Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Метод Смолякова

Channel

Метод Смолякова

@SmolyakovAtlant

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,349subscribers

-203 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001152554673
TypeChannel
Username@SmolyakovAtlant
CreatedBetween 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SmolyakovAtlant

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,34915,55215,450.57 August 2026 — 15,552 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,552 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,545 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,540 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,535 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,530 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,526 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,519 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,513 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,511 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,508 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,500 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,495 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,487 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,481 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,479 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,476 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,473 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,470 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,468 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,465 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,466 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,461 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,459 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,456 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,445 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,425 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,402 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,391 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,379 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,366 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,349 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,319–15,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:3615,349-17
15 Sept 2026, 17:3915,366-13
14 Sept 2026, 01:3915,379-12
12 Sept 2026, 05:3615,391-11
10 Sept 2026, 01:2115,402-23
6 Sept 2026, 19:5715,425-20
4 Sept 2026, 09:5715,445-11
3 Sept 2026, 00:4715,456-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:2815,459-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:1815,461-5
30 Aug 2026, 02:5415,466+1
29 Aug 2026, 04:1315,465-3
28 Aug 2026, 05:3415,468-2
27 Aug 2026, 08:5515,470-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:0715,473-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:4315,476-3
23 Aug 2026, 22:0915,479-2
22 Aug 2026, 08:5715,481-6
20 Aug 2026, 21:5315,487-8
19 Aug 2026, 23:0615,495first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.12%
avg views ÷ 15,349 subscribers
Avg views / post
632
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held78 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total18,338
Reactions total254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 29s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

695 reactions across 77 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22932.9%
19828.5%
🔥10014.4%
💯699.93%
😐699.93%
🤝101.44%
😍60.863%
👌40.576%
🥰30.432%
👏20.288%
🙏20.288%
🤔20.288%
10.144%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC271 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✨ История участницы ⚖️ Мои результаты: минус 4,4 кг за 10 дней голода. Но вес мне особо не важен — на марафон шла ради здоровья. Чувствую себя прекрасно. 🙏 Личный опыт участницы #научноеголодание #здоровьеизнутри #оздоровление

👍41💯1😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

2 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC320 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Что такое аутофагия? Объясняю, что происходит при голодании и сколько голодать для аутофагии. 🔍 что происходит на 3 день голодания — аутофагия Сохраните, чтобы не потерять. #аутофагия #голоданиеНаВоде

👍92😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

1 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC402 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💬 Живой отзыв ⚖️ Благодарю за сопровождение и ценную информацию о голодании, за мотивацию. Моя цель, с которой шла на голодание, достигнута — вес минус 10 кг. ✍️ Личный опыт участницы марафона #научноеголодание #похудение #оздоровление

👍4🔥31😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

1 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC417 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Можно ли голодать при низком гемоглобине? 🔍 можно ли голодать при низком гемоглобине? Пишите в комментариях.

👍61😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

31 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC486 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📌 Отзыв участницы марафона ✨ 11-й день, общий отвес 7 кг. Цвет лица улучшился, кожа чистая, во всём теле лёгкость. Процедуры все по плану. 🙏 Личный опыт участницы марафона #научноеголодание #здоровьекожи #детоксорганизма

👍32💯1

Signed smolyakov_bot

31 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC354 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Почему нельзя просто «снизить инсулин»? 🔬 Многие думают, что при инсулинорезистентности нужно бороться с инсулином. Это не так. Давайте разберём как это работает на самом деле 👇 Как должно быть в норме: Вы поели → организм превратил еду в глюкозу → глюкоза подошла к клетке → инсулин открыл «дверку» → глюкоза вошла внутрь → клетка получила энергию ✅ Что происходит при инсулинорезистентности: Каждая клетка окружена

5🔥3🤔2

31 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC429 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Как ЧАСТО можно голодать, чтобы не навредить организму? 🔍 как ЧАСТО можно голодать, чтобы не навредить организму? Ставьте 🔥, если было полезно. #периодическоеголодание #какчастоголодать

🔥53😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

30 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC535 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🌿 Метод Смолякова ⚖️ День выхода, вес 64. Отвес за марафон 5,7 кг. Второй марафон прошёл просто в удовольствие. ✍️ Личный опыт участницы марафона #научноеголодание #похудение #оздоровление

💯2🔥21😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

30 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC514 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

КАРНИВОР — кето-диета на максималках! Стоит ли пробовать? 🔍 кАРНИВОР — кето-диета на максималках! Стоит ли пробовать? Ставьте ❤️, если разбор в тему. #карнивор #кетодиета

3👏2👍1😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

29 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC578 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Витамины пришли, для заказа писать админу 👉 @kupdam Стоимость коробки на 30 дней 10 тыс руб + доставка.

🔥42🤝2😐1

29 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC550 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

❓ Напишите в комментариях: знали ли вы, что при проблемах с сердцем и поджелудочной полезно использовать практику голодания? 🔍 какие БОЛЕЗНИ лечит голодание? Мнение врачей и натуропатов Делитесь с теми, кому пригодится. #лечебноеголодание #разгрузочныйдень

6👍1🔥1😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

28 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC563 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✨ История участницы ⚡ 4-й марафон, 3-й день. Общий отвес 2,4 кг. Состояние отличное, энергии много, пью много тёплой воды. 🙏 Личный опыт участницы марафона #научноеголодание #энергия #интервальноеголодание

👍2💯1😐1

Signed smolyakov_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @SmolyakovAtlant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Шагарова
@drshagarova · 106,452
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Метод Смолякова” (@SmolyakovAtlant), 15,349 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmolyakovAtlant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.