Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SnowBall

Channel

SnowBall

@SnowBallsm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,771subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255810059
TypeChannel
Username@SnowBallsm
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SnowBallsm

Growth

23,77123,94823,859.57 August 2026 — 23,948 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,947 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,943 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,940 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,932 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,920 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,910 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,896 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,902 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,898 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,889 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,881 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,877 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,861 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,850 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,842 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,828 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,817 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,816 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,810 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,803 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,794 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,786 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,778 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,771 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 29 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,744–23,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 16:2223,771-7
3 Sept 2026, 13:1823,778-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:4223,786-8
1 Sept 2026, 06:2623,794-9
31 Aug 2026, 06:2623,803-7
30 Aug 2026, 07:1223,810-6
29 Aug 2026, 07:1223,816-1
28 Aug 2026, 07:0823,817-11
27 Aug 2026, 05:1123,828-6
26 Aug 2026, 05:4223,834-8
25 Aug 2026, 05:1223,842-8
24 Aug 2026, 00:4623,850-11
22 Aug 2026, 10:1623,861-16
20 Aug 2026, 22:1423,877-4
19 Aug 2026, 22:2723,881-8
18 Aug 2026, 21:3523,889-9
17 Aug 2026, 20:3523,898-4
16 Aug 2026, 17:3523,902+6
15 Aug 2026, 04:3323,896-14
13 Aug 2026, 22:4823,910first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 23,771 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,320
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held27 (18 May 202614 August 2026)
Views total83,220
Reactions total951
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,156 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,15568.3%
🔥58618.6%
🤔1193.77%
🥰772.44%
👏712.25%
🙏682.15%
471.49%
🤩150.475%
🎉100.317%
😍80.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC≈8,130 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Nifty Auto too

🔥55👍12🙏5👏4

14 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC≈8,190 views120 reactionsread 3 September 2026

So the quality stocks are consistently moving up. Only the headline indices are struggling which usually happen during the start of bull market

🔥86👏15👍13🤩41🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC≈8,030 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Even Nifty Midcap is making new ATH everyday.

24🔥13👍11🙏4

14 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈7,370 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Defence started gaiing momemntum after a consolidation at ATH

👍29🔥17🙏3👏21

14 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈7,060 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Manufacturing Index is making new ATH

🔥30👍9👏3🥰2🙏2

14 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈6,850 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Nifty 50 equal weight index is at ATH

🔥33👍9🙏3👏2

14 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈6,650 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Pharma Index continue to move to new highs

🔥31👍10🙏32👏2

7 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈10,600 views229 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Overall beneath the surface, a bull market started few months back. Pharma, Auto, Manufacturing, Healthcare, defence, etc have already broken out. Regarding broader indices, Nifty 50 equal weight index, Nifty 500 equal weight index, Midcap, Small cap indices have broken out. Reliance, HDFC Bank, ITC, Infy, TCS etc are resulting in Nifty/Sensex/BN underperformance. So To me, it looks like the bull market already start

👍170🔥41👏94🎉3🤩2

7 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈9,940 views95 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Market is struggling to sustain above 24600. but still I've not considered the breakout as a failure.

👍83🔥83🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈10,400 views186 reactionsread 3 September 2026

After so much of struggle, finally Nifty sustained above 24600 yesterday whole day. Though there was a gap down this morning, immediately it recovered. I'm considering this as a breakout provided Nifty doesn't fall below 24600 and sustain there.

👍141🔥35🤔4👏3🤩3

4 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈11,600 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/Shijumonantony/status/2084584915321184441?s=20

👍61🔥7👏2🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈12,800 views82 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/Shijumonantony/status/2084221938067714128?s=20

👍56🔥13👏9🤔31

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @SnowBallsm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aakanksha Option Trading
@aakankshatrading · 55,365
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
fundfolio by Sharique Samsudheen
@fundfolio · 125,418
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
shafiiq_smk
@shafiiq_smk · 73,575
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
ഓഹരി പഠനം
@oharipadanambynikhil · 43,353
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
Theta Gainers
@thetagainers · 113,390
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Upstox
@TheOfficialUpstox · 173,135
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Voodoo Tradings Offcial
@voodootrainings · 55,370
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
The Madras Trader (Official)
@themadrastrader1 · 64,784
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Power Of Stocks
@PowerOfStocks · 275,627
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Zerodha
@zerodhain · 54,112
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Commodity Focus By Kotak Neo
@CommodityFocusByKotakNeo · 64,174
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SnowBall” (@SnowBallsm), 23,771 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SnowBallsm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.