Channel
@SidLukkassen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,103subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001467724835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SidLukkassen |
| Created | 6 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SidLukkassen |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 1,103 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 1,106 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 1,109 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 1,111 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 1,112 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 1,117 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,113 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 1,112 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 1,111 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 1,112 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 1,114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 1,114 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 81.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Stukje uit ZIN IN CHAOS: Met andere woorden: ik ben een ijverig persoon, iemand die dingen aanpakt en regelt, desnoods leef ik wat zuiniger en slaap ik wat korter. Toch heb ik het te schaften met een maatschappij waarin boomers alle maakindustrie naar Azië hebben gestuurd en nu de rest opzadelen met flexbaantjes. Zij dragen ons geld over aan de EU, deden zelf niets aan compliance en dwingen nu iedereen om elk dubbel…
👍3
Voice message, posted without a caption
Moge dit NOOIT NOOIT NOOIT NOOIT verloren gaan: https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/detail?id=2019Z08262&did=2019D16774 In de annalen van de vaderlandse parlementaire geschiedenis, blijvend opgenomen.
Aanloop naar het grote en totale 'er klaar mee zijn': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxt1Lb7i70c&t=5228s
Zojuist herlezen als deel van mijn onderzoek voor 'Zin in Chaos'. Dit artikel, gepubliceerd in 2019, heeft absoluut eeuwigheidswaarde. Depressie is inherent aan een cultuur van "be nice to everyone, but beat out the competition". Lees: https://doorbraak.be/depressief-zijn-blijft-nog-wel-even-taboe
Voor mij is Nederland te links geworden dus ik zie er voor mezelf geen economische toekomst meer, maar ik kan nog wel uitleggen wat de weg voorwaarts is en dit is tegelijk een duiding van LinkedIn als relevant platform.
👍2
C.S. Lewis stelt: de mens heeft dorst, dus is er water om te drinken; de mens hunkert naast intimiteit, en dus is er seks. De mens verlangt ook naar transcendentie, en dus moet God wel bestaan, omdat dit verlangen naar Hem verwijst. Doctor Sid doorgrondt dit argument vanuit realisme. Lees het nu! https://denieuwezuil.nl/de-allegorie-van-seks-en-dorst/
Als onverenigbare principes tegenover elkaar staan, gegeven schaarse middelen, is escalatie onvermijdelijk.
John Smith Thang invited me to his podcast: a discussion on "How come the EU is taken over by bureaucrats who destroy the country? How can Christians let this happen?" https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RYKo_oVu-TAd
❤1
Hierbij bedankt ik de donateurs en iedereen die heeft bijgedragen aan de crowdfunding van 'Zin in Chaos'. Jongens - wat een achtbaanrit! Beluister mijn bespiegelingen en overwegingen bij de voortgang van het project. https://youtu.be/SXtG2W_0aN4
We hebben nog maar 6 uur en er ontbreekt nog slechts € 1.500 om ‘Zin in Chaos’ mogelijk te maken. We zijn zó dichtbij. Na alle steun, alle gedeelde berichten en alle energie van de afgelopen weken mag dit project nu niet vlak voor de finish stranden. Daarom doen we één laatste oproep: iedere bijdrage telt nu. Ook een kleiner bedrag brengt ons dichter bij het doel. Kun je zelf niet bijdragen? Deel dan alsjeblieft de…
We hebben nog maar 14 uur en zijn zó dicht bij het doel. Na alle tijd, energie en steun van de afgelopen weken mag ‘Zin in Chaos’ nu niet vlak voor de finish alsnog mislukken. Met iedere bijdrage komen we dichterbij. Maar ook als je zelf niet kunt bijdragen, kun je enorm helpen door de link te delen. Stuur hem door naar vrienden, familie, collega’s en iedereen die mogelijk geïnteresseerd is. Delen, delen, delen – j…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SidLukkassen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Sid kanaal” (@SidLukkassen), 1,103 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SidLukkassen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.