Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шоппинг Ниндзя

Channel

Шоппинг Ниндзя

@ShoppingNinjaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,502subscribers

-83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625368099
TypeChannel
Username@ShoppingNinjaa
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShoppingNinjaa

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,49715,58515,5417 August 2026 — 15,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,581 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,577 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,553 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,551 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,539 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,534 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,523 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,519 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,516 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,505 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,525 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,534 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,527 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,520 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,523 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,524 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,539 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,554 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,567 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,539 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,527 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,520 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,522 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,513 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,501 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,497 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,502 subscribers15,5027 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,484–15,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:2015,502+5
8 Sept 2026, 03:3815,497-4
4 Sept 2026, 21:3815,501-12
3 Sept 2026, 04:3915,513-9
1 Sept 2026, 23:3415,522+2
1 Sept 2026, 02:2615,520-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:5615,527-12
30 Aug 2026, 01:1515,539-28
29 Aug 2026, 00:0415,567+13
28 Aug 2026, 01:0415,554+15
27 Aug 2026, 03:1315,539+15
26 Aug 2026, 02:2515,524+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:0615,523+3
24 Aug 2026, 04:1615,520-7
22 Aug 2026, 10:1315,527-7
21 Aug 2026, 00:5315,534+9
19 Aug 2026, 23:0915,525+20
18 Aug 2026, 21:4615,505-11
17 Aug 2026, 19:2915,516-3
16 Aug 2026, 19:0415,519first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.41%
avg views ÷ 15,502 subscribers
Avg views / post
839
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held68 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total45,295
Reactions total1,709
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 50s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,163 reactions across 66 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,10150.9%
🔥57526.6%
😍1928.88%
🥰1406.47%
👍431.99%
😱311.43%
🍓200.925%
😭130.601%
😁120.555%
💔100.462%
💯80.37%
👌60.277%
🙏50.231%
👻40.185%
🦄20.092%
🥴10.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC348 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Барселона за 1 день моими глазами❤️ Конечно же мне не хватило этого замечательного города. Значит, нужно будет ехать ещё 😍 Я здесь была 10 лет назад и в этот раз взглянула на него совершенно по-другому : идеальная погода, расслабленная атмосфера, вкусная еда, красота вокруг и немного шопинга Идеальное комбо для меня PS. Кстати, с шопингом не особо разгуляешься, магазинов мало, ассортимент небольшой Но в любом слу

🔥15😍12🥰4

2 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC704 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Даже не знаю, от чего я больше не могу оторвать глаз: от прекрасной Марины в самом волшебном положении, ее Мейка , аутфита или каффы на гендер пати 🥹 Все очень стильно и красиво И что может быть милее такого события 💔

12😍3🥰2

2 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC786 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Маленькое напоминание о том, как Важно заглядывать в мужские показы 😍❤️

🔥17😍7😭2

1 Sept 2026, 22:51 UTC923 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Тук тук, ночное включение к вам из Барселоны ❤️ Не могу не поделиться своим сегодняшним днем Я летела на концерт The Weekend, билеты были куплены год!! Назад Собирались большой компанией, но в итоге из всех осталась я одна и решила не отменять свои приключения 😆 Кто бы знал, что будет дальше … Ночью я летела до Баку, а когда приземлилась стало понятно, что самолет очень сильно опоздал и мой следующий рейс уже ул

😱31🔥22😭11

1 Sept 2026, 17:19 UTC855 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Ещё одни Трендовые сочетания на эту осень 🍂 Какой вариант Вам понравился больше?❤️

30🔥13😍3

1 Sept 2026, 05:54 UTC985 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Главные тренды осени’26 🍂 Если не хочется покупать новый гардероб целиком, а хочется добавить несколько действительно актуальных вещей — сохраняйте: 1. Узкие силуэты : После нескольких лет oversize возвращаемся к более собранным силуэтам. Но главный принцип — баланс. Узкий пиджак носим с прямыми или чуть широкими брюками либо юбкой А-силуэта. Узкие брюки — с джемпером, который уже не oversize, а просто оставляет не

21🔥6💯4

31 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC974 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Какие тренды я не куплю на эту осень?🍂 Рассказала в видео ❤️

27🥰5😍3

31 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC836 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня #ниндзялук в пижамном стиле ❤️ Провожаем последний день лета комфортно

14😍4🔥3

31 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC827 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

САМЫЕ ИНТЕРЕСНЫЕ НОВОСТИ ИЗ МИРА МОДЫ❤️ По традиции, начинаем новую неделю с самых интересных новостей индустрии Всем прекрасного дня!

16🔥4😍3

30 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC694 views38 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @chubabrandPhoto

Татьяна, автор телеграм-канал «Шоппинг ниндзя», и её дочь в парных луках. На Татьяне тренч Ethereal — бестселлер Chuba. Именно с этой вещи началась дружба бренда с Татьяной ♡

20🔥11👍7

30 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC703 views13 reactionsread 31 August 2026

😍❤️🤍🤍 Ну этот тренч моя любовь на веки, конечно Представляю , как в нем будет щеголять Лизик, когда вырастет🥹👇🏻

13

29 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC900 views83 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня моему сыночку 2 года ❤️ Наш Павлуша , самый добрый, нежный и удивительный мальчик Мой островок спокойствия и силы одновременно Время летит очень быстро! И с детишками это особенно чувствуется Ровно два года назад мы с мужем прошли очень тяжелый процесс родов и я только сейчас начинаю осознавать, как же это было страшно Но самое главное, это наш сын Самый любимый и желанный Лучший братик! Такой маленький,

63💔10😍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @ShoppingNinjaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GLAMORAMA
@glamoramablog · 28,929
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Dresses
@dresses · 50,565
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
kate.katkova
@katekatkova · 75,550
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Модный маркетолог
@moda_marketingg · 31,444
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Incognitio Scientia Скрытое знание (без теории заговоров)
@ilincognitio · 30,320
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
Azalia L/ stylist
@azalial · 42,564
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
Купи, молись, люби
@buy_pray_love · 46,149
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
Мода быть собой
@welcometoyourselfff · 33,793
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шоппинг Ниндзя” (@ShoppingNinjaa), 15,502 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShoppingNinjaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.