Channel
@Shellys_Terrible_Revenge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
301subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002410687236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Shellys_Terrible_Revenge |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Shellys_Terrible_Revenge |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 301 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 305 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 305 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
29 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 20.7% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 6.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приве!! Я Милки Вэй (вы можете знать меня как Ремари) Диза передала мне эту новеллу, так что теперь я новый влд Я искренне обожаю штр, так что надеюсь, что я смогу вытащить новеллу со дна Ща сделаю набор ໒꒰ྀི๑ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ๑꒱ྀིა
🍓4💘2
Signed Мишко Фредде🙃 #чебурек #Динозаврек #МойМужХомякВалера #ФредвалерыКанон
Я бомж соре
Signed Мишко Фредде🙃 #чебурек #Динозаврек #МойМужХомякВалера #ФредвалерыКанон
Лажно шучу беслпатно❤️
Signed Ი𐑼 ꠹ 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 #𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧!!!. ᰔ
Новеллу сьест мilki вei я ее продаю за 11 робу ксов
Signed Ი𐑼 ꠹ 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 #𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧!!!. ᰔ
H
🍾3
Signed Ი𐑼 ꠹ 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 #𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧!!!. ᰔ
Всем привет. Я думаю это было давно очевидно, что новелла уже врядли когда либо выйдет. На самом деле мне искренне жалко, что так вышло, да...... Этот проект познакомил меня с тверси, и хоть мы сейчас намного меньше общаемся , с ней правда было комфортно и в то время она была моей лучшей подругой. и с другими людьми, и с одним из них я по сей день общаюсь ;3 Я давно хотела уйти из фд мира денди на самом деле, но нов…
😢7
Signed 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 ♯𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧 . • ` , . °
#вп
Signed 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 ♯𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧 . • ` , . °
Бля вообще кто нибудь из русских знает о Toon Turf!? Мне срочно нужен кф по нему! Очень хочется обсудить с кем-то Toon Turf… 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ *ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В TOON TURF CONF (RUS) Здесь вас ждёт контент, а также иногда и офицальная информация от создателей TOON TURF на русском языке! ВП :*тык ПРЕДЛОЖКА : *тык
Signed 𝘋𝘪𝘻𝘢 ♯𝙍𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙮_𝙆𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙧 . • ` , . °
Video, posted without a caption
💘4
Мы ыче умокм
🍓3💊2🕊1
Signed Диза #Riggy_kisser
Накидайте впшек под пост😂😂 типа д
🕊3
Signed Ладно диза
#вп
Signed диза умерли
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Shellys_Terrible_Revenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,414,050 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Shellys_Terrible_Revenge named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ѕhׁׅ֮ꫀׁׅᥣᥣу 𝗍ᥱrrіᑲᥣᥱ ɾҽѵҽղցҽ // щitпостi много щitпosti” (@Shellys_Terrible_Revenge), 301 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shellys_Terrible_Revenge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.