Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shardonney

Channel

Shardonney

@ShardonneyFam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

637subscribers

-127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001592885468
TypeChannel
Username@ShardonneyFam
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShardonneyFam

Growth

6378197286 August 2026 — 764 subscribers6 August 2026 — 764 subscribers6 August 2026 — 762 subscribers14 August 2026 — 755 subscribers21 August 2026 — 819 subscribers28 August 2026 — 715 subscribers6 September 2026 — 637 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 31 days, net -127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 610–846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 07:36637-78
28 Aug 2026, 10:11715-104
21 Aug 2026, 03:12819+64
14 Aug 2026, 23:55755-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:35762-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:50764no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:38764first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52446703442324767781047.6%
custom 5244738982104831224419.0%
custom 5251485585452872606314.3%
custom 524690661344441858629.52%
custom 524697026915471054929.52%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026

5 в заявках закину подарки 🪦 Залетайте там сидят красотки

6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌺 Lamer — чат для общения от семей и архивов Возьмем кн в папку 300+ @F0rkbot

6 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔤ssociations by us⭐⭐⭐ Точку в комм, рп 0/10⭐⭐⭐⭐🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 52446703442324767781

Signed 2Miggers

6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩Всем хорошего дня! На рп

custom 52446703442324767782

6 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Если бы вы отправились в путешествие без возможности вернуться, куда бы полетели? А — На другую планету Б — В далёкое прошлое В — В будущее Г — В параллельную вселенную

custom 52446703442324767781

6 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Какую профессию вы бы попробовали, если бы точно знали, что у вас всё получится? А — Космонавт Б — Археолог В — Детектив Г — Учёный

custom 52446703442324767781

6 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Если бы вы могли сохранить только одно воспоминание на всю жизнь, что бы это было? А — Самый счастливый день Б — Первая любовь В — Семейный момент Г — Самое яркое путешествие

custom 52446703442324767781

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Какую тайну вы бы хотели раскрыть? А — Бермудский треугольник Б — Атлантида В — Тайна пирамид Г — Что находится за пределами Вселенной

custom 52514855854528726061

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Если бы вам дали возможность создать новую планету, какой она была бы? А — Полностью покрыта океаном Б — Вечная весна В — Два солнца Г — Летающие острова

custom 52446703442324767781

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Если бы можно было задать Вселенной только один вопрос, что бы вы выбрали? А — Есть ли другая разумная жизнь? Б — Как появилось всё? В — Что ждёт человечество? Г — В чём смысл жизни?

custom 52514855854528726061

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShardonneyFam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shardonney” (@ShardonneyFam), 637 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShardonneyFam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.