Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мир Эфириума

Channel

Мир Эфириума

@SmartCurrencyTrends

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,453subscribers

-741 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003583833210
TypeChannel
Username@SmartCurrencyTrends
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SmartCurrencyTrends

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

12.6 average views per post against 16,453 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.077%. Across the 24,284 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.53% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (9 August 2026 8 September 2026)
Posts measured33 of 33 published in the window (33 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled416
Mature posts only0.1% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers16,453 measured 7 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 24,284 channels · p10 2.82% · p25 5.53% · p50 11.2% · p75 21.9% · p90 39.5%
Position in cohort0.148th percentile · 1/143 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.175% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 8 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,45317,19416,823.57 August 2026 — 17,194 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,194 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,174 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,160 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,125 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,093 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,075 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,037 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,011 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,978 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,955 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,922 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,904 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,870 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,826 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,784 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,754 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,725 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,653 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,632 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,621 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,593 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,578 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,566 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,518 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,453 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -741. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,342–17,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:1916,453-65
4 Sept 2026, 18:4016,518-48
3 Sept 2026, 02:3816,566-12
2 Sept 2026, 03:2816,578-15
1 Sept 2026, 03:0416,593-28
30 Aug 2026, 23:4316,621-11
30 Aug 2026, 03:1216,632-21
29 Aug 2026, 00:3716,653-21
27 Aug 2026, 21:5316,674-22
26 Aug 2026, 21:3616,696-29
25 Aug 2026, 23:2516,725-29
25 Aug 2026, 02:1316,754-30
23 Aug 2026, 17:0516,784-42
22 Aug 2026, 00:0816,826-44
20 Aug 2026, 16:3616,870-34
19 Aug 2026, 14:2416,904-18
18 Aug 2026, 16:0416,922-33
17 Aug 2026, 12:3316,955-23
16 Aug 2026, 06:0616,978-33
14 Aug 2026, 15:0517,011first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.077%
avg views ÷ 16,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.6
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
33
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held55 (17 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total416
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC6 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥 Топ-3 причины держать Ethereum в 2026: реализм или иллюзия? Ты подозреваешь, что вокруг всех этих обещаний скрыты важные детали. Давай посмотрим правде в глаза: 1) Развитие Web3: Это может быть заманчивым, но кто сказал, что это надежно? 2) Рост DeFi: Сфера полна энтузиастов, но за каждым успехом прячутся риски, о которых не говорят. 3) Массовое внедрение блокчейна: Кажется, это путь в будущее, но ты готов к тому,

1 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC8 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Добро пожаловать в мир Ethereum! Ты, конечно, слышал многообещающие истории о криптовалюте. Но давай говорить откровенно: насколько это на самом деле реально? Часто нас охватывает оптимизм, не замечая, как за этими мечтами могут скрываться подводные камни. Это не просто игра на повышение, а реальный риск, который может обернуться серьезными потерями. Где твой план, если всё пойдёт не так? Задавай вопросы, проверяй

31 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC13 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Ethereum снова показывает силу, но давай не торопиться! Ты замечаешь, что ETH удерживает ключевые уровни поддержки. Но давай будем честными: насколько это действительно обнадеживает? Рынок всегда подвержен флуктуациям, и каждое новое предсказание о росте может оказаться всего лишь иллюзией. Ты готов к тому, что вдруг вновь столкнешься с неожиданностями? Где твой план, если всё пойдет не так? Поделись своими мыслям

30 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC16 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Ethereum: Путь к новым вершинам или очередные иллюзии? Ты видишь, как ETH удерживает ключевые уровни поддержки, и вокруг растет оптимизм о новом ATH. Но давай будем честными: на сколько надежны эти ожидания? Каждый раз, когда рынок показывает силу, важно помнить, что за блестящей картинкой могут скрываться серьезные риски. Готов ли ты к неожиданностям? Возможно, пришло время задуматься, где твой план, если ситуация

29 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC13 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Топ-3 причины держать Ethereum в 2026: реализм или иллюзия? Ты слышал об обещаниях, связанных с развитием Web3, ростом DeFi и массовым внедрением блокчейна. Но давай будем честными: насколько эти факторы действительно надежны? - Развитие Web3: Это звучит многообещающе, но ты готов к разочарованиям, если ожидания не сбудутся? - Рост DeFi: Эта сфера полна недоразумений и рисков, не дайте себя обмануть. - Массовое вне

28 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC11 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Ethereum снова показывает силу, но не спеши радоваться! ETH кажется стабильным, но давай будем откровенны: насколько надежен этот рост? Все говорят о новом ATH, но что, если это всего лишь иллюзия? Рынок криптовалют непредсказуем, и за каждым оптимистичным прогнозом прячутся риски, о которых не стоит забывать. Ты готов к тому, что всё может пойти не так, как планировалось? Где твой план? Не дайте себя обмануть мыл

27 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC8 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥 Топ-3 причины держать Ethereum в 2026? Ты, наверное, слышал о развитии Web3, росте DeFi и массовом внедрении блокчейна. Но стоит задуматься: насколько эти обещания надежны? 1) Развитие Web3: Звучит заманчиво, но реальность может оказаться совершенно иной. 2) Рост DeFi: Возможно, здесь многообещающие перспективы, но риски тоже не спят. 3) Массовое внедрение блокчейна: Это тренд, но ты готов к непростым последствия

26 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC7 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Ethereum: Топ-3 причины держать в 2026? Ты когда-нибудь задумывался, насколько устойчивы эти факторы? 1) Развитие Web3: Да, это актуально, но ты готов к шокам, если проект окажется флудом? 2) Рост DeFi: Наши надежды на эту область велики, но помни, за каждым успехом скрываются риски! 3) Массовое внедрение блокчейна: Это звучит заманчиво, но где твой план, если всё пойдет не так? Ethereum по-прежнему держит свою по

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @SmartCurrencyTrends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мир Эфириума” (@SmartCurrencyTrends), 16,453 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmartCurrencyTrends.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.