Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᥡ 𝙤 𝐮 𝒓 𝐬 ҽ ʟ 𝒻 .

Channel

ᥡ 𝙤 𝐮 𝒓 𝐬 ҽ ʟ 𝒻 .

@SillyBilly_DSFN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003123758752
TypeChannel
Username@SillyBilly_DSFN
Created9 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SillyBilly_DSFN

Growth

810911 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8 subscribers11 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 03:288-2
18 Aug 2026, 00:0810+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:169no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:209first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 9 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53977930579805654811028.6%
custom 54699686863097282911028.6%
custom 5310044294847946806822.9%
custom 5435968196186244179720.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC12 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👤 уOʊя𝙨𝖊𝕝𝚏 typing.. — Ох, Как т0нко расπи¢ано.. R д@же п0чти ₽астр0гался.🤩 Н0 ты не ¥чл@ маа@аленькYю д3таль. Д@, мож3т быть м0нсmры и прRчут¢я за симв0лами. М0жет один0kие и из0бр@жают из себя ¢тр@шил. Но Зе₽кал0 то///е может св3тить. πусть криво, пусmь €то и 0тр@женныN свет. ЕслN мне на сам0м д3ле не cт₽ашн0? €сли R πросто е¢ть? Без эт0го цирk@, как ты πр3дполаг@ешь?🤩 R пр3дупр€жд@ю, пот0му чт0 хочу бы

custom 53100442948479468064custom 54359681961862441793

27 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC15 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👤 уOʊя𝙨𝖊𝕝𝚏 typing.. — Странные тут какие-то людишки. Серьезно можно поверить, что тут все так радужно?

custom 53100442948479468064custom 54359681961862441794

27 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👤 уOʊя𝙨𝖊𝕝𝚏 typing.. — з@был отkрыть обсYждени3... тепe₱ь точн0 пок@🙄

custom 53977930579805654813custom 54699686863097282913

27 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC16 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👤 уOʊя𝙨𝖊𝕝𝚏 typing.. — Т@кс, вроде работа3т. Чт0 ж, Прив€т взр0слые и р3бятишки!🌪 М0е имя <<€rr0r>>. Но мо///но про¢то 🌟илл. Виж¥, что ты - чел0век либо 0ч3нb глупый, либ0 очень см3лый, раз €то чит@ешь... ¢разу пойдет предупреж🌟ение, чтобы потом не было нытья : 🌟🌟🌟 0ст@юtся тольк0 т3, кт0 не бо№тся м0их пр^вил и н3 любит в₽ать. П0т0мY чт0 R чYв¢твYю.🤩 Да л@дн0 ва🌟, если пл0хо от одних мо№х ошиб0к, тоже у

custom 53977930579805654813custom 54699686863097282913

27 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.....

custom 53977930579805654812custom 54699686863097282912

27 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖🌟... 🥳🌟🖤 🔤🎀🌟☁️✨🌟 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 tw: blo0d & 0rgans. 🤩Ты попал в могилу Билла (YoUrself)... Точнее в мой блог.🫗 👿...Ознакомься с правилами... Иначе...🌟 нет, ты просто получишь бан. (это не точно 😁) 😇Написать мне что-то? Хаа, ну давай, давай.🩸 💟Остальные в этой ловушке. ...Ооо, подарок? Смелый поступок.🔥 #rp #dial #dialXrp

custom 53977930579805654812custom 54699686863097282912

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @SillyBilly_DSFN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,479,934 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᥡ 𝙤 𝐮 𝒓 𝐬 ҽ ʟ 𝒻 .” (@SillyBilly_DSFN), 8 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SillyBilly_DSFN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.