкала, …
👍12❤3
Всем салам алейкум, братья! Мы расширили наш проект — теперь Sharaf Azerbaijan представлен на разных площадках. Ин ша Аллах, это только начало, и дальше будет ещё больше! Подписывайтесь на наши страницы: TikTok: @sharaf_azerbaijan_ Instagram: @sharaf_azerbaijan YouTube: @SharafAzerbaijan Спасибо каждому, кто поддерживает наш проект. Пусть Аллах даст нам успеха и пользы в этом деле.
🔥8❤2
«Вчера в чате был человек, который пытался разжечь фитну между двумя братскими народами — азербайджанцами и талышами. На самом деле талыши — это народ, наиболее близкий азербайджанцам в культурном отношении. Как отмечается в монографии Гамаршаха Джавадова "Талыши" (2004 г.): "Общая историческая судьба, общенациональные традиции и обычаи, бытовая и культурная общность — все это связывает талышей с азербайджанцами.…
❤9❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Sharaf_Azerbaijan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Sharaf_Azerbaijan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sharaf Azerbaijan” (@Sharaf_Azerbaijan), 165 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sharaf_Azerbaijan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.