Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шугаева

Channel

Шугаева

@ShugaevaNauka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,077subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297530292
TypeChannel
Username@ShugaevaNauka
DescriptionМы. Наука. И не только😉 Канал зарегистрирован в РКН № 6444938258
Created10 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShugaevaNauka

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0778,1528,114.56 August 2026 — 8,152 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,152 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,149 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,141 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,132 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,128 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,121 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,122 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,117 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,141 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,136 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,124 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,125 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,116 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,101 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,107 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,098 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,093 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,091 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,092 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,089 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,084 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,081 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,078 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,077 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,066–8,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 08:398,077-1
4 Nov 2026, 04:508,078-3
1 Nov 2026, 15:118,081-3
29 Oct 2026, 19:508,084-5
27 Oct 2026, 01:588,089-3
24 Oct 2026, 07:178,092+1
20 Oct 2026, 22:488,091-2
17 Oct 2026, 14:078,093-5
14 Oct 2026, 20:398,098-9
5 Oct 2026, 05:188,107+6
26 Sept 2026, 12:418,101-15
17 Sept 2026, 06:568,116-9
13 Sept 2026, 10:588,125+1
9 Sept 2026, 11:178,124-12
4 Sept 2026, 11:558,136-5
31 Aug 2026, 13:138,141+24
28 Aug 2026, 10:448,117-5
25 Aug 2026, 20:078,122+1
23 Aug 2026, 02:128,121-7
19 Aug 2026, 12:568,128first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 8,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
506
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held42 (8 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,090
Reactions total270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,490
Videos
≈941
Links
≈1,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 16s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

659 reactions across 39 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤42364.2%
👍15323.2%
🔥446.68%
👏142.12%
🤔91.37%
🥰81.21%
❤‍🔥40.607%
👎20.303%
😢20.303%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ShugaevaNauka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC246 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Треть россиян обоих полов признались, что плакали из-за критики на работе Здесь есть две стороны. Сам сотрудник, не умеющий принимать конструктивные замечания, которые способствуют исправлению недочетов. Я таких сотрудников не понимаю, бывает, что сама прошу второе мнение, потому что «глаз замыливается», и даже неприятные характеристики идут на пользу итоговому результату. Так может происходить и на работе, и скажем…

👍8

3 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC298 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Тихий Дон» «– Ты гляди, как народ разделили, гады! Будто с плугом проехались: один – в одну сторону, другой – в другую, как под лемешом. Чертова жизня, и время страшное! Один другого уж не угадывает…» Пока мужики воевали и искали себя, бабы страдали, пахали, любили, голодали, умирали, хоронили… Но любили! Любили! ЛЮБИЛИ! Той русской собачьей дурнопьяной любовью, что хоть дух вон! Какой роскошный получился спектак…

❤12❤‍🔥4👏1

2 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC343 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Одинокие люди поделились с социологами преимуществами и сложностями жизни без семьи В качестве главных плюсов называют тишину и возможность жить по своему расписанию. А грустно одиноким, когда нужно платить ипотеку, делать ремонт и болеть. Жизнь в одиночестве кажется проще, но не ясно, зачем она? Выскажу свое мнение: «Эта мнимая простота — путь слабых. Конечно, семья — это ежедневный труд. Но какое же это счастье,…

❤17

30 Oct 2026, 18:11 UTC443 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💪🏻 Они давно знакомы, вместе ездили на фронт и не раз оказывались в нестандартных ситуациях. У меня в студии самый харизматичный военкор Семён Пегов и командир разведывательно‑штурмовой бригады «Святой Георгий» Александр Бородай. Выпуск «Время своих» ✅ Смотреть здесь #ЛучшаяНаСветеРабота

👍8❤4🔥4👏1

29 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC454 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Москвичи чаще всего читают книги-ужастики. Также любят пощекотать нервы жители Екатеринбурга, Новосибирска, Краснодара и Красноярска. В лидерах продаж — корифей Стивен Кинг. Сериалы здесь двигатель книготорговли. «Кэрри» на экранах привела людей в книжные. Но в этом жанре есть и наши авторы, которые могут нагнать жути. Я сама иногда на пару ночей «залипаю». Рекомендую «Лес» Светланы Тюльбашевой. Москвичи на природе…

❤5👏1🤔1

27 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC506 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Эта дама из Южной Африки меньше чем за пару лет сгенерировала почти 400 книг с помощью ЫЫ. Заработала она на этом стартапе миллион долларов! Дама провела серьёзную исследовательскую работу, чтобы изучить, чего хочет аудитория и попасть в запрос. Дальше — дело современных технологий. Что делать нам-ретроградам? Наверное, скоро придётся читать только тех, кого знаешь лично, и под гарантии человеческого происхождения …

❤9👍4🤔2

26 Oct 2026, 20:42 UTC487 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Москва, такая Москва — Большой, Луна и старенький Иж 💙☺️

❤16

23 Oct 2026, 13:49 UTC578 views22 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

За два года число путешественников, выбирающих знакомые отели, увеличилось почти на 4% и стремится к 1/5 всех туристов. Специалисты объясняют такой выбор тягой к снижению когнитивной нагрузки. Но ведь именно новые впечатления и задачи развивают наш мозг! Конечно, у меня тоже есть любимые места и города, но отправляясь в отпуск, предлагаю не заселяться в привычную, как старое кресло, гостиницу.😜 А выбрать новую! Не…

❤17👏5

22 Oct 2026, 11:03 UTC525 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Наш гений🙏🏻❤️ Наш народный. И такой разный. Вчера на «Матросской тишине» я снова проплакала весь спектакль. Чем больше смотрю, тем сильнее разрывается сердце. #Табакерка #Современник

❤15🥰8👏3

19 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTC618 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Любители бодибилдинга создали дефицит на рынке препаратов для мужчин, у которых проблемы с либидо.😔 Завсегдатаи качалок «съели» почти весь тестостерон на рынке. Пациентам с гормональными нарушениями стало сложнее найти лекарства. Кстати, кроме прочего, тренировки с «железом» сами по себе могут позитивно влиять на уровень тестостерона. Но (!) почему бы России не производить его в достаточных объемах? Глядишь и с дем…

👍6🤔2

16 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC670 views24 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Пишут, что вес средней порции готовой еды сократился за год на 10%. Бизнес экономит, чтобы держать цены. Тенденция касается как основных блюд, так и перекусов. При всех сложностях, готовая еда остается самой быстрорастущей категорией в сегменте продуктов питания. Ну и хорошо, ищем плюсы: меньше ешь — дольше живешь! А сендвичи и хот-доги из «меню перекусов» давно пора заменить на яблоки, гречку, куриную грудку. Дом…

👍16❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @ShugaevaNauka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ShugaevaNauka edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Опасаетесь, что машины нас поработят?

  1. Нет, человек всегда будет хитрее31%
  2. Да, они уже…9%
  3. Да, это неизбежное будущее25%
  4. Будем жить дружно с роботами и ИИ34%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юлия Барановская
@ybaranovskaya_tv · 46,089
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
PolinaKitsenko
@Polina_Kitsenko · 106,211
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шугаева” (@ShugaevaNauka), 8,077 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShugaevaNauka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.