Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Singular Thinker

Channel

Singular Thinker

@SingularThinker

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,254subscribers

+75 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641861941
TypeChannel
Username@SingularThinker
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SingularThinker

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1761,2541,2158 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,176 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,211 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,215 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,227 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,243 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,246 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,254 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 38 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,164–1,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 15:011,254+8
11 Sept 2026, 15:571,246+3
7 Sept 2026, 06:561,243+16
2 Sept 2026, 12:141,227+12
30 Aug 2026, 05:371,215+4
27 Aug 2026, 03:321,211+20
24 Aug 2026, 01:521,191+1
20 Aug 2026, 16:441,190+4
17 Aug 2026, 19:591,186-1
15 Aug 2026, 02:161,187+9
12 Aug 2026, 04:181,178+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:381,176-3
8 Aug 2026, 18:451,179no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:321,179first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8862.0%
🔥2215.5%
💩128.45%
🤣96.34%
🤓74.93%
👻21.41%
👍10.704%
🤷‍♂10.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC309 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

نیم ساعت دیگه اولین جلسه مون رو شروع میکنیم. لینک جلسه رو تو سایت و کامنت همین پست میتونید بگید. اگه هنوز به دوستاتون نگفتید بهترین موقع است.

🔥8

1 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC397 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بات ها هم قوی شدن :))) به زبون خودمون باهامون حرف میزنن

🤓7🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC578 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چیز حقی شد. خدایی بفرست برای دوستای گربه‌بازت :))

🔥91

31 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC554 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

خب مهدی عزیز زحمت کشید و پوستر و لوگوی قابل توجهی رو طراحی کرد که آدم روش میشه راحت بفرسته این ور و اون ور. لوگومون هم یه میم معروفه که در تصویر مشاهده میکنید.

14

31 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC703 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐈‍⬛️ Learning Theory Circle — Session 1 We're starting a biweekly reading group on the theory of deep learning. Every other Sunday, one person presents one paper — their own work or someone else's — followed by open discussion. 🗓 Sunday, Aug 2 · 7:00 PM (Tehran, UTC+3:30) 🎤 Erfan Sobhaei — Sharif University of Technology 📄 "A Modern Take on the Bias–Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networks" Why start here: the textb

10

26 Jul 2026, 22:19 UTC662 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اینم ویدئوی یوتیوبش: https://youtu.be/ZG5iv-kHQx8?si=xwuGeokmoxh3omJf تو گول درایو همون فولدر قبلی هم آپلود کردم: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SoyOV7xvZm1kUzEvK5etK_328vLHeB6n?usp=sharing اگه دوست دارید که بفهمید در دنیای learning theory چه خبره یا دقیقترش تعمیم پذیری یا generalization چی چی هست میتونید که یکی دو جلسه اول این فیلما رو نگاه کنید و یا برای دوست علاقه مندتون بفرستید. @SingularThinker

5💩2

26 Jul 2026, 22:16 UTC572 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

اینم کل این ۶ جلسه اسلایدها یکجا به همراه مخلفات و چیزایی که نوشتیم سر کلاس. به قول فرنگی ها annotated slides.

6💩2🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC504 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

این هم اسلاید جلسه ۶ و آخر. قصه ما به سر رسید

7💩2

25 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC649 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

جدیدا متوجه شدم دستامو ازم بگیرن نمیتونم صحبت کنم :))) سندرم ایتالیا

🤣9👻2💩1

25 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC543 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الوعده وفا آقا من کل ویدئوهای پنج جلسه قبل رو هم روی گوگل درایو و هم روی یوتیوب آپلود کردم. این پلی لیست ویدئوها در یوتیوب: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI7kOanYUFQw&si=P45ZqSWO5qJXQdFz این فولدر مراجعه در گوگل درایو هستش: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SoyOV7xvZm1kUzEvK5etK_328vLHeB6n?usp=sharing @SingularThinker

18💩1

25 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC733 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

این اسلایدها تا آخر جلسه ۵.

10💩2

25 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC542 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

این نکته درستیه متاسفانه. طبیعی هم هست. ولی خب نشدنی هم نیست. ما هم زورمونو میزنیم به هر حال. شما هم اگه پایه اید که بهمون ملحق بشید. برای فعلا شروع کار من اسلاید جلسات تا اینجا رو میذارم تا بعد برم سراغ فیلماش. یه گروه هم زدم واسه کسایی که تو جلسات شرکت کردن و فعال بودن اگه میومدید جلسات رو یا رفتید و خوندید مطالبو بهم خبر بدید که اضافه تون کنم.

6💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SingularThinker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

American_English_File Books
@houshang_academy_american · 37,430
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr Behzad Chavooshi
@drbehzadchavooshi · 54,820
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
آیلتس تافل/ IELTS
@ielts_990 · 45,351
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
ADHD FARSI | روانشناسی
@adhdbefarsi · 23,035
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
دکترانوشه دکتر انوشه
@anoosheh_ir · 31,124
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
پیشنهادهایی برای #اپلای #applyabroad
@safarnamee7 · 33,538
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Singular Thinker” (@SingularThinker), 1,254 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SingularThinker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.