Channel
@Snezatarget
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
566subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002399346211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Snezatarget |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Snezatarget |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 566 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:12 | 574 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 579 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 576 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 552 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 552 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
340 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 162 | 47.6% | |
| 🔥 | 99 | 29.1% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 7.35% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 3.24% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ТАРГЕТ, КОТОРЫЙ ПРИНОСИТ ЗАЯВКИ, А НЕ ПРОСТО ТРАТИТ БЮДЖЕТ 🔥 Сколько раз за много лет работы я слышу одну и ту же фразу: Я уже запускала рекламу. Деньги ушли, а заявок почти не было. И чаще всего проблема совсем не в таргете: - Не в кабинете. - Не в алгоритмах. - И даже не в стоимости рекламы. Проблема в другом… Меня зовут Снежана, и я помогаю экспертам, предпринимателям и специалистам выстраивать рекламу так, чт…
❤19🔥12👍6👏6
Уххххх получила максимум удовольствия от фотосессии!!!! 💖
🔥10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Девчонки, помните, совсем недавно я рассказывала вам про один кейс? 😜 И меня в очередной раз заставило задуматься, что секрет успеха продаж на такие суммы, заключается не в какой-то волшебной схеме, дорогой рекламе или идеальном контенте. Однажды мой клиент, с которой мы работаем уже давно, сказала мне очень простую, но важную фразу. Главное — это уметь продавать. Как бы банально это ни звучало, именно этот навык…
🔥21❤14🥰11👏3👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8🔥1
Немного личного 💖
❤7
КЕЙС СВЫШЕ 1 🍋 ОТ КОТОРОГО Я САМА ЕЩЁ НЕ МОГУ ОТОЙТИ 😳🔥 Обязательно послушайте голосовое Каждый раз, когда получаю такие сообщения от девочек и вижу эти цифры в кабинете, внутри сначала включается какое-то тотальное неверие в происходящее🙈 Сижу и думаю: Это правда сейчас происходит со мной? И это реально сделала я?😀 Потому что когда ты долго работаешь, тестируешь, выстраиваешь систему, докручиваешь воронки, связк…
❤25🔥16👏13
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7
🔥 Свято место пусто не бывает… Только что освободилось одно место на практикум. К сожалению, одна из участниц не смогла продолжить участие, поэтому ОДНО место свободно. Честно, я даже не планировала открывать набор повторно. Но раз так сложилось, значит, кому-то сегодня действительно повезло. Не люблю фразу «кто успел — тот и съел», но сейчас именно так🤭 Если вы смотрели, думали, откладывали или ждали знак — воз…
🔥21❤19👍16
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Snezatarget. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продажи: от рекламы до оплаты” (@Snezatarget), 566 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Snezatarget.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.