Channel
@Smart_Money_Trend
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,415subscribers
-390 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001301466499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Smart_Money_Trend |
| Description | هرگز محتوای کانال به تنهایی ملاک خرید و فروش قرار نگیرد! این مطالب خلاصهای از مباحث گستردهای میباشد، جهت آشنایی بیشتر از ادمین پشتیبان کمک بگیرید👇 @SMT_Support |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Smart_Money_Trend |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11,300 average views per post against 12,612 subscribers — an engagement rate of 89.4%. Across the 7,801 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.63% and 16.9%, with a median of 8.53%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 124,020 |
| Mature posts only | 89.4% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 12,612 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:fas · 7,801 channels · p10 1.56% · p25 3.63% · p50 8.53% · p75 16.9% · p90 29.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.295th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.238% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:59 | 12,415 | -166 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 12,581 | -31 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 12,612 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:34 | 12,621 | +359 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:30 | 12,262 | -26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 12,288 | -72 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 12,360 | -39 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:11 | 12,399 | +333 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 12,066 | -156 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 12,222 | -156 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 12,378 | -33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 12,411 | -31 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 12,442 | -67 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 12,509 | +355 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:34 | 12,154 | -106 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 12,260 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 12,281 | -88 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 12,369 | -34 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 12,403 | -54 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 12,457 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (22 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 86,550 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 07:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅همزمان با پست پیوست در شهریور 1403، چارت نسبی میانگین قیمت مسکن تهران به سکه ترسیم شد که تا اینجای کار، هم خط نارنجی پودر شد، هم کف تاریخی خط قرمز و اینک این نسبت به زیر 1 سقوط کرده در تقابل با طلا، ملک بیش از 15 سال هست که مرده و این SMT بود که در آخرین پیک ملک، خلاف تصور اکثریتِ گذشته پسند و شیپور بلند "ملک مرگ نداره"، پیشاپیش میخ آخر را بر تابوت این مرداب سرمایه گذاری کوبید تا باورمندان به SMT رستگار باقی بمانن…
ولی من که بارها گفتم از جمله در این سری پست مهم صندوق های بازنشستگی👇 که به سرمایه گذاری رو دلار هم اعتقاد زیادی ندارم، چون دلار ارزش افزوده ی خاصی در بلند مدت نداره وفقط تورم کاور میکنه👇 2⃣بلکه معیار ما در بررسی نسبی ملک، بهتره که سکه به عنوان نماینده ی بازار طلا باید باشه در این چارت مشاهده می کنیم که انس، کاری کرد که طلا برخلاف دلار که نسبت به ملک تو چند سال اخیر ضعیف تر بوده👇 ✅نه تنها عقب نمانده، بلکه ملک در ک…
Sticker, posted without a caption
نمای نزدیک پست 23 مرداد کسی که مسیر سخت را انتخاب نکند بلاخره بازنده خواهد شد، این یک اصل بارها اثبات شده در بازار مالی بوده و هرگز سعی نکن تیزی چاقو را با رگ گردن امتحان کنی @Smart_Money_Trend
Sticker, posted without a caption
نمای نزدیک پست 23 مرداد چیزی که یک بار دیده شده شاید دیگر تکرار نشود، چیزی که دو بار تکرار شده ممکن است بار سوم هم رخ بدهد و آن چیز که هفت بار رخ داده به احتمال زیاد باز هم دیده میشود و آبان، از رگ گردن نزدیکتر است! @Smart_Money_Trend
سکه طرح جدید ❗️اینم آبان های 9 سال اخیر که اولین بار آذر 1402 بهش اشاره شد، جز 99 که قبلش طلا حبابی بود و با انتخاب نشدن ترامپ هیجان کاذب رخ داد و تا حدی آبان 1400، در تمامی 7 سال دیگه تا تونستن جلوی رشد دلار رو گرفتن و بعد آبان هولش دادن بره بالا با این قیمتی که بازار طلا دیروز داشته، احتمالا هفته بعد آخرین مقطعی باشه که طبق پلن vip، سکه بورس کالا زیر 188 باشه و خرید برای پول مازاد مجاز باشه
Sticker, posted without a caption
سیگنال خرید نیست، چون SMT بار خودش رو در این سهم، 300 درصد پایینتر رو اون خط مشکی بسته، این پست صرفا یک تلنگر جهت درک مطلبی راهبردی هست که در آینده، اکثریتی با درد لمس خواهند کرد👇 فارغ از اصلاحات موقت بین راهی، بازی بورس خیلی مونده به انتها برسه، همانطور که کف این سیکل سختتر از سیکل های قبلی بود، پیک این سیکل هم سختتر سوپرحباب های قبلی خواهد بود که باید از الان، برای خروج به موقع در آن روز موعود یادگرفت و آماده ب…
رمپنا نمیدونم یه چیزی رو طی این چند سال در بورس و اخیرا در دلار دقت کردید یا نه؟!👇 کف 91 حدود 160 روز طول کشید و سقفش 40 روز، کف 97 حدود 230 روز و سقفش 170، در تمام طول خط آبی، میشد گفت دیگه اصلاح تموم شده، ولی 600 روز فرسایشی طول کشید، حالا ببین رشد آتی بازار که حداقل، سوبل سکه هست و به ابعاد اون علامت سوال، بالاتر هم خواهد رفت، چقدر در سقف طول میکشه! هی فکر میکنی دیگه رشد تموم شده ولی بالاتر میره، واسه چند درصد …
Sticker, posted without a caption
همچون موارد فراوانی در گذشته، حقیقتِ آنچه در پیش است را به آنان نشان دادیم👇 👌آنکه SMT را باور داشت و به حقیقت پی برد، رستگار خواهد ماند ✅انکه SMT را باور داشت ولی سرگردان بود و به دنبال حقیقت آمد، رستگار خواهد شد ❗️آنکه SMT را باور داشت ولی به دنبال حقیقت نیامد، شاید رستگار شود ⚠️و انکه هنوز به SMT باور ندارد، رستگار نخواهد شد 💎باشد که رستگار شوید 4 مهر 1405 @Smart_Money_Trend
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Smart_Money_Trend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 7 posts on @Smart_Money_Trend as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روند پول هوشمند” (@Smart_Money_Trend), 12,415 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Smart_Money_Trend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.