It's Führer Friday o/ @SilverStackerSS

Channel
⚡Silver Stackers⚡
@SilverStackersSS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
718subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001851195110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SilverStackersSS |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SilverStackersSS |
Topic
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 718 | +5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 713 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 714 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 710 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 708 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 709 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 710 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
327 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 48 | 14.7% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5363998558783547460 | 30 | 9.17% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 7.95% | |
| custom 5352994169671392842 | 25 | 7.65% | |
| custom 5312036249140210847 | 24 | 7.34% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 7.03% | |
| 👌 | 21 | 6.42% | |
| custom 5109758326179104515 | 20 | 6.12% | |
| 🏆 | 18 | 5.50% | |
| 🫡 | 16 | 4.89% | |
| custom 5276417376684876543 | 7 | 2.14% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 2.14% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.14% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| custom 5107379287959275210 | 3 | 0.917% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 0.917% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.306% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🏆7👌4🙏1
For my fellow beardies. My new sterling silver beard comb
🔥15custom 53120362491402108477⚡4🏆3🙏1
Gold has found strong support around $4,000 and is now looking to break to the upside from a 6 month long bull flag. We still need to confirm this breakout with a couple trading sessions above the descending line, and then retake both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages to signal a resumption of the bull run. Long-term nothing has changed, monetary debasement is accelerating, war is burning through limited resou…
🔥11custom 53120362491402108477⚡2🙏1
Below spot for anyone interested. White men only https://bullionexchanges.com/1-oz-bullion-exchanges-silver-round-999-fine
⚡6custom 53120362491402108474❤3🙏1
TL:DR, Stack Silver ☝️🏻
😁15🫡4🗿3🙏1
This chart comparing fed funds with treasury yields has several key takeaways: 1) SilverStackers has long stated that the fed rate follows the 2-year, which is true; but the fed rate exactly leg humps the 3-month, and always makes adjustments after the fact instead of leading the way, so the fed is a LARPer that just does what the market is already doing and then says a bunch of tarded stuff at their meetings for no…
👌7custom 52764173766848765437custom 51097583261791045153✍2🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53120362491402108474🏆3👌2🕊2🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡7🏆2🙏2
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 536399855878354746011🫡8custom 53529941696713928424🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁13💯7🍌4🙏2
It's Führer Friday o/ @SilverStackerSS
custom 53639985587835474609custom 53529941696713928424❤2🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SilverStackersSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SilverStackersSS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡Silver Stackers⚡” (@SilverStackersSS), 718 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SilverStackersSS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.