Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Smart Waves Trading Podcast

Channel

Smart Waves Trading Podcast

@SmartWavesTradingPodcast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002528740873
TypeChannel
Username@SmartWavesTradingPodcast
Descriptionدر این کانال که "پادکست امواج هوشمند" نام دارد، به ارائه تجربیات، دانش و نظرات خود درباره "تحلیل و معامله‌گری در بازارهای مالی" می‌پردازم. ارتباط با من: @PrimeM3
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SmartWavesTradingPodcast

Growth

6925 Aug 2026, 09:46 — 69 subscribers25 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 69 subscribers25 Aug 2026, 09:4625 Aug 2026, 10:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 10:0069no change
25 Aug 2026, 09:4669first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 69 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.4
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 August 202522 August 2026)
Views total212
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
35
Videos
2
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 09s
Average length
7m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
847.1%
🔥423.5%
👍317.6%
❤‍🔥211.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC27 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

پادکست: معامله‌گر مدرن، مغز بدوی 🔹 قسمت دوم: آمیگدال (Amygdala)؛ دشمن شماره یک مدیریت ریسک ​"چرا با وجود اینکه می‌دونم نباید استاپ‌لاس رو دستکاری کنم، باز هم توی لحظه‌ی فشار روانی این کار رو انجام میدم؟" 🤔📈 در قسمت دوم، رفتیم سراغ عمیق‌ترین و سریع‌ترین بخش مغز ما که مسئول پردازش ترسه: آمیگدال. ​توی این قسمت یاد می‌گیریم که چرا مغز ما توی لحظات نوسان مارکت، «عقلانیت» رو از مدار خارج می‌کنه و اداره‌ی امور رو به «غرا

15 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

​🧠 پادکست: معامله‌گر مدرن، مغز بدوی ​رمزگشایی از رفتار انسان در بازارهای مالی از زاویه عصب‌شناسی و روانشناسی تکاملی ​درباره پادکست: ​چرا بیش از ۹۰ درصد معامله‌گران در بازارهای مالی (فارکس، کریپتو و بورس) شکست می‌خورند؟ آیا علت اصلی واقعاً عدم تسلط به تحلیل تکنیکال یا نداشتن استراتژی سودده است؟ ​علوم شناختی و عصب‌شناسی (Neuroscience) پاسخ متفاوتی به این سوال می‌دهند: مشکل از استراتژی شما نیست، مشکل از طراحی تکاملی مغز

1

15 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC56 viewsread 25 August 2026

https://castbox.fm/app/castbox/player/id7361016?v=8.22.11&autoplay=0

15 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC52 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

​🎙 پادکست: معامله‌گر مدرن، مغز بدوی 🔹 قسمت اول: چرا مغز انسان اصلاً برای معامله‌گری ساخته نشده؟ ​توی این اپیسود قرار نیست فرمول جادویی یاد بگیرید؛ قرارم نیست بگیم چرا فلان استراتژی جواب میده یا نمیده. رفتیم سراغ عمیق‌ترین لایه شکست تریدرها: «بیولوژی و عصب‌شناسی مغز انسان». ​📌 مباحث کلیدی این قسمت: ▫️ تاریخچه ۳۰۰ هزار ساله تکامل انسان خردمند و تأثیر آن روی تصمیمات مالی ما. ▫️ چرا مغز ما عاشق «قطعیت» است در حالی که باز

9 Feb 2026, 14:09 UTC232 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

سیستم معاملاتی و اهمیت آن

🔥32

14 Sept 2025, 16:29 UTC275 viewsread 25 August 2026

با اتمام خلاصه کتاب #Best_Loser_Wins فایل pdf کتاب رو به اشتراک میذارم براتون 👇🏻

14 Sept 2025, 16:12 UTC758 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

قسمت دوازدهم (آخر) از سری "خلاصه کتاب (Best Loser Wins )" که به شناخت و بررسی جنبه‌های روانشناسی معامله‌گری می‌پردازد. خواندن این کتاب برای تمام کسانی که به معامله‌گری به عنوان یک حرفه نگاه می‌کنند به شدت توصیه می‌شود. نکته اینکه این پادکست توسط هوش مصنوعی تولید شده و احتمال اشتباهات تلفظی در بعضی کلمات وجود داره. عنوان قسمت دوازدهم (آخر): ▪︎ذهنیت حرفه‌ای #Best_Loser_Wins

9 Sept 2025, 14:24 UTC218 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @SmartwavesInModernMarketsPhoto

تشکیل ساختار ABC زیگزاک با زیر موج میانی running flat و زیر موج ابتدایی Diagonal در چارت روزانه #اونس_طلا مثال از #فصل‌اول

👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SmartWavesTradingPodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

‏وقتی ما تریدر شدیم که تی‌پی کردن با استاپ خوردن چنتا معامله برامون از لحاظ حسی فرقی نداشته باشه! بلکه اجرای درست پلن اولین و آخرین اولویت باشه! اگه این تعریف درست باشه آیا شما تریدری؟

  1. بله، همینجوری‌ام29%
  2. خیر، اینجوری نیستم29%
  3. دوس دارم در آینده بشم35%
  4. حوصله داریا، چی بخریم سود کنیم؟7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Smart Waves Trading Podcast” (@SmartWavesTradingPodcast), 69 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmartWavesTradingPodcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.